|
July 18, 2006
Testimony of Congresswoman Darlene Hooley (OR-5)
Before the House Committee on Veterans Affairs
Legislative Hearing on Veterans Identity and Credit Protection
Legislation
Good morning and thank you, Chairman Buyer and
Ranking Member Filner for the opportunity to appear before the
Committee. As one of millions of former credit card fraud victims
and as a member of the House Financial Services Committee I have
long had a strong interest in protecting consumers from potential ID
theft threats and financial crimes.
Identity theft represents a fundamental threat to e-commerce, to our
overall economy and to our Homeland Security. No longer are we
facing just hobbyist hackers looking to create a nuisance.
Increasingly these attacks are driven by skilled criminals and ID
theft has become big business.
For the past six years, I’ve worked in the Financial Services
Committee to protect consumers from the threat of ID theft. We’ve
made significant progress in the recent past, including the signing
into law of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, or the
FACT Act, in 2003. That bill, which I was proud to co-author with
Congressman LaTourette, provided consumers with landmark new
protections, including the right to free annual credit reports and
the right to place a “red flag” fraud alert on their credit reports.
Last February, after data security breaches at data brokers Choice
Point and Lexis Nexis, I began working on legislation to prevent
future data breaches, to provide meaningful notification when
consumers are placed at risk of harm by a security breach, and to
provide consumers with additional protections when they are placed
at risk of ID theft.
The need for such legislation was made crystal clear by the massive
data security breach suffered by the VA in May. The details of that
breach, which have been highlighted many times before this
Committee, underscore the glaring weaknesses in data security
policies and procedures at not only the VA, but throughout
government agencies and the private sector.
Any data security bill passed by Congress must include a number of
key ingredients to be effective.
First, it must mandate data security safeguards and require all
businesses and government entities that handle sensitive personal
financial information to have robust data security policies and
procedures in place. Currently, many businesses and most government
agencies are not required to employ such protections, leaving
consumers at risk. Mandating protection of sensitive information is
the first step in protecting consumers.
Second, legislation must mandate that all businesses and government
entities immediately conduct an investigation upon learning that a
breach of security might have occurred. That investigation should
determine the information involved, whether or not the information
is useable, and determine the likelihood that the information has
been or will be misused.
Third, legislation should require that upon discovering a breach,
the business or government entity notify the Secret Service, their
functional regulator, each of the credit reporting agencies, and any
third party who must take steps to protect consumers from resulting
fraud or identity theft.
Fourth, legislation should include system restoration requirements
that require any business or government entity to repair any breach
and restore the security and confidentiality of the sensitive
financial personal information and to make improvements to its data
security policies and procedures.
Finally, legislation should require a meaningful consumer notice
anytime a consumer is at risk of account fraud or identity theft.
That notice should contain vital information to aid the consumer in
protecting themselves from any harm that might result. In addition
that notice should provide consumers who are put at risk of ID theft
with opportunity to sign up for free of charge credit monitoring
services.
Legislation I’ve coauthored, H.R. 3997, the Financial Data
Protection Act, would accomplish exactly that.
However, the breach suffered by the VA, highlighted a few
shortcomings of that legislation as it was passed out of the
Financial Services Committee. In order to address those
shortcomings, I introduced legislation shortly after the massive VA
breach that would supplement H.R. 3997.
In the event of a data breach, H.R. 5487, the Veterans' ID Theft
Protection Act of 2006, would:
-
Authorize funding as necessary to the Secretary
of Veterans Affairs to provide credit monitoring as required;
and
-
Make certain the VA has all necessary
negotiating powers to secure the best possible price for the
credit monitoring services.
In conclusion, Chairman Buyer and Ranking Member
Filner, I would simply state that now is the time to act. The need
for federal action on data security is clear and we should not wait
for the next catastrophic breach to prod us to action.
Again, I thank you for the opportunity to testify before the
Committee today and look forward to working with each of it’s
members in passing common-sense data security legislation.
|