Statement of
Linda Godleski, MD
Associate Chief of Staff for Education
West Haven VA Medical Center, Connecticut
Department of Veterans Affairs
May 18, 2005Mr.
Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee:
It is an honor for me to be here before this Subcommittee today and
provide you with testimony on VA’s use and development of telemedicine.
I am a psychiatrist who has practiced in a number of healthcare
settings, and currently, I also serve as the Associate Chief of Staff
for Education (ACOS) at the VA Connecticut Health Care System in West
Haven, Connecticut, and as the VA’s National Lead for Telemental Health.
I am involved in telemedicine in each of these three roles and will
provide the Committee with perspectives from each role because I believe
they all help highlight how VA is using and developing telemedicine. My
testimony will focus particularly on what I see as the “people” issues
involved in using and developing telemedicine.
Like the majority of my colleagues in psychiatry I was trained to care
for patients through face-to-face interactions. It was only when I came
to the VA that I first learned about telemental health as a very
different way of practicing my profession. Furthermore, after reviewing
the relevant healthcare literature, I appreciated how telemental health
had a place in the delivery of care and could replicate a face-to-face
interaction. Most importantly, I was reassured that patients were
satisfied with receiving care in this way while providing them improved
access and saving them the cost, inconvenience and time involved in
travel.
My initial exposure to telemental health was in Veterans Integrated
Service Network (VISN) 9 when I was the Mental Health Services Manager
there. The Huntington VA medical center (VAMC) had been using tele-mental
health successfully to provide care to patients in distant Vet Centers
and community-based outpatient clinics (CBOC’s). I became involved
directly in the establishment and running of tele-mental services to
connect all VISN facilities for expert tele-mental health consultation
and on-going treatment. I could see first hand how our veteran patients
were very comfortable with it and how much easier it made it for them to
receive care. Of course, there are, and always will be times, when a
patient will need to be seen face-to-face in a clinic, but in numerous
instances tele-mental health can provide general psychiatry and also
specialty psychiatry services such as for substance abuse care and care
for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
As VA’s lead for tele-mental health, I am what is generally referred to
as a “clinical champion”. A clinical champion is a practitioner who
helps introduce and develop new practices in healthcare and acts as an
advocate for these new practices with their colleagues. It is a
privilege to help VA and my colleagues lead the way with a new
healthcare development like tele-mental health. I am one of many
clinical leads for telemedicine in VA. There are also leads for tele-rehabilitation,
tele-surgery, tele-endocrinology, tele-dermatology and for tele-retinal
imaging. We all receive support from the national Care Coordination
Program Office, and I think it is important to share with you what I
feel is a commonality between us all that makes us effective in what we
do. I believe it is the fact that VA’s leads for telemedicine are
committed to serve veteran patients, and that our colleagues know we are
using telemedicine in ways that truly work for patients and ensure
excellence of care.
The clinical leads for telemedicine have established a network of
telemedicine clinicians and VISN leaders. In VA all of the clinical
leads for telemedicine have developed “toolkits” for our respective
areas of telemedicine. These toolkits help new programs get started and
allow new programs to learn from the experience of other VA established
programs, rather than having to re-invent the wheel. These toolkits are
also very useful for staff training. The tele-mental toolkit formalizes
the requirements to develop a tele-mental health service and educate all
staff involved. This is where my role as ACOS for Education has a
bearing on the development of telemedicine.
One of the challenges in sustaining telemedicine is to make sure that
there are practitioners with the requisite skills and competencies who
are committed to the program. If the tele-mental health service depends
upon an individual mental health practitioner who is enthusiastic about
telemedicine then what happens if this practitioner leaves? There is the
risk that the service will cease, and the service will no longer be
available to our patients, unless there is another practitioner
available to maintain it.
The situation I have just described at the micro-level of the individual
clinic also needs to be considered at the macro-level of educating
health practitioners of the future. In my own specialty, medical schools
and residency programs are just beginning to train the next generation
of psychiatrists in the use of tele-mental health. In VA, we are
starting to explore what a tele-mental health component to a residency
program might look like. I believe that the ability to recruit newly
trained psychiatrists who are familiar with tele-mental health would be
of great benefit to VA in sustaining tele-mental health programs.
Incorporating tele-mental health into residency programs in the future
may have a catalytic effect in terms of promoting the initiation of tele-mental
health in the wider healthcare system. My reason for making this
assertion is as follows. Over recent years, I have regularly seen
medical students and residents who have come to train in VA and in doing
so have gained experience with VA’s electronic patient record. If
students and residents then return to a medical center that does not
have an electronic record, they appreciate the importance of the
electronic record as compared to the paper chart in the delivery of care
to the patient, and the students and residents become great advocates
for computerized patient records. I predict that there would be this
same effect with tele-mental health.
Currently, I practice in VISN 1, the VA New England Healthcare System.
The VISN has recently established a tele-mental service between Togus
and Caribou, Maine. The development of this service was presented at
VA’s Care Coordination Telehealth Leadership Meeting in Salt Lake City
in April 2005. The service was established because of the 249-mile
distance that veteran patients previously had to travel between Caribou
and Togus for mental health care. The normal seasonal snowfall is nine
and a half feet. Even if it doesn’t snow, it is a 10 hour round trip and
there is also the cost of gasoline for the veteran patient. Our tele-mental
health toolkit was used to systematically work through the clinical,
technical, and business processes necessary to establish this tele-mental
health clinic, and it is now up and running. The outcomes after initial
evaluation have been one hundred percent patient satisfaction and a no
show rate that is lower with telemedicine than it was at the
face-to-face clinic.
The success of this clinic means that VISN 1 is preparing to extend the
service to other CBOCs in Maine. Other considerations are:
• expanding this to services beyond psychiatry,
• using the link for conferencing and consultation,
• facillitating remote case conferencing,
• conducting family interviews/intervention, and
• providing in-service training.
Installing the necessary telecommunications connection between Togus and
Caribou and setting up the equipment at either end made tele-mental
health feasible. I hope that in my testimony I have been able to give
you a sense of how recognizing and attending to the people processes at
both a patient and practitioner level are vital to developing and
sustaining telemedicine services. As someone who had no experience with
tele-mental health until I began working at VA, I am privileged to help
champion telemedicine I would like to conclude with a quote from one of
VISN 1’s satisfied veteran patients from Caribou who no longer has to
drive to Togus for care. He said of the service, “Thank God there’s
telemedicine.”
Mr. Chairman, this concludes my statement. I will now be happy any
questions the Subcommittee might have.
|