STATEMENT of
THE MILITARY COALITION (TMC)
June 29, 2005
Presented by
Colonel Robert F. Norton, USA (Ret.)
Co-Chairman, Veterans’ Committee
The Military Coalition
MISTER CHAIRMAN AND DISTINGUISHED MEMBERS
OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE. On behalf of The Military Coalition, a consortium
of nationally prominent uniformed services and veterans’ organizations,
we are grateful to the Subcommittee for this opportunity to express our
views concerning the transition assistance and disabled transition
assistance programs of the Departments of Defense, Veterans Affairs and
Labor. This testimony provides the collective views of the following
military and veterans’ organizations, which represent approximately 5.5
million current and former members of the seven uniformed services, plus
their families and survivors.
• Air Force Association
• Air Force Sergeants Association
• Air Force Women Officers Associated
• American Logistics Association
• AMVETS (American Veterans)
• Army Aviation Association of America
• Association of Military Surgeons of the United States
• Association of the United States Army
• Chief Warrant Officer and Warrant Officer Association, U.S. Coast
Guard
• Commissioned Officers Association of the U.S. Public Health Service,
Inc.
• Enlisted Association of the National Guard of the United States
• Fleet Reserve Association
• Gold Star Wives of America, Inc.
• Jewish War Veterans of the United States of America
• Marine Corps League
• Marine Corps Reserve Association
• Military Chaplains Association of the United States of America
• Military Officers Association of America
• Military Order of the Purple Heart
• National Association for Uniformed Services
• National Guard Association of the United States
• National Military Family Association
• National Order of Battlefield Commissions
• Naval Enlisted Reserve Association
• Naval Reserve Association
• Navy League of the United States
• Non Commissioned Officers Association
• Reserve Enlisted Association of the United States
• Reserve Officers Association
• Society of Medical Consultants to the Armed Forces
• The Retired Enlisted Association
• United Armed Forces Association
• United States Army Warrant Officers Association
• United States Coast Guard Chief Petty Officers Association
• Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States
• Veterans' Widows International Network
The Military Coalition, Inc., does not receive any grants or contracts
from the federal government.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Increase Transition Assistance Program and Disabled Transition
Assistance Program (TAP / DTAP) Resources. Federal agency budgets for
TAP / DTAP have been flat for 10 years and do not take into account the
mobilization of nearly 500,000 members of the Guard and Reserve since
9/11. The Military Coalition strongly recommends that the Departments of
Defense, Veterans Affairs, and Labor increase their TAP / DTAP budgets
to accommodate the growing number of National Guard and Reserve service
members eligible for these programs.
Tailor TAP / DTAP Programs to the Needs of Active and Reserve Troops.
TAP / DTAP programs were developed in the early 1990’s to support the
post-Cold War draw down of active duty troops. The unique needs of
demobilizing Guard and Reserve troops and their families have not been
fully assessed. TMC endorses the GAO’s recommendation that the
Departments of Defense, Veterans Affairs, and Labor must determine what
Guard and Reserve servicemembers need to make a smooth transition back
to civilian life.
Mandatory vs. Optional Components of TAP / DTAP. By statute, only the
Pre-Separation Counseling component of TAP is mandatory for separating
servicemembers. Service TAP representatives recently recommended that
the other three elements of TAP / DTAP be required at separation. This
may make sense for active duty troops, but not necessarily reserve
component troops. The Military Coalition urges further study of
mandating all TAP components for de-mobilizing Reserve troops. TMC
strongly supports expansion of post-separation TAP activities such as
veterans’ benefits briefings, employment workshops and family counseling
for de-mobilized Guard and Reserve troops.
TAP / DTAP Checklists. Efforts are underway to refine and improve
checklists to support TAP activities for active duty and reserve
component troops. Appendix VII of the GAO Report illustrates changes
that are to be implemented this year. TMC recommends that DoD / DVA /
DoJ be required to report on measures taken to improve TAP processes and
procedures (including TAP checklists) for the active and reserve forces.
