|
Statement of
Congressman John T. Salazar
Representing the Third Congressional District
Of Colorado
Before the Veterans’ Affairs Committee
United States House of Representatives
Washington, DC
July 18, 2006
Chairman Buyer, Acting Ranking Member Filner, I
thank you for the opportunity to come before the House Committee on
Veterans’ Affairs to testify with regard to certain provisions of
the Veterans Identity and Credit Protection Act of 2006. I wish
there was no need for this bill, but the simple fact is that on May
3 of this year, personal computer equipment containing the personal
information of some 26.5 million veterans and 2.2 million active
duty and reserve component service members and their spouses was
stolen from the home of a VA employee.
This theft, while alarming on its own merit, brought to light a deep
and more troubling tragedy regarding cyber security and
communications at the Department of Veterans’ Affairs. In the two
months since the theft of this computer equipment, this committee
has held five oversight hearings in which we heard from current and
former VA employees, private sector experts on IT security,
academics, and the Secretary himself. These hearings opened the
Committee’s eyes to numerous problems that have already been
discussed.
The purpose of my testimony is to discuss provisions of the bill
related to new notification requirements for the Secretary. I, like
many of my colleagues in this committee, was outraged when I learned
that there was a 19 day gap between the date of the theft and the
day Congress and the public was notified. In response to the theft
of this data and the revelation that such delays in notification
occurred, I introduced HR 5588. This comprehensive bill, much of
which is adopted in the bill before the Committee today, addresses
the notification structure and requirements within the Department
should another data breach occur.
There are several subtle differences between this bill and HR 5588
so I will address the similarities of the two bills.
Both HR 5588 and the Veterans Identity and Credit Protection Act of
2006 codify in federal statute the manner in which the Secretary of
Veterans’ Affairs is to notify both Congress and affected
individuals involved in a data breach. By outlining the manner,
content and timeframe under which the notification of a data breach
takes place, it is my hope we can prevent a repeat of the 19 day
delay we witnessed in May.
Under the provisions of both bills, this committee and our
counterparts in the Senate are to receive notice of any breach
“without unreasonable delay following the discovery of a data breach
and the implementation of any measures necessary to determine the
scope of the breach, prevent any further breach or unauthorized
disclosures, and reasonably restore the integrity of the data
system.” More importantly, however, HR 5588 proscribes the way in
which the Secretary is to notify affected individuals. Each
individual is whose information has been compromised shall be
notified in writing without unreasonable delay and that notification
will include the following:
• A description of the personal information that was acquired during
the breach;
• A telephone number the individual may use at no cost to make
inquiries about the breach;
• Toll free contact numbers for the major credit reporting agencies;
• Toll free telephone number and website address for the Federal
Trade Commission; and
• Information regarding the right of an individual to place a fraud
alert, obtain a security freeze, and receive credit monitoring where
applicable.
There are relatively few differences between HR 5588 and the
Veterans Identity and Credit Protection Act in this section of the
bill. Mr. Chairman, I hope to work with you in the next two days to
address some of these minor differences and come to agreement on any
amendments that may need to be made.
Mr. Chairman, I would like to conclude by thanking you and Acting
Ranking Member Filner for holding this hearing today as well as the
previous five oversight hearings. I feel this committee can work in
a bipartisan manner to pass a finely crafted, comprehensive piece of
legislation that I think will serve our veterans well. The bill
makes much needed changes to the VA culture of indifference which we
heard so much about during our oversight hearings. By ensuring that
VA officials have both resources and authority to implement IT
security, it is my hope we can prevent future breaches of data
especially those on the magnitude of the one we saw this year. In
addition to those changes, I am happy that this bill affords
veterans whose identities may be compromised the opportunity to seek
appropriate remedies to protect their identity including the use of
fraud alerts and credit freezes.
Mr. Chairman, I thank you for inviting me to testify before the
committee today. Your work and dedication to fixing the bureaucratic
inefficiencies and problems within VA as well as your commitment to
protecting veterans is very much appreciated.
|