Terence M. Keane, Ph.D.
President
Association of VA Psychologist Leaders
Thank you Mr. Chairman and members of the
Committee.
My name is Terence M. Keane, Ph.D. and I am a clinical psychologist from
Boston and today I am representing the Association for VA Psychologist
Leaders serving as this year’s President. Our organization is more than
twenty-seven years old and its mission is to improve and enhance mental
health services for military veterans through the delivery of
outstanding clinical services, the conduct of relevant behavioral health
research, and the training of the next generation of psychologists.
In my career I’ve served as the Chief of Psychology at three different
VA’s, first at the Sonny Montgomery VA Medical Center in Jackson,
Mississippi; next at the Boston VA Medical Center, and most recently at
the consolidated VA Boston Healthcare System. Currently, I am the
Associate Chief of Staff for Research and Development at the VA Boston
and Professor of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Behavioral Neuroscience at
Boston University. However, to be clear, my comments today are as the
President of the Psychology Leadership group.
Our organization is concerned, as is the Nation, about American troops’
exposure to high levels of combat stress and its impact on individuals,
their families, and their communities. Thus, our comments are relevant
to the active military workforce, veterans, as well as those serving in
the Reserves and the National Guard. Each group presents a special
challenge for delivering optimal mental health services. Stigma, fear of
alienation, and access influence who does and who doesn’t seek mental
health services in these groups. All groups will one day consider
getting healthcare in VA.
As mental health professionals we are committed to providing the best
possible services to returning troops. As well, we are committed to
employing the most contemporary means of providing these services with
the goals of fostering positive adjustment and minimizing long term,
chronic mental health problems. The President’s New Freedom Commission
and the VA’s Action Agenda contain important new ways to manage the
large number of veterans with mental health and behavioral health
problems. These initiatives creatively driven by VA mental health
experts need to be fully resourced, implemented, evaluated, and
monitored.
Today, VA may well be the finest mental health system in the United
States, providing an array of services for treating trauma, substance
abuse, and other serious combat related mental health problems. Mental
health professionals provide services to veterans and their families in
Vet Centers, Primary Care Clinics, Specialized PTSD Clinics, Substance
Abuse Programs, Homeless Programs, and in general mental health clinics.
As VA has changed in the past ten years so have the models of mental
health care delivery. To keep pace, the mental health workforce in VA is
in need of a major educational initiative so that our skills in
prevention and treatment can be provided to the growing numbers of new
veterans coming to VA for mental health care. Models of individual
psychotherapy need to be used judiciously while supplemented by the use
of the modern methods of tele-mental health, integrated primary care and
mental health care, the use of self help methods, the internet and web
based interventions, and peer assisted support.
For the returning troops all efforts should be towards the promotion of
recovery and the fostering of independence. But implementation of these
new interventions requires a retooling of the workforce with significant
attention to the evidence bases derived from VA specialized programs,
private sector services, and from other healthcare systems worldwide.
Our organization is committed to working with VA in such an educational
initiative. Such a broad based educational effort will require modest
resources to establish and maintain.
In addition, our organization supports greater integration and
collaboration with the Department of Defense’s healthcare system.
Combined initiatives in health care, such as the use of a common,
integrated medical record, are critical to achieving our mission of
providing the best possible healthcare to military veterans.
Initiatives that promote collaborative care, collaborative education,
and collaborative research between VA and DOD are critical to the
success of our mission. We support those initiatives that bring the
healthcare and the mental healthcare services of these two agencies into
greater alignment. While many examples of this collaboration exist, more
are needed in order to optimally provide mental health services for
military veterans and their families. VA and DOD healthcare services can
benefit from additional collaborations centered around the people to be
served, whether these services are to be provided now or five years from
now.
We are aware of the limitations that exist for provision of mental
health services within VA to the Guard, Reservists, and veteran’s
families. We support the changes in eligibility that have been already
made and support increased inclusion of mental health services for
families that are affected by activation, deployment, injury, or death.
Although most cases of PTSD develop shortly after combat service, it is
indeed the case that, for some, mental health needs can emerge years
after their military service. Two months ago I spoke on the phone with a
veteran who happened to be a psychologist in his eighties who was part
of the American forces that took beachheads in Italy during World War
II. He described his experiences and wondered out loud to me if he
needed my help; his wife urged him to call VA as she thought he was
becoming increasingly preoccupied with his distressing war experiences.