TMC also recommends expanding DTAP checklists to include mental health
counseling to ensure spouse / caregiver and community support resources
are identified and a process is in place to ensure follow through in the
community.
Balancing Employment Workshop and Veterans Benefits TAP Components.
Presently, the Employment Workshop component of TAP consumes 2 to 2.5
days of the total TAP process, but only a few hours is devoted to the
Veterans Benefits Component of TAP. The Military Coalition recommends
expansion of the veterans benefits component of the TAP / DTAP program,
and use of post-separation VA benefits briefings in communities and
reserve centers.
Integrate “Seamless Transition” Initiatives into the TAP / DTAP
Programs. Accelerated development of an electronic DD-214,
bi-directional medical records, expanded Benefits Delivery at Discharge
activities, a one-stop separation physical, family support services, and
related initiatives can markedly improve the outcomes intended for the
TAP / DTAP programs. TMC recommends a “Manhattan Project” to speed the
development and implementation of “seamless transition” initiatives to
support more effective delivery of TAP services.
OVERVIEW
Mr. Chairman, The Military Coalition (TMC) thanks you and the entire
Subcommittee for your interest in ensuring adequate support and
transition services for members of the armed forces, including activated
members of the National Guard and Reserve, who complete their military
obligations and return to civilian life. Family members are also in need
of transition assistance information and support, since a majority of
military members -- active duty and reserve component -- are married
when they separate from the service.
TMC was asked to provide its views on the overall Transition Assistance
and Disabled Transition Assistance Programs (TAP / DTAP) and
specifically to address issues and recommendations raised by the
Government Accountability Office (GAO) in its report, Enhanced Services
Could Improve Transition Assistance for Reserves and National Guard
(GAO-05-544).
In testimony today, The Military Coalition offers its collective
recommendations on what needs to be done to address the concerns raised
by the GAO regarding TAP / DTAP services for National Guard and Reserve
servicemembers and their families.
Transition Program in Transition.
Since September 11, 2001, nearly 480,000 members of the National Guard
and Reserve forces have been mobilized. That represents about 55% of the
Selected Reserve force structure – units and individuals of the Guard
and Reserve who train regularly and are subject to recall to active duty
by the Commander-in-Chief. At the pace of current activations, it’s
reasonable to project that within just a few years the entire Selected
Reserve will have served at least one tour of active duty that would
qualify for TAP / DTAP services.
About two years into the War on Terrorism, the Defense Department
announced a major shift in its policy towards the use of Guard and
Reserve forces. The new policy calls for the routine call-up of those
forces every five or six years for the foreseeable future. The Total
Force Policy in the 21st century contemplates the use of these forces
for every operational commitment. Many Guard and Reserve units already
have served multiple tours of active duty since 9/11 with only a very
brief turnaround time between call-ups.
In this context, TMC is concerned with the GAO’s observation that the
TAP / DTAP remains focused only on the needs of separating active duty
service men and women. The GAO Report states that “[A]lthough the
Reserves and National Guard were specifically identified in the law that
established TAP [1990], the program was designed to meet the needs of
full-time active duty service members because most Reserve and National
Guard members had not served in an active duty capacity long enough to
be eligible for TAP.” (p. 10)
Under the new policy of routine reserve call-ups, DoD should have taken
the lead in consultation with the VA and Department of Labor (DoL) to
tailor the TAP / DTAP program to accommodate its reserve activation
policy.
The GAO Report also notes that TAP resources have been “flat since
fiscal year 1995” and that DoD’s budget assumes only a steady-state of
200,000 full-time active duty personnel have been eligible for TAP since
2001. [Appendix III, p. 31] In other words, DoD has not identified any
additional resources for the nearly 500,000 National Guard and Reserve
service men and women called up since 9/11. In 2004 alone, 117,000
members of the Guard and Reserve were released from active duty [p.5],
yet no additional resources were sought to expand and refine TAP
services unique to their needs.
