STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD
STATEMENT OF
DAVID G. GREINEDER
AMVETS DEPUTY NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE DIRECTOR
BEFORE THE
COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS
SUBCOMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
ON
THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AND EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM
THURSDAY, MARCH 9, 2006
334 CANNON HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING
10:00AM
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Summary of Findings
• Over the past two decades, the VR&E program has been reviewed,
assessed, and audited at least 24 times in external and internal
reports, often by GAO.
• The March 2004 Task Force report to Congress recommended changes to
the VR&E program. Frankly, AMVETS has yet to see evidence that VR&E
efforts to obtain jobs for rehabilitated veterans are successful.
• AMVETS is very concerned that VR&E puts an emphasis on training, not
employment services and employment results.
• In October 2005, VA and DOL signed a memorandum of understanding
committing to work together to maximize employment services to veterans.
• We are hopeful the MOU will form a bond between the two departments
and enhance employment services to veterans.
• AMVETS certainly agrees with the points made in the MOU, and is
hopeful the departments will follow through on their promises.
Recommendations
1. AMVETS recommends VR&E put more focus on employment services and
needs for returning servicemembers, specifically the disabled.
2. AMVETS recommends Congress evaluate the impact of disabilities on
immediate and long-term employment barriers in determining eligibility
for VR&E services, including making extensions beyond the 12 delimiting
date.
3. AMVETS recommends VR&E reduce the caseload from the current 145 cases
to a more manageable level of 100 cases per counselor.
4. AMVETS recommends VR&E modernize its technology and file sharing
systems to allow for better communication with agencies, contractors,
employment services and outside partnership entities.
Chairman Boozman, Ranking Member Herseth, and members of the
Subcommittee:
On behalf of the nationwide membership of AMVETS, I am pleased to offer
our views and recommendations to the Subcommittee on Economic
Opportunity regarding the Department of Veterans Affairs Vocational
Rehabilitation and Employment (VR&E) program.
AMVETS applauds this Subcommittee and its efforts to again examine VA’s
VR&E program. AMVETS is a staunch advocate of providing veterans with
appropriate benefits and services earned through honorable military
service. As a leader in helping to preserve the freedoms secured by
America's Armed Forces, our organization continues its proud tradition
providing not only support for veterans and the active military in
procuring their earned entitlements, but also an array of community
services that enhance the quality of life for this nation's citizens.
Mr. Chairman, the VR&E program is designed to help veterans with
service-connected disabilities to prepare for, find, and keep suitable
employment. Disabled veterans rated at 10 percent or more can apply for
VR&E training and services within 12 years from the date of their
service-connected award rating. With thousands of disabled veterans
returning home every month, it is critical that the VR&E program provide
our injured soldiers with a seamless transition from the military to
successful rehabilitation and on to suitable employment.
The federal government has a special obligation to disabled veterans.
Veterans with disabilities often encounter barriers to their entry into
the workforce, lack accommodations on the job, or have difficulty
obtaining appropriate training, education, and job skills. These
difficulties in turn can contribute to low labor force participation
rates and high levels of reliance on public benefits.
Over the years, many critiques have been written about the VR&E program.
In the past two decades, VR&E has been reviewed, assessed, and audited
at least 24 times in separate external and internal reports, often by
GAO. In response to the criticism, former VA Secretary Anthony Principi
formed the Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment Task Force. The
Secretary’s intent was to conduct an “unvarnished top to bottom
independent examination, evaluation, and analysis” of VR&E. The Task
Force interviewed countless VR&E counselors, heard testimonials from
users of the system, and solicited many outside and independent
opinions. AMVETS contends the solid recommendations suggested in the
report will enhance the opportunities and services that can enable
veterans to obtain and maintain suitable employment.
In March 2004, the Task Force released its report to Congress,
recommending many needed changes to the VR&E program. AMVETS looks
forward to seeing these recommendations implemented, but frankly, we
still have seen little evidence that VR&E efforts are successful. In the
report, the Task Force identified several key problem areas that still
needs to be addressed. For example:
1. The VR&E program has not been a VBA priority in terms of returning
veterans with service-connected disabilities to the workforce.
2. The VR&E program emphasizes education and not employment.
3. The VR&E program has limited capacities to manage the growing
workload.
4. The VR&E program must be redesigned for the 21st century.
AMVETS annually comments on the VR&E program in The Independent Budget,
and makes recommendations that would allow the program to meet its
ongoing workload demand and implement new initiatives recommended by the
Task Force. Since we have been examining VR&E, we have been concerned
the program puts an emphasis on training, not employment services and
employment results. Reports have shown that veterans were declared
rehabilitated without providing sufficient follow-up activities to make
sure that the goal of long-term suitable employment was achieved. And,
VR&E did not prioritize veterans with severe service-connected
disabilities.
