Statement of Sandeep Wadhwa, MD,
MBA Chairman, Government Affairs Committee, Disease Management
Association of America Vice President, Care Management Services,
McKesson Health Solutions, McKesson Corporation
Wednesday, May 18, 2005
Chairman, Government
Affairs Committee,
Disease Management Association of America
Vice President, McKesson Health Solutions I am pleased to submit this
statement on behalf of the Disease Management Association of American (DMAA)
and McKesson to the House Veterans' Affairs Health Subcommittee. My name
is Dr. Sandeep Wadhwa, and I am the Chairman of the Government Affairs
Committee of the DMAA. I also oversee disease management programs for
McKesson Corporation, the 15th largest company in the US and the
nation’s largest healthcare services company. McKesson is one of largest
providers of disease management (DM) services to government health
payers including Medicaid, Medicare, FEHBP, TriCare and the VA. Our
company was awarded a pilot heart failure disease management program in
VISN 17. I am also a practicing internist and geriatrician, and am
intimately familiar with the long term and chronic care needs of
veterans from my five years of practice at the Philadelphia VA Medical
Center.
The Disease Management Association of America is a non-profit, voluntary
membership organization, representing all aspects of the disease
management community.
DMAA has established an industry-standard definition for qualified DM
programs and entities. This definition, established in consultation with
primary care and specialty physicians and representing private practice,
health plan, and institutional perspectives, is as follows:
Disease management is a system of coordinated healthcare interventions
and communications for populations with conditions where patient
self-care efforts are a significant factor in supporting the
physician/patient relationship and their plan of care;
Disease management emphasizes prevention of exacerbations and
complications by utilizing evidence-based practice guidelines and
patient empowerment strategies; and
Disease management evaluates clinical, humanistic and economic outcomes
on an ongoing basis with the goal of improving overall health.
• Disease management services provided to an individual must include:
Population identification processes;
Evidence-based practice guidelines
Collaborative practice models to include physician and support-service
providers;
Patient self-management education (e.g. primary prevention, behavior
modification programs, and compliance/surveillance);
Process and outcomes measurement, evaluation and management, and routine
reporting; and
A feedback loop (e.g. communication with patient, physician, health
plan, and ancillary providers and practice profiling)
Disease management programs have become widely utilized by almost all
commercial payers and nearly fifty percent of state Medicaid programs.
Through the use of DM programs, public and private payers are seeing
improvements in health status and quality of care, as well as,
reductions in costs for their vulnerable populations with chronic
diseases. Indeed, Medicare is about to launch a landmark set of chronic
care improvement projects (e.g. MMA Sec. 721) in the fee-for-service (FFS)
population this summer to provide heart failure and diabetes programs
for our nation’s elderly.
Support for VA disease management and telehealth initiatives
DMAA strongly encourages and supports the Veterans Administration’s (VA)
adoption of telehealth initiatives. The VA has done extensive
evaluations of telemonitoring devices which have demonstrated their
efficacy in improving patient health status and reducing avoidable
utilization of VA acute care resources. 1 The VA’s use of telenursing is
in an earlier stage. Telenursing leverages the telephone as a
no-additional cost and nearly universal device to establish a
therapeutic relationship between nurses and patients for education,
counseling, and monitoring. Our members have demonstrated the value of
using the telephone across a variety of settings to improve the health
of vulnerable populations cost-effectively. To that end, we strongly
1 VISN 8 Community Care Coordination Service – Service Overview.
http://www1.va.gov/visn8/v8/clinical/cccs/service/overview.asp
encourage the VA to leverage the ubiquity and utility of the telephone
in its telehealth initiatives. Indeed, the VA is beginning to measure
the value of telenursing programs with its population. A pilot cohort
study in VISN 17 will begin in the fall of 2005 to compare heart failure
patients in the South Texas Veterans Health Care System who receive a DM
intervention to those in the Central System who are not receiving the
intervention.
Rural health
A recent study showed that the health of veterans who live in rural
areas is worse than those who live elsewhere, even after adjusting for
socioeconomic factors.2 Telehealth improves access to care for rural
veterans with chronic conditions. It is also a valuable service for
impoverished veterans who live in urban areas and are unable to travel
easily to clinics. Telehealth overcomes many of these geographic
barriers to care by employing telenursing, telemonitoring, and clinical
decision support tools to educate and monitor veterans where they
reside. As a result of increased experience in providing these services,
increased scale and technological advances, the cost of providing
telehealth services has lessened considerably. Expensive home visits by
nurses can be reserved for those who are unstable.
2 Weeks WB, Kazis LE et al. Differences in health-related quality of
life in rural and urban veterans. American Journal of Public Health.
94(10), October, 2004: 1762-1767.
Long term care
Telehealth initiatives, including disease management programs, have also
been shown to decrease over-utilization, particularly nursing home
admissions and stays.3 As an “aging in place” solution, telenursing,
both separately and as a vital part of disease management programs have
shown tremendous value in Medicare managed care settings. Caregivers of
seniors, in particular, benefit not only from better understanding
symptoms and the treatment plan, but also from the emotional and social
support and reinforcement that telenurses provide. We recommend further
research and pilots in the VHA setting.
Mental Health
In 2003, seventeen percent of veterans sought specialized mental health
services from a VA facility. Estimates of substance abuse range from 22
to 29 percent of veterans. Rates of depression, anxiety, and psychotic
disorders are much higher than the general population.4 Telehealth
services can play a critical role in two domains pertaining to mental
health. For patients with common chronic diseases such as heart failure
or diabetes, mental health disorders, particularly depression, occur at
alarming rates – ranging from 24 to 42 percent in a recent review
article.5 In our experience, telenurses
3 Berg GB, Wadhwa, S and A Johnson. A matched-cohort study of health
services utilization and financial outcomes for a heart failure
disease-management program in elderly patients. Journal of the American
Geriatrics Society. 52(10) October, 2004: 1655-1661. 4 US Medicine
Institute for Health Studies. The Changing Face of Mental Health
Services in the Veterans Health Administration. October, 2004. http://www.usminstitute.org/MHExecSummaryOct04.pdf
5 Guck TP, Elasasser GN et al. Depression and congestive heart failure.
Congestive Heart Failure. 9(3). May-June, 2003:163-169.
provide relief from social isolation and anxiety, thus decreasing the
need for mental health services. Telehealth solutions can also promote
medication adherence; preliminary results of medication reminder systems
with telemonitoring capabilities have demonstrated success in improving
adherence to therapy in patients with schizophrenia.
Summary
In conclusion, disease management, care coordination and telehealth
solutions already play an important role in the treatment of veterans,
and, with appropriate fostering, they can play an even greater role. We
strongly encourage the VA to promote and evaluate telenursing as well as
telemonitoring interventions. DMAA commends the leadership shown by this
Subcommittee and the Administration to promote the value of all of these
initiatives and welcomes the opportunity to share our members’
experiences.
Again, Mr. Chairman and Ranking Member of the Subcommittee, thank you
for the opportunity to present testimony today. We look forward to
working with you and your staff to realize our shared vision of better
care for our nation’s veterans. At this time, I would be happy to answer
any questions from you or the other Members of the Subcommittee.
|