The Military Coalition strongly recommends that the Departments of
Defense, Veterans Affairs, and Labor increase their TAP / DTAP budgets
to accommodate the growing number of National Guard and Reserve service
members eligible for these programs. TMC also strongly endorses the
GAO’s recommendation that the Departments must determine what Guard and
Reserve servicemembers need to make a smooth transition back to civilian
life.
SPECIFIC TAP / DTAP ISSUES for the NATIONAL GUARD and RESERVE
Mandatory vs. Optional TAP Components for Reserve Troops
Only the Pre-Separation Counseling phase of TAP is required by law. The
Employment Workshop, Veterans’ Benefits, and Disabled TAP (DTAP)
components are optional for separating service men and women, including
de-mobilizing Guard and Reserve servicemembers.
The GAO Report notes that, recently, TAP service representatives at DOD
proposed to the Secretary of Defense that participation in TAP be
mandatory (p. 20). This may make sense for active duty servicemembers,
but it may be counter-productive for Guard and Reserve troops. A number
of factors militate against a mandatory TAP program during the
de-mobilization process:
• Demobilizing Guard and Reserve troops are anxious to return to their
civilian communities (whereas active duty troops usually take TAP at
their installation of assignment);
• Reserve component spouses are unable to participate in TAP at
de-mobilization sites;
• Guard and Reserve troops are “outside the control of TAP managers”
(p.14);
• Currently configured TAP services may not meet the needs of Guard and
Reserve troops
It may make sense to require participation in some TAP components
besides Pre-separation counseling. TMC, however, agrees with the GAO
that the needs of de-mobilizing Guard and Reserve troops ought to be
defined more precisely first. In addition, innovative delivery of TAP
services in local communities, through the internet, or through
state-level offices may make more sense than a one-size fits all
approach.
The Military Coalition urges further study of mandating all TAP
components for de-mobilizing Reserve troops. TMC strongly supports
expansion of post-separation TAP activities such as veterans’ benefits
briefings, employment workshops and family counseling for de-mobilized
Guard and Reserve troops.
Additional Support for Disabled Transition Assistance Program
Participants
Disabled servicemembers and their families need and deserve additional
support as they depart the military environment back to the civilian
community. TMC commends the DoD and VA for inviting military and
veterans’ service organizations to increase their sponsorship of
disabled service men and women when they return to the community. A
number of Military Coalition members are actively engaged in this worthy
activity and are helping disabled service men and women re-build their
lives. At the same time, TMC recognizes the limitations on voluntary
assistance efforts. TMC supports additional resources for the DoD, VA,
and DoJ to meet the unique needs of disabled servicemembers after their
separation from military service including but not limited to employment
services, mental health counseling, spouse or other caregiver training
and employment support, and identification of community resources to
help families.
TAP / DTAP Checklists
TMC is pleased to note some progress in refining the checklists used by
the Armed Forces in pre-separation counseling for the Guard and Reserve
as well as active duty troops. Appendix VII of the GAO Report lists a
number of changes that are to be implemented this year.
Revised checklists need to be structured in such a way as to emphasize
new or changed benefits so that Guard and Reserve troops will be aware
of the need for follow-up at home station. Some observations on proposed
checklist changes in Appendix VII follow:
• Health and Life Insurance Section. The new TRICARE Reserve Select (TRS)
Benefit is not identified in this section. Instead, three qualifying
descriptions are provided with no reference to a specific military
health care benefit available after separation
• Finance Section. Omitted for the Guard and Reserve as not applicable.
Guard and Reserve servicemembers and spouses must be provided the
information and tools to overcome any indebtedness incurred on active
duty, apply for Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP), if
eligible, and protect their reemployment rights under the Uniformed
Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA), among a number
of financial planning needs.
• Education / Training. Noted as “same as active duty.” However, there
are unique situations that should be earmarked in the checklist. For
example, reservists who serve 90 or more days up to two years active
duty are eligible for enhanced Montgomery GI Bill Benefits (MGIB) under
Chapter 1607 of Title 10. Those who serve 24-months continuous active
duty have the choice of electing to participate in the active duty MGIB
or the new Chapter 1607 program (which has not yet been implemented).
