TESTIMONY OF
SSG MARK O. BRIGHT
NEW HAMPSHIRE ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
BEFORE THE
COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS
SUBCOMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
September 19, 2005
Mr. Chairman and Members of the
Subcommittee: My name is SSG Mark Bright and I am a member of the NH
Hampshire Army National Guard. Thank you for the time and opportunity to
speak about my unit redeployment process. When information started to
come down the chain of command about our return date, we were all very
happy, to say the least. We started many briefings before leaving Iraq,
such as medical screening, combat stress briefings, general benefits,
etc. Shortly after completion of the briefings in theater, we were
informed we would be going through 4-7 days of the same type briefings
at Ft Dix. As a Squad Leader, I watched my soldiers grow upset and angry
over the prospect of waiting longer to see their families. I was afraid
we would be there doing repetitive and redundant training. I am glad to
say I was wrong!
I have been deployed three times in my career. My first deployment was
during Desert Shield/Desert Storm. While we trained for our mission very
hard and aggressively, there was very little emphasis at that time on
our families or the hardships that might face us upon our return. I
spent nine months in country on that tour. After flying home, we had a
ceremony and were released immediately to resume our lives and pick up
where we left off. I saw that for way too many of my peers, picking up
where they left off was almost impossible. Family situations had changed
while they were gone. There were new babies and broken homes. There were
soldiers who were angry and didn’t know why. They would jump at a loud
noise. They would feel sick and not report it.
My second deployment to the Sinai desert as an observer, not on a combat
tour, lasted six months. Upon our return, the reception was not much
different—there was a ceremony, then we were released to our families.
This time, over the next few duty days there were some briefings. Some
of them were the mandatory briefings soldiers receive every year, such
as SAEDA, safety etc.
After arriving at Ft Dix from Iraq, I could see immediately this was
going to be different and that we would be getting a lot more
information. The days were not extremely long and there was time for the
soldiers to decompress. The spouses were well informed and were going
through briefings of their own in New Hampshire. We attended briefings
that really applied to our lives and our families. Reintegration
briefings focused on teaching soldiers, who had been in an extremely
fast-paced, dangerous and uncertain environment, that life at home would
be different. They briefed us that we would more than likely not be able
to pick up right where we left off. There were some issues at Ft Dix, in
my opinion, that could have gone better, but overall, it was a well put
together operation. The NHNG was there by our side the whole time. They
supported us administratively and did whatever it took to help.
Upon our return to New Hampshire, the state put together its own
program. I have found in my military career that it’s the small things
that fall through the cracks that cause the most damage. This process
eliminated almost all of this. They brought in representatives from the
VA informing us of all the benefits available to us. Counseling was made
available for all soldiers and their families. There was good medical
care and follow-ups were offered. State employment agencies were brought
in to help soldiers find employment if needed. They even helped soldiers
find places to live. Compared to the other deployments I have been on,
this return has, by far, been the best. Genuine care has been showed to
the soldiers, their families and their employers. Thank you very much
for your time, and please feel free to ask any questions you may have.
|