STATEMENT OF
JOSEPH C. SHARPE JR., DEPUTY DIRECTOR
ECONOMIC COMMISSION
THE AMERICAN LEGION
TO THE
SUBCOMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY
COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
ON
VA’S VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AND EMPLOYMENT SERVICE
AND
THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR’S VETERANS’ EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING SERVICE
MARCH 9, 2006
Mr. Chairman and distinguished members of the Subcommittee, thank you
for the opportunity to submit the views of The American Legion regarding
the Department of Veterans Affairs’ Vocational Rehabilitation and
Education (VR&E) program and the Department of Labor’s Veterans’
Employment and Training Service (VETS).
VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AND EMPLOYMENT SERVICE
The mission of the VR&E program is to help qualified, service-disabled
veterans achieve independence in daily living and, to the maximum extent
feasible, obtain and maintain suitable employment. The American Legion
fully supports these goals.
As a nation at war, there continues to be an increasing need for VR&E
services to assist Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom
veterans in retraining to independent living, achieving the highest
possible quality of life, and securing meaningful employment. To meet
America’s obligation to these specific veterans and other eligible VR&E
veterans, VA leadership must focus on marked improvements in case
management, vocational counseling, and most importantly job placement.
The successful rehabilitation of our severely disabled veterans is
determined by the coordinated efforts of every Federal agency (DoD, VA,
DoL, OPM, HUD etc.) involved in the seamless transition from the
battlefield to the civilian workplace. Timely access to quality health
care services, favorable physical rehabilitation, vocational training,
and job placement play a critical role in the seamless transition of
each and every veteran, as well as his or her family.
Administration of VR&E and its programs is a responsibility of the
Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA). Historically, VBA has placed
emphasis on the processing of veterans’ claims and the reduction of the
claims backlog, which is extremely important. However, providing
effective employment programs through VR&E must become a priority as
well.
Until recently, VR&E’s primary focus has been providing veterans with
skills training, rather than obtaining meaningful employment. Clearly,
any employability plan that doesn’t achieve the ultimate objective a job
is an injustice to those veterans seeking assistance in transitioning
into the civilian workforce.
Vocational counseling plays a vital role in identifying barriers to
employment that must be overcome, as well as matching veterans’ skills
with those career opportunities available to qualified candidates.
Becoming fully qualified becomes the next logical objective towards
successful transition.
Veterans’ preference should play a large role in vocational counseling
as well. The Federal government has scores of employment opportunities
that educated, well-trained, and motivated veterans can fill given a
fair and equitable chance to compete. Working together, all Federal
agencies should identify those vocational fields, especially those with
high turnover rates, suitable for VR&E applicants. Career fields like
information technology, claims adjudications, and debt collection offer
employment opportunities and challenges for career-oriented applicants
that also create career opportunities outside the Federal government.
Historically, VA has been lacking in its efforts to find employment for
disabled veterans. The Vocational Rehabilitation program has
historically been marketed to veterans as an education program and not
an employment program. A majority of veterans attended universities and
colleges with few enrolled in training programs, such as apprenticeships
and on-the-job training that can lead to direct job placement.
However, in FY 04 the VR&E service program instituted a number of
recommended changes to re-focus the program into becoming more
employment oriented. A five-track employment pilot project was initiated
in October 2004 and completed on September 30, 2005. This pilot project
titled the “5-Track Employment Model” includes a “Job Resource Lab”
comprised of:
• An Employment Resource Center for:
Veterans
Employment Coordinators
Vocational Rehabilitation Counselors and Counseling Psychologist
• Resource for Labor Market Information
• Resource for Job Readiness Assistance
• Internet-Based Employment Resource
• An on-line employment services system to support
Veterans
VR&E staff
Working Partners
• Virtual one-stop employment network
Material taken from a 2006 VR&E report explaining Vocational
Rehabilitation and Employment Five-Tracks to Employment Pilot Project
Results.
The VR&E’s Job Resource Labs are expected to be in all VA regional
offices by the end of 2006. The American Legion supports the creation of
these important offices.
Another problem hindering the effectiveness of the VR&E program as
previously cited in reports by the Government Accountability Office
(GAO) is exceptionally high workloads for the limited number of staff.
This hinders the staff’s ability to effectively assist individual
veterans with identifying employment opportunities.
In April 2005, the average caseload of a typical VR&E counselor
approached 160 veterans. The American Legion applauds the proposed
increase of an additional 128 Direct and Support FTE’s. While The
American Legion is pleased that an additional number of FTE will be
hired, we still urge Congress to provide further funding for VR&E
counselors in FY 2007 for an expected increase of veterans that will
need assistance.