• Small Business Loans for Reservists. Mobilized small business owners
are eligible for “disaster-type” small business loans from the Small
Business Administration to restore businesses hurt by a call-up.
• Servicemembers’ Civil Relief Act. The SCRA is cited as the Soldiers
and Sailors Relief Act, the old title of the recently amended law. The
SCRA should be identified in the Finance section of the Checklist as a
source of information and financial protection for both active and
reserve servicemembers.
TMC recommends that DoD / DVA / DoJ be required to report on measures
taken to improve TAP processes and procedures (including TAP checklists)
for the active and reserve forces. TMC also recommends expanding DTAP
checklists to include mental health counseling to ensure spouse /
caregiver and community support resources are identified and a process
is in place to ensure follow through in the community.
Balancing Employment Workshop and Veterans Benefits Components of TAP /
DTAP
A key difference between active duty and reserve servicemembers is that
reservists are returning from a limited duration call-up to a known
civilian setting and, most often, reemployment in an existing job.
Active duty TAP participants on the other hand usually re-enter the
civilian world after years of full-time military service and little or
no civilian workplace experience. Consequently, TAP programs should be
structured to accommodate these differences.
Employment Workshop Component. The GAO Report notes that the Employment
Workshop component of TAP is conducted over 2 or 2.5 days by certified
DoL facilitators (p. 8). The GAO further notes that attendance in the
employment workshops is greatest among servicemembers who are retiring
with 20 or more years' active duty service. This phase makes sense for
those who have been away from the civilian marketplace for a long time.
The majority of de-mobilizing reservists, however, are returning to
their former civilian jobs and may not need a two-day employment
workshop dedicated to converting military skills / experience to the
civilian world. TMC supports the ongoing employment workshop pilot
projects in three states for Guard and Reserve TAP participants. We
agree that these initiatives should be evaluated for use at home station
during the post-service transition period.
Veterans Benefits Component.
More than 50% of the Selected Reserve is comprised of veterans who have
prior service in an active component of the Armed Forces. These
citizen-soldiers potentially are eligible for all veterans’ benefits
administered by the VA. The remainder of the Guard and Reserve, however,
may be eligible for some but not all veterans’ benefits unless and until
they complete qualifying active duty service.
Military Coalition partners hear from members that de-mobilizing troops
often have incomplete or inaccurate information regarding eligibility or
entitlement to veterans benefits, including VA health care, following
their release from active duty.
TMC has strongly advocated for improving “seamless transition” processes
to ensure the smooth and effective transition of servicemembers from
active duty. We are acutely aware of the need to strengthen “outbound”
DoD transition services as well as “inbound” veterans’ services and
believe that the TAP / DTAP programs can and should support seamless
transition objectives.
In 2003, the President’s Task Force to Improve Health Care Delivery for
Our Nation’s Veterans (PTF) final report on DoD - VA collaboration
focused on the need to improve services and support for separating
servicemembers to ensure the receipt of timely, quality health care and
other benefits. At this time when hundreds of thousands of
servicemembers are deployed in combat operations, the stakes are even
higher – putting them at greater risk for long-term, service-connected
health and disability problems.
In a more recent report Vocational Rehabilitation; More VA and DoD
Collaboration Needed to Expedite Services for Seriously Injured
Servicemembers (January 2005), GAO recommends that VA and the DoD share
information to promote recovery and return to work for seriously injured
servicemembers; and to develop policy and procedures for regional
offices to maintain contact with the seriously injured servicemembers.
Without systematic data from DoD, the VA cannot reliably identify all
seriously injured servicemembers or know with certainty when they are
medically stabilized, when they are undergoing medical evaluation, or
when they are medically discharged from the military.
The fiscal year 2005 National Defense Authorization Act directed DoD to
do a better job of collecting base-line health status data through a
formal medical readiness tracking and health surveillance system.
