Opening Statement of
John A. Gauss
Former Assistant Secretary for Information and Technology
And Chief Information Officer
At the Department of Veterans Affairs
Before the
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations
Committee on Veterans’ Affairs
U. S. House of Representatives
June 28, 2006Good morning, Mr. Chairman and
members of the Subcommittee. Thank you for inviting me here today to
discuss the important issues related to the Information Technology (IT)
reorganization efforts at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).
I would like to provide the Committee with some background information
to help in understanding my thought process regarding VA’s IT
reorganization.
At the time of my confirmation hearing as the VA’s Chief Information
Officer (CIO), the Department was faced with:
(1) An ever expanding IT budget;
(2) Programs that were defined in a “stovepipe” manner due to the lack
of an Enterprise Architecture;
(3) Programs that were consistently overrunning budget, behind schedule,
and failing to meet their performance requirements;
(4) Implementing a comprehensive cyber security program; and,
(5) Having to implement an “executive level” oversight process which was
a recurring deficiency identified by the General Accountability Office
(GAO).
As a result of the above and as presented in my opening statement before
the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee on 2 August 2001 during my
confirmation hearing, I stated that I had five strategic objectives:
(1) Complete the Enterprise Architecture road map to the future;
(2) Integrate disparate telecommunications networks to improve
performance and responsiveness for our Veterans;
(3) Implement a strong information security program and infrastructure;
(4) Create a program/project management process to oversee and help the
VA information technology program/project managers deliver products that
meet requirements, are delivered on time, and stay within budget; and,
(5) Establish information technology metrics to continuously measure our
ability to meet our Veterans’ needs.
Although implementing a strong information security program is listed as
number 3 in the above list, it was my number one priority. Establishing
a comprehensive Enterprise Architecture and integrating the
telecommunications networks were placed higher in the order since I
believe they are prerequisites to attacking the number one priority.
During my previous 32 year career in the United States Navy, I learned
to address organizational issues by using the following simple thought
process:
(1) Define the problem to be solved;
(2) Define the optimal, affordable solution to the problem;
(3) Define what work would be accomplished by government and what work
would be performed by industry; then,
(4) Organize to implement.
Given the problems and strategic objectives defined above, I concluded
that:
(1) All IT programs and IT-related activities affecting the three
Administrations and the VA Central Office should be centrally managed at
the Department level with funding located in the Department’s and not
the Administrations’ budgets. Specifically:
(a) Enterprise Architecture;
(b) Cyber Security except facility-specific Information Security
Officers (ISOs);
(c) Telecommunications networks;
(d) Corporate data centers;
(e) Any program with the above characteristics that would result from
developing a comprehensive Enterprise Architecture, such as VA-wide
Registration and Eligibility and a central Call Center; and,
(f) All IT programs under the auspices of any VA Central Office staff
code.
(2) All development activities related to individual Administration IT
programs should be managed at the Department level with funding from the
Administration with the requirement for the program.
(3) The operations and maintenance of in-service IT systems directly
related to mission execution within an Administration should be managed
by that Administration subject to a comprehensive budget and funding
execution approval process with ultimate authority for approving the
expenditure of funds residing in the office of the Department’s CIO.
I recognize that the above conclusions are not consistent with current
thinking, but I would respectfully ask the Committee to consider the
following: without central management of the development activities, how
will the Department ever implement a comprehensive department-wide
Enterprise Architecture to eliminate duplication; cross-functionally
integrate VA’s IT business processes; and ultimately slow or stop the
growth of the department’s IT budget?
I hope information I have provided will help the Committee in its
deliberations regarding VA’s IT reorganization.
Thank you for this opportunity to discuss these very important IT
issues. I will be happy to answer your questions. |