Statement of
Adam Darkins, MD, MPHM
Chief Consultant for Care Coordination
Veterans Health Administration
Department of Veterans Affairs
May 18, 2005Mr.
Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee:
It is an honor for me to be here before the Subcommittee today and to
address the Subcommittee members’ interest in VA’s use and development
of telemedicine. I would like to personally thank the Subcommittee for
focusing attention on this important area.
By definition, telemedicine involves the use of information and
telecommunications technologies to deliver care when patient and
practitioner are separated by distance and/or time. Analyses of
healthcare delivery, such as those by the Institute of Medicine, now
cite VA as an exemplar that other healthcare organizations should
emulate when using health information technology to improve the quality
of care and resolve endemic concerns about patient safety. VA’s
application of this technology enables more care to be provided to
veteran patients with proportionally fewer resources and in doing so
helps VA set benchmarks for levels of patient satisfaction and achieve
outstanding scores on 18 quality indicators for disease prevention and
treatment. VA’s telemedicine initiatives build upon this self-same
health information technology platform to help provide the right care in
the right place at the right time to the veteran patients whom it is
VA’s privilege to serve.
The rationale for VA’s ongoing development of a robust and sustainable
technology infrastructure for telemedicine is focused on using this
resource to help meet high-priority areas of health care need in the
veteran population. Dedicated health care practitioners in VA often find
themselves challenged when providing care because the health care needs
of a diverse and geographically distributed veteran population are
changing. Increasingly, this population presents practitioners with
chronic conditions that need ongoing monitoring and management.
In common with other healthcare organizations, VA has a finite set of
physical locations from which it can provide traditional face-to-face
encounters to treat veteran patients. This restriction necessitates
practitioners having to make trade-offs between access, quality, and
cost, especially if patients live in rural areas and if they have
problems with mobility.
These challenges are further compounded by difficulties with the
recruitment and retention of practitioners in rural areas. Solving what
could otherwise become an insoluble equation, in relation to providing
timely and appropriate care cost-effectively, is stimulating
telemedicine implementation at the local VA Medical Center level and is
the reason for the programmatic imperatives VA is placing on supporting
telemedicine at the national and Veteran Integrated Service Network (VISN)
level. VA has experience of piloting the delivery of care using
telemedicine in 32 clinical areas. However, in my testimony today, I
would like to highlight five major areas of national telemedicine
development that show how telemedicine addresses pressing patient care
needs.
Home Tele-health
The first area of need that drives telemedicine in VA that I would like
to highlight is home-telehealth. As they age, veteran patients mirror
the general Medicare population in that they are living longer,
remaining healthier, and choosing, when possible, to continue living in
their own homes. The homes and local communities that veterans fought to
protect in times of war remain equally dear to them as they age and
confront new adversaries in the form of chronic disease such as diabetes
and chronic heart failure. In July 2003, VA instituted a national
program to enhance and extend care and case management using home-telehealth,
thereby providing a flexible and patient-centric approach to the
delivery of non-institutional care.
VA currently provides home tele-health to 5,800 patients in 21 VISNs,
and these numbers are set to reach 12,500 patients by the end of FY
2005. To support this care, VA has developed a national home-telehealth
infrastructure that is being interfaced with VA’s computerized patient
record system (CPRS). The CPRS complements VA’s approach to managing
patients with chronic conditions via home-telehealth. Typically, these
are patients who previously had several volumes of paper charts. The
charts were often difficult to find because these patients have multiple
unscheduled clinic visits that took the chart elsewhere. Even if paper
records are readily available, the ability of a practitioner to rapidly
and accurately obtain this information during an unscheduled clinic
visit or emergency room attendance is often compromised by the volume
and unwieldy nature of paper-bound information in such complex care
patients. With a computerized patient record, the significance of
changes in vital sign data such as pulse, weight, blood pressure, and
other readily monitored indices such as blood glucose can be rapidly
interpreted and the appropriate care instituted. Simply stated, the
right information must be in the right place at the right time if the
right care is to be provided to the right patient. The outcomes of VA’s
Care Coordination Home-Telehealth show that these programs enable
veterans to remain living independently in their place of residence,
reduce the need for hospital admissions and emergency room visits, and
are associated with high levels of patient satisfaction.
Tele-mental Health
The next area of I would like to cover is tele-mental health. Clinical
studies in VA have confirmed that the use of tele-mental health results
in comparable outcomes to receiving care in traditional face-to-face
clinic settings. This care is typically provided using real-time
video-conferencing to support the clinical interaction between patient
and practitioner. Tele-mental health is able to support the delivery of
both general and specialist mental health care in VA’s community-based
outpatient clinics (CBOC). Tele-mental health can assist VA in meeting
the challenges presented by the high incidence and prevalence of
mental-health conditions in veteran patients and, in doing so, make this
care more accessible to these patients by reducing the need for travel.