Fielding a “one-stop” discharge physical, providing outreach and
referrals for VA Compensation and Pension examinations, and following up
on claims adjudication and ratings is not just more cost effective in
terms of capital and human resources; it is the right thing to do -- to
ensure that servicemembers receive the benefits they have earned and
deserve.
DoD and VA are to be commended for the development of the Benefits
Delivery at Discharge (BDD) program for active and reserve component
members. BDD activities need to be coordinated with the TAP / DTAP
programs to the greatest extent possible.
The Military Coalition recommends expansion of the veterans benefits
component of the TAP / DTAP program, and use of post-separation VA
benefits briefings in communities and reserve centers. TMC supports a
“Manhattan Project” to accelerate development of a bi-directional
electronic medical record (EMR), enhanced post-deployment health
assessments, implementation of an electronic DD214, family services, and
a one-stop separation physical. These initiatives can support more
effective delivery of TAP services.
CONCLUSION
The Military Coalition appreciates the leadership of the members of this
Subcommittee to address needed improvements to Transition Assistance and
Disabled Transition Assistance Programs for the men and women of the
Armed Forces and their families. The Coalition is eager to work with the
Subcommittee in pursuit of the goals outlined in our testimony. Thank
you very much for the opportunity to present the Coalition's views on
these important topics.
Biography of Robert F. Norton, COL, USA (Ret.)
Deputy Director, Government Relations, MOAA
Co-Chair, Veterans’ Committee, The Military Coalition
A native New Yorker, Bob Norton was born in Brooklyn and raised on Long
Island. Following graduation from college in 1966, he enlisted in the
U.S. Army as a private, completed officer candidate school, and was
commissioned a second lieutenant of infantry in August 1967. He served a
tour in South Vietnam (1968-1969) as a civil affairs platoon leader
supporting the 196th Infantry Brigade in I Corps. He transferred to the
U.S. Army Reserve in 1969 and pursued a teaching career at the secondary
school level. He joined the 356th Civil Affairs Brigade (USAR), Bronx,
NY and served in various staff positions from 1972-1978.
Colonel Norton volunteered for active duty in 1978 and was among the
first group of USAR officers to affiliate with the "active Guard and
Reserve" (AGR) program on full-time active duty. Assignments included
the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel, Army Staff;
advisor to the Asst. Secretary of the Army (Manpower & Reserve Affairs);
and personnel policy and plans officer for the Chief, Army Reserve.
Colonel Norton served two tours in the Office of the Secretary of
Defense (OSD). He was responsible for implementing the Reserve
Montgomery GI Bill as a staff officer in Reserve Affairs, OSD. From 1989
–1994, he was the senior military assistant to the Assistant Secretary
of Defense for Reserve Affairs, where he was responsible for advising
the Asst. Secretary and coordinating a staff of over 90 military and
civilian personnel. During this tour, Reserve Affairs oversaw the
call-up of more than 250,000 National Guard and Reserve component troops
for the Persian Gulf War. Colonel Norton completed his career as special
assistant to the Principal Deputy Asst. Secretary of Defense, Special
Operations / Low Intensity Conflict and retired in 1995.
In 1995, Colonel Norton joined Analytic Services, Inc. (ANSER),
Arlington, VA as a senior operational planner supporting various clients
including UN humanitarian organizations and the U.S. Air Force’s
counterproliferation office. He joined MOAA’s national headquarters as
Deputy Director of Government Relations in March 1997.
Colonel Norton holds a B.A. in philosophy from Niagara University (1966)
and a Master of Science (Education) from Canisius College, Buffalo
(1971). He is a graduate of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff
College, the U.S. Army War College, and Harvard University’s Senior
Officials in National Security course at the Kennedy School of
Government.
Colonel Norton’s military awards include the Legion of Merit, Defense
Superior Service Medal, Bronze Star, Vietnam Service Medal, Armed Forces
Reserve Medal, Army Staff Identification Badge and Office of the
Secretary of Defense Identification Badge.
Colonel Norton is married to the former Colleen Krebs. The Nortons have
two grown children and reside in Derwood, Maryland.
|