AMVETS believes that VR&E needs to put more focus on employment services
and needs for returning soldiers, specifically the disabled. Initial
service-connected disabilities or conditions may increase in severity
over time and adversely effect the earning capacity or employability for
the veteran. We have heard reports that some disabled veterans who have
applied for, and were awarded, a higher disability rating were denied VR&E
services because they were beyond the 12 year rule from their initial
rating date. We recommend that Congress evaluate the impact of
disabilities on immediate and long-term employment barriers in
determining eligibility for VR&E services, including making extensions
beyond the 12 delimiting date.
The success of transitioning disabled veterans to the workforce relies
heavily on VR&E’s ability to provide services in a timely and effective
manner. Unfortunately, the demand and expectations being placed on staff
are exceeding the capacity to effectively deliver a full continuum of
services. VR&E has been experiencing a shortage of staff nationwide due
to insufficient funding, which has caused delays in providing services
to disabled veterans. There are currently 65,000 veterans applying for
VR&E services, compared to 45,000 in FY2000. At present, there are more
than 96,000 veterans in various phases of VR&E compared to 70,000 in
FY2000. Furthermore, there is a waiting list of more than 8,000 veterans
wanting to access VR&E services. To meet these growing demands, AMVETS
recommends VR&E reduce the caseload from he current 145 cases to a more
manageable level of 100 cases per counselor.
AMVETS believes the VR&E program needs to drastically modernize its
technology and file sharing systems. VR&E implemented its current case
management and information system, WINRS, in 1997. WINRS refined and
expanded the functions of the VR&E system to allow management and
sharing claims information by VA offices nationwide. This was a good
start. However, in today’s information technology age, VA now needs a
web-based system to allow for a more efficient way of sharing
information with agencies, contractors, employment services and outside
partnership entities. We recommend Congress provide the necessary
resources in FY07 to expand and implement new technologies to VR&E’s
case management and file sharing information systems.
Some reports raised concerns about the failure of coordination between
federal departments and agencies. Recognizing the need for a
collaborative effort between the VA and DOL, the two departments signed
a memorandum of understanding (MOU) in October 2005, committing to work
together to maximize employment services to veterans. We are hopeful the
MOU will form a bond between the two departments and enhance their
employment services. The MOU promises data sharing activities,
establishes management information systems, forms three joint working
groups, and appoints a point of contact for the provision of employment
services. AMVETS certainly agrees with the all the items in the MOU and
is hopeful the departments will follow through on their promises. We
will continue to reach out to VA and DOL-VETS and gladly offer them any
assistance we can provide.
For the service-connected disabled veterans returning home, and for
those who served before, we must do all we can to strengthen the VR&E
program and learn from its shortcomings. It is now time that the
suggestions and recommendations made by the VSOs and the Task Force be
seriously considered. It is our hope that immediate and concrete actions
will be made so veterans have access to service that is timely,
effective, and efficient. It is good public policy and it is the right
thing to do.
In closing Mr. Chairman, AMVETS looks forward to working with you and
others in Congress to ensure we continue to update and improve the
earned benefits of America’s veterans and their families. As we find
ourselves in times that threaten our very freedom, our nation must never
forget those who ensure our freedom endures. AMVETS thanks the panel for
the opportunity to address this issue.
Mr. Chairman, this concludes my testimony. I thank you again for the
privilege to present our views and recommendations.
Thank you.
David G. Greineder
AMVETS Deputy National Legislative Director
David Greineder joined AMVETS (American Veterans) on May 10, 2004. As
the Deputy National Legislative Director (currently serving as Acting
National Legislative Director), he is the primary individual responsible
for promoting AMVETS legislative, national security, and foreign affairs
goals before the administration and the Congress of the United States.
Prior to assuming his current position, David worked nearly five years
on Capitol Hill as a legislative staff aide in the offices of
Pennsylvania Reps. George W. Gekas and Timothy F. Murphy. He was a key
policy advisor for a wide range of issues, including veterans’ affairs,
and helped manage federal appropriations efforts in both congressional
offices.
David completed undergraduate work at Millersville University of
Pennsylvania, where he was an assistant of data collection for the
Keystone Poll.
AMVETS National Headquarters
4647 Forbes Boulevard
Lanham, MD 20706
Telephone: 301-459-9600
Fax: 301-459-7924
Email: dgreineder@amvets.org
March 9, 2006
The Honorable John Boozman, Chairman
Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
House Veterans’ Affairs Committee
Cannon House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515
Dear Chairman Boozman:
Neither AMVETS nor I have received any federal grants or contracts,
during this year or in the last two years, from any agency or program
relevant to the March 9, 2006 Subcommittee hearing on the U.S.
Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Rehabilitation and Employment
program.
Sincerely,
David G. Greineder
Deputy National Legislative Director
|