Tele-mental health in VA is currently taking place in 228 sites, of
which 120 are CBOCs, 74 are VA medical centers (VAMCs), 20 Vet Centers,
and 14 home-telehealth programs. In FY 2004, VA provided direct care
through telemedicine to over 10,000 patients and this constituted over
20,000 episodes of care. VA has a lead clinician for telemental-health
who coordinates these developments in close association with VISN mental
health leads and the Mental Health Strategic Healthcare Group in VA
Central Office. Tele-mental health activity in VA is anticipated to
expand by an estimated 20 percent in FY 2005 to enable greater delivery
of specialist mental health care to CBOCs.
Tele-retinal imaging
Next I would like to turn to another crucial area of health need within
the veteran population. Twenty percent of the veteran population VA
treats has diabetes and a common and avoidable complication of diabetes,
visual impairment. VA currently outperforms the commercial managed-care
sector in screening for diabetic eye disease. Maintaining and exceeding
current rates of screening for diabetic eye disease has been the
rationale for VA in exploring the use of tele-retinal imaging to detect
diabetic eye disease.
In partnership with the Department of Defense and the Joslin Vision
Network in Boston, VA piloted tele-retinal imaging programs in six sites
since FY 2000. A consensus meeting in September 2001 helped define the
scope for the initial piloting of this technology in routine clinical
practice in that it could not replace a comprehensive eye exam and was
only suitable to assess for diabetic retinopathy.
The clinical success of these pilots and other tele-retinal imaging
programs has provided VA with evidence that tele-retinal imaging can
facilitate retinal screenings of VA’s growing diabetic population. VA
plans to implement the widespread use of tele-retinal imaging to screen
for diabetic eye disease in FY 2005 and FY 2006 and anticipates that up
to 75,000 veterans with diabetes may benefit from this program
nationally. This program will use store-and-forward technology, whereby
digital retinal images are sent to designated reading centers for
reporting.
Teledermatology
Another area of telemedicine that uses store-and-forward technology that
I would like to briefly consider is teledermatology. Skin disease is a
significant case of discomfort and morbidity in both the veteran and
general population. Dermatology is a shortage specialty especially in
rural areas.
For this reason, the VAMC in Togus, Maine, became a pioneer in the use
of teledermatology in the late 1990’s. A highly successful
teledermatology service was established between Togus VAMC and the VAMC
in Providence, Rhode Island, which is an ongoing source of care to
veterans in rural Maine. VA has subsequently shown that the use of
teledermatology can result in treatment being initiated earlier than for
patients receiving usual care, and diminish the need for a subsequent
face-to-face dermatology clinic appointment.
Teledermatology is cost-effective in decreasing the time required for
patients to reach a point of initial definitive care. VA has identified
a clinician lead, a research lead, and a field telehealth coordinator
for teledermatology who continues to refine and develop teledermatology
services in VA.
Telerehabilitation
A critical area of current telemedicine development in VA is tele-rehabilitation.
This new technology is supporting veterans who have had spinal cord
injury, veterans suffering from multiple sclerosis, and combat-wounded
veterans from Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom. The
benefits of telemedicine to these combat-wounded veterans highlights the
positive role telemedicine can play.
VA has established four national poly-trauma centers to care for
combat-wounded veterans who are transferred to VA after receiving care
in specialist military treatment facilities. The poly-trauma centers
take these patients, who often have had head injuries, eye traumas,
amputations, and post-traumatic stress disorder, and prepare them to
return home.
Let me give you the hypothetical example of a combat-wounded veteran
with a complex prosthetic limb that enables a return to an active
lifestyle. The challenge presents when this veteran returns home to a
remote rural part of the United States. If this veteran has a problem
and needs care, it is unlikely that a practitioner in a CBOC or small
VAMC will have the expertise to address the constellation of injuries.
This expertise will not be available in the private sector locally. The
dilemma this presents is that the veteran may be unnecessarily
transferred back to a VA poly-trauma center or specialist military
treatment facility with all the attendant inconvenience to the patient
together with disruptions to work and family, in addition to incurring
avoidable cost to VA.
To address this dilemma, in FY 2005, VA is linking current
rehabilitation capacity at the local level to the specialist expertise
in various areas. Telemedicine is being introduced across the continuum
of care to ensure that combat-wounded heroes stay in close touch with
specialist care in the Polytrauma Centers as VA works to return them to
their homes. Furthermore, VA has been working since 1999 to use
telehealth services to enhance the care and home-based rehabilitation of
patients with spinal cord injuries. VA is also working towards building
a specialist referral network for rehabilitation that will connect its
multiple-sclerosis centers of excellence on the West and East coasts
with smaller VHA facilities to provide this specialist expertise at a
local level.
Telesurgery
Given my earlier emphasis on chronic conditions, VA’s development of
telesurgery may seem somewhat surprising. However, there are many parts
of the United States where rising property prices have meant veterans
have sold their homes or have difficulty finding rental accommodation.
Consequently, many veterans are moving to other areas of states that are
remote from VA’s large fixed sites of care where their surgery may be
performed.
