STATEMENT FOR
THE RECORD BY
JAMES BOMBARD
DIRECTOR, PUBLIC RELATIONS
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE APPROVING AGENCIES
MAY 25, 2005
Introduction
Chairman Boozman, Ranking Member Herseth and members of the Subcommittee
on Economic Opportunity, I am pleased to appear before you today on
behalf of the National Association of State Approving Agencies to
provide comments H.R. 717, H.R. 745 and H.R. 1207. I should mention at
the outset that I also am the Vice Chair of the Legislative Committee of
the Association and have had the pleasure of working with the members
and the staff of the Committee for many years as the Committee has
worked to improve the various “GI Bills”.
Remarks
The Association is pleased to support the provisions that are presented
in the three bills. In general, much has been done in recent years to
provide service members, veterans and other eligible persons with
greater opportunities to use the education and training benefits to
which they are entitled. Yet, the nature of the today’s global economy
demands that we continue to strive to help our workforce - especially
our veterans – to gain new knowledge and learn new skills in order to
maximize their contributions to the Nation. The provisions of H.R. 717,
H.R. 745 and H.R. 1207 provide either directly or indirectly for these
kinds of new learning opportunities.
H.R. 717 expands the accelerated payments provision of law to allow
veterans to obtain the kind of financial support necessary for
enrollment in commercial driver license training programs. Nationally,
truck driving programs are relatively expensive because of the
complexities of the today’s equipment and the demands of new licensing
requirements for specialized loads. Program cost can reach as high as
$6,000 or $7,000 for 12 weeks of instruction. An opportunity to use the
accelerated payment provision of law would allow more veterans to pursue
their chosen occupation.
The Association supports H.R. 717 section 2. Exclusion of benefit
payments under the Montgomery GI Bill from income for eligibility
determinations for federal education loans.
GI Bill benefits are intended to be an entitlement to which all who
serve in the Armed Forces of our Nation are eligible. Moreover, it has
always been the intent of Congress that the GI Bill be the premier
program in our Nation to help our citizens to further their education
and training. Inclusion of GI Bill benefits in any formula for
determining eligibility for other federal educational assistance is not
consistent with these goals nor the sacrifices made by those who protect
the freedoms that we all so thoroughly enjoy.
H.R. 745 provides for the creation of a pilot program for veterans to
use their VA educational assistance benefits for training associated
with the ownership of a franchise. We support this proposal based on the
fact that it would expand the number of opportunities for veterans to
obtain gainful employment in a field of their choosing. The risks
associated with this pilot would be few since the “rules” pertaining to
the approval of the programs are almost identical to those currently
required for other non-accredited, non-degree programs of education and
training. Additionally, most state laws would (as they do now) require a
review of the organization offering the training for state licensing
purposes, thus, there is little to no risk of “fly by night” training.
H.R. 1207 provides a much needed expansion of the kinds of services in
which VA work-study students may be engaged. The first part of the bill
allows VA students to assist veterans and their spouses as they work to
achieve their education, training and employment goals. In our view,
this is an excellent use of VA work-study funds. The second part of the
bill is a pilot program that expands the kinds of work in which VA
students can be involved while they are enrolled at an educational
institution. We believe that this expansion is appropriate as the cost
of higher education escalates at a much faster pace than VA educational
assistance benefits because of budgetary constraints. The pilot program
also has sufficient limitations to ensure that it will not be abused by
an overly ambitious postsecondary educational institution with an eye on
cutting its overhead costs and increasing its profit margin.
Closing
In closing, Mr. Chairman, I would like to thank you again for the
opportunity to comment on the three bills. Thank you also for your
efforts to make improvements to the education and training assistance
programs that have been made available to those who defend the freedoms
that we all so thoroughly enjoy. As stated earlier, we support the
provisions of the bills and at this time, I would be happy to respond to
any questions that you might have.
|