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
The 2004 VA Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment Task Force reported
that the VR&E program had not made any significant improvements since
the 1996 GAO report on the lack of effective job assistance being
provided to disabled veterans. In recent years, many states have not
referred veterans from the VR&E program to VETS for assistance in
obtaining employment. Veterans with high-tech skills and advanced
education were referred to expensive commercial placement agencies that
do not specialize in employment assistance for veterans and difficult to
place veterans were sent to VETS.
Therefore, to correct these deficiencies, a memorandum of agreement
between VA and DOL was developed and signed in October 2005 stating that
each agency had the mutual responsibility and concern to assist disabled
veterans in their readjustment into the civilian workforce. This
memorandum provided that “in order to advance, improve, and expand the
employment opportunities for veterans with disabilities, both parties of
this MOU commit themselves to active cooperation and coordination in
meeting the goals set forth in this agreement”.
In discussions with numerous VETS representatives across the country,
The American Legion is hearing a variety of opinions on the current
implementation process and progress of the recently signed MOU. VR&E
representatives from Michigan have reported “more referrals then we can
handle” due to the shortages of DVOPs and LVERs and the worsening
employment situation in the state.
VETS representatives in Tennessee stated that they are already doing
what is required in the MOU and that they have a strong relationship
with the local VR&E office. In the state of Maryland, the director of
VETS reports that in the city of Baltimore they already enjoy a good
working relationship with the VR&E office. Now with the signing of the
MOU that relationship will expand to the rest of the state, and will
include the District of Columbia and Virginia as well. The State of
Maryland VETS Office will begin joint training programs with the VR&E
counselors on March 24th.
The story is quite different in the state of Texas. The VETS program and
the VR&E program in Texas are completely separate. The Texas VETS
representative explained that they do not see referrals from the local
VR&E Office and they in turn do not communicate. Finally, the VETS State
Director in Alabama reports some cooperation between the two agencies is
taking place but it is difficult to encourage the two organizations to
work together on the local level. Concerns such as education levels of
VA’s case managers and DOL DVOPs and LVERs (case managers from the VA
generally have BA or MA degrees while the DVOPs and LVERs require only a
high school education), job philosophies, and performance standards are
cited as problems that affect the delivery of employment and rehab
services to veterans.
While poor coordination between VR&E counselors and their VETS
counterparts has contributed to the shortfalls of the VR&E program, a
number of states have begun to improve communications. The outlook is
not completely negative. A majority of VETS representatives have
commended their VR&E counterparts for their willingness to ensure the
successful implementation of the joint MOU that is designed to improve
rehabilitation, training and employment outcomes for disabled veterans.
REHABILITATION AND EMPLOYMENT OUTCOMES
Numbers of Rehabilitated/Employed Veterans
Year Veterans successfully rehabilitated YEAR Veterans successfully
employed with suitable jobs
FY 03 9,549 FY 03 7,525
FY 04 11,129 FY 04 8,392
FY 05 12,013 FY 05 9,279
The above demonstrates the improved outcomes for the VR&E program.
The average salary for the 9,300 veterans rehabilitated in suitable
employment was $39,160.
The American Legion has recommended exploring possible training programs
geared specifically for VR&E Counselors through the National Veterans
Training Institute (NVTI). Contracting for standardized or specialized
training for VR&E employees could very well strengthen and improve
overall program performance. NVTI serves as a valuable resource for VETS
employment specialists and has contributed to a marked improvement in
VETS performance. We are pleased to note that VETS and VR&E
representatives report that VR&E counselors began training at the NVTI
site in January 2006.
MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The American Legion applauds the efforts of VR&E to create and publish
national performance standards for both the VR&E Officer position and
the Vocational Rehabilitation Counselor/Counseling Psychologist
positions. The progress that management is making will go a long way in
ensuring an adequate system for evaluating the effectiveness of the VR&E
Service in place.
It seems that the VR&E program has remained in a perpetual state of
transition for the past 25 years, according to countless GAO and VA
reports. The 2004 Task Force report stated that the VR&E system must be
redesigned for the 21st Century employment environment. The American
Legion continues to support strong leadership and continued verification
of the recommendations made in the 2004 task force report.
Adequate funding is needed to assist the management staff of VR&E to
continue its implementation of the recommendations. The American Legion
applauds the President’s request for $149 million to fund the
discretionary portion of the Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment
program in 2007. Additional FTE requirements along with an increased
workload of veterans expected to use the program services requires this
additional funding.
The American Legion strongly supports both of these important programs
and is committed to working with both agencies to ensure that America’s
veterans are provided with the highest level of employment assistance.
Again, thank you for the opportunity to submit the opinion of The
American Legion on this issue.
|