Reports of a gap of decades between war and the appearance of war
related distress are all too common.
The jewels in VA mental health services exist in the specialized
programs that it possesses. Specialized services generated the
outstanding reputation VA has for its work in war related PTSD,
Substance Abuse, Geriatric Mental Health, and in the care of those with
psychotic conditions. Preserving these specialized services is central
to the excellence of VA noted in the New England Journal of Medicine and
the Lancet in 2004. Buttressing these specialized programs are VA’s
mental health centers of excellence. The Mental Illness Research
Education and Clinical Centers (i.e., MIRECC’s), the National Center for
PTSD, the Substance Abuse Centers of Excellence, and the Geriatric
Research Education and Clinical Centers (GRECC’s) all enhance the luster
of the VA system of mental health care. We urge continued strong support
for these leading lights in VA.
In the mid 1980’s VA conducted the National Vietnam Veterans
Readjustment Study. This study was remarkable in two respects. First, it
was the first time that any country had ever attempted to systematically
study the psychological and social impact of participation in a war;
second, it was the first mental health study employing a nationally
representative sample of Vietnam veterans. Today we have the opportunity
to understand the long term psychological and physical impact of
participation in war as Vietnam veterans are reaching their late
fifties. Our organization supports the completion of the follow-up study
of Vietnam veterans as it will provide us an outstanding opportunity to
plan for the future needs of this, the largest group of veterans at this
time. As well, this study will further help us in preparing for the
needs of the newest group of veterans from OEF-OIF.
Leadership in research on veterans’ mental health problems is one of the
major contributions of all VA. To maintain this resource there is a
distinct need to train younger investigators as the research work force
is graying; additional fellowships are needed in order to insure that
there is a new generation of researchers in mental health trained to
study veterans’ health problems. Once their training is complete, there
is a need for research funding that will support them early in their
careers. Our group supports the gradual increase in the proportion of
the research budget allocated to mental health and behavioral health
problems. If the initiative to gradually increase the mental health
research budget to approximately 20% of the total Research budget is
successful, it will insure that the country has a younger generation of
researchers dedicated to studying veterans’ mental health problems.
In April, Psychology leadership convened its annual meeting in Dallas,
Texas. Our Keynote Speakers were the Honorable Gordon H. Mansfield,
Deputy Secretary of VA and the Honorable Jonathan Perlin, Undersecretary
of Health. Each exhorted members of our group to assume even greater
leadership roles in promoting the recovery and rehabilitation of
returning injured veterans. Mr. Mansfield requested from our group a
list of recommendations for him to consider in improving services for
the newest veteran cohort using our healthcare system. A group of
dedicated members from AVAPL, the APA, and APA’s VA Section of Public
Service Psychologists spent countless hours identifying and articulating
these recommendations. They were recently forwarded to Mr. Mansfield for
his review. I am including herein a number of the most immediately
relevant recommendations from this effort:
I. Contributions to Returning OEF/OIF Veterans and Their Families
VA mental health professionals are prepared to foster a seamless
transition between DOD and DVA by providing treatment for those OEF and
OIF troops previously identified by DOD providers. There is a need for
specialists in the care of male and female combatants and the disorders
that they preferentially display.
We also recognize that the psychological wounds of OEF/OIF veterans will
also affect their loved ones. Family members are critical partners in
promoting the healing and recovery process of the veteran.
OEF/OIF veterans are more likely to seek medical services than services
identified as "mental health" as they attempt to return to normal lives.
Mental health professionals on site in primary care clinics, working
either as direct care providers or as immediate consultants to the
primary care provider, can facilitate the identification of the symptoms
of traumatic stress and other psychological disorders, or can provide
timely, patient-centered behavioral interventions when appropriate.
Recommendation 1: We support the establishment of at least one Post
Traumatic Stress Disorder Clinical Teams (PCTs) in every medical center
and endorse a staffing profile that includes the expertise to provide a
range of psychological services, including special services for women
veterans as well as services to spouses and families.