VA’s development of tele-surgery is, therefore, taking place to
establish telemedicine links to enable remote evaluation of veteran
patients, both prior to surgery and post-operatively. These specialist
clinics either save patients from traveling long-distances to specialist
centers or specialist surgeons from having to travel to remote clinics,
which hinders them from seeing other patients during this period of
travel.
Telemedicine – The Future
In all of the five areas of care I have just covered, a consistent theme
has been how telemedicine increases access to care for veteran patients
who live in rural locations. A specific example of the benefits
telemedicine can bring relates to the VAMC in Iron Mountain, Michigan.
In the late 1990s, when the pathologist at the Iron Mountain VAMC
retired, it was difficult to replace this clinician. This placed at risk
those services that required pathology support in Michigan's Upper
Peninsula and northeastern Wisconsin. VA resolved this problem using
tele-pathology within a five-state telehealth network in VISN 12 that
integrates data, voice, video, and imaging systems -- thereby creating
one of the largest specialty care telehealth networks in the US. This
network enables primary diagnosis and consultation in surgical
pathology, interpretation of serum protein electrophoresis and
immunofixation gels, provision of support for consolidated microbiology
laboratories, review of problematic peripheral blood smears, and
distance learning. Telemedicine is able to help prevent the loss of
mission critical services, which can pose a threat to the sustainability
of services in rural areas.
The evidence-base to support telemedicine in VA is growing. Typically
evidence about new health care lags behind clinical practice by five
years, and it can take 15 years for established evidence to be
introduced into clinical practice. VA is introducing telemedicine where
there is evidence that it is safe and effective and is using it to meet
areas of high priority need in the veteran population. VA researchers
have published more than 50 peer-reviewed articles published in this
area since the early 1990’s.
VA’s Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) explicitly looks at
the issues of translating important clinical and health research
findings into everyday practice. This approach allows VA to accelerate
the rate of change in critical areas where research findings could have
significant system wide impact. The QUERI is addressing the
implementation of telemedicine with a particular emphasis on home-telehealth.
VA has lead practitioners in the areas of home telehealth, telemental
health, teledermatology, telesurgery, teleophthalmology, teleoptometry,
and telerehabilitation. The role of these practitioners is to develop
toolkits that standardize telemedicine practice across VA, and act as
clinical champions. The importance of standardizing telemedicine
practice to VA is three-fold. First, it facilitates telemedicine
development. Second, it enables systematic outcomes analysis and
research to take place. Third, it means that veteran patients receive
consistent care via telemedicine across the system.
VA established a training center for care coordination home telehealth
in Lake City, Florida in January 2004. This center has trained over
1,100 staff since then using distance education technologies, and 1500
through face-to-face teaching methods. In FY 2005, VA expects to
establish a general telemedicine training center in Salt Lake City,
Utah, and a training center for teleretinal imaging in Boston,
Massachusetts. All these centers have connections with academic centers
and will produce designated curricula for telemedicine training that
will ensure that practitioners receive appropriate training. Training is
a key element to sustaining telemedicine in VA. Without a
telemedicine-competent workforce, key services to veteran patients in
remote areas could be vulnerable.
VA has robust cross-federal partnerships with the Department of Defense
and with the Department of Health and Human Services (HSS). A recent
meeting of the IHS/VHA steering group in Albuquerque identified a
joint-working group between IHS and VA on Care Coordination as a
priority. VA is a member of the Joint Working Group on Telehealth, a
Federal interagency group that coordinates members' telehealth
activities. These partnerships reinforce the finding that robust
business processes to code, provide workload credit, and fund
telemedicine from routine operational sources are as vital an ingredient
in the successful implementation of telemedicine as are the clinical
science and technology infrastructure. VA is implementing systematic
coding systems for telemedicine in FY 2005 and FY 2006. VA is working
with national accreditation bodies to ensure that telemedicine programs
are recognized as part of routine care delivery.
In concluding, I would like to mention that VA is now recognized as a
leader in the field of telemedicine as it is in other areas relating to
the clinical use of health information technologies. The work that I
have highlighted today attests to VA’s leadership in this area and is
the product of collaborative relationships within and outside VA. The
benefits of telemedicine are that it can help coordinate care across the
continuum of care and bridge barriers of distance and geography that
hinder delivery of care. In accomplishing this, telemedicine connects
across parts of the organization in VA to draw upon existing strengths
and has not been associated with the creation of a new silo of care. I
am proud to be associated with an organization and colleagues with a
unique mission to deliver care to veterans.
To complete this first panel session, I would like to introduce Dr. Ross
Fletcher who is the Chief of Staff at the Washington DC VA Medical
Center. Dr. Fletcher is also the Director of the nationwide Veterans
Affairs registry for the Pacemaker and Defibrillator Surveillance
Center. Dr. Fletcher was involved in the development of VA’s
computerized patient record. Dr. Fletcher will provide a practical
demonstration of how the use of home-telehealth and care coordination
impacts on the care of patients and is truly delivering the right care
in the right place at the right time.
Following Dr. Fletcher’s demonstration, he and I will be happy to answer
any questions the members of the Subcommittee might have.
|