II. The Treatment of Veterans with Physical Injuries
Members of the Military are sustaining multiple severe injuries as a
result of suicide bombers, rockets, and improvised explosive devices.
Accordingly, many veterans will be treated for polytraumatic injuries
that result in physical, cognitive, psychological, and/or functional
impairments. These conditions frequently occur in combination with other
disabling conditions such as amputation, auditory and visual
impairments, spinal cord injury (SCI), post-traumatic stress disorder
(PTSD), and other mental health conditions.
Through specialized training, Behavioral Health professionals bring
expertise in rehabilitation, the neurosciences, and the addictions and
can make unique contributions to the care of veterans with these
conditions.
Recommendation 2: We recommend that mental health professionals be
present as full time members of treatment teams in rehabilitation
medicine programs across the country in order to provide the highest
standard of care possible. Providing behavioral health services through
a model of integrated care with other health care specialists offers the
best opportunity for early detection of mental health problems, for
promoting optimal recovery, and facilitating adherence to medical and
rehabilitative regimens.
Recommendation 3: To identify and to disseminate the most effective
treatment strategies for promoting full recovery from polytrauma
injuries, Interprofessional Research Fellowships should be established
through Office of Academic Affiliations in which psychologists,
physicians, and other rehabilitative health care specialists will work
collaboratively and from transdisciplinary perspectives to identify best
practices of care.
III. Advancing the Recovery and Rehabilitation Model of Treatment
The VA’s Action Agenda for the President’s New Freedom Commission on
Mental Health promotes a treatment model based on recovery and
rehabilitation for veterans diagnosed with serious mental illnesses.
Psychologists and Psychiatrists are, and historically have been, the
team leaders in VA Mental Health recovery and rehabilitation programs.
We endorse this core value model of recovery and are committed to
achieving the goal of this model: "Recovery is....to live a fulfilling
and productive life despite a disability" (President’s New Freedom
Commission Report).
Recommendation 4: We recommend that responsibility for a Recovery Model
and Rehabilitation Model, and its implementation across the country, be
given high priority within VHA and by the MHSHG. Planned resources
should be allocated to this objective and a monitoring program
established to insure that these resources are utilized to meet these
goals.
IV. Adopt Best Practice Guidelines for PTSD Compensation and Pension
Examinations
Psychologists and Psychiatrists collaboratively developed the Best
Practice Manual for Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Compensation
and Pension Examinations. These guidelines were designed to provide
clinicians with the optimal means for arriving at the most accurate
information for the Adjudicator examiners. They were developed in a
collaborative effort between Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) and
the National Center for PTSD (VHA). As the number of veterans seeking
compensation for war-related injuries, including PTSD, continues to
grow, it is essential that this entry point into the VA’s health care
system provide accurate information upon which future treatment needs
and compensation can be based.
Recommendation 5: We recommend that the Best Practice Guidelines for
PTSD Examinations be presented to the National Leadership Board (NLB) as
potentially one of the system’s most cost beneficial initiatives. The
methods outlined therein should reduce the backlog and improve the
confidence of the Adjudicators in their decisions based on available
data. The NLB should take necessary steps to assure that these
Guidelines are adopted on a nationwide basis.
V. Promote the Further Expansion of Telehealth into Behavioral and
Mental Health Field
We recognize that a significant number of veterans seeking behavioral
and mental health services live in rural areas and lack either the time
and/or resources to travel to VA stations. We also recognize the growing
demand for mental health services. Research has documented the benefits
to veterans of receiving treatment via a telehealth system. Web-based
interventions now exist for PTSD, depression, psychoses, and other
behavioral and mental health needs. Psychologists support the use of
telehealth in providing a variety of clinical health services and
recognize this is a practice that is a part of the Under Secretary’s
Mission and Planning Strategies vision for promoting clinical
effectiveness. Telehealth will foster a culture that encourages
innovation while providing enhanced access to mental health care.
Recommendation 6: We recommend that additional resources be directed
toward the expansion and implementation of telehealth services for
treating behavioral health problems. To achieve this goal, resources are
needed for an infrastructure to support practice, as well as education
and training for behavioral health providers, and for research to
evaluate the impact of these services.
VII. Revising the Current Disability Compensation System.
Historically, one of the major concerns of VA mental health
professionals has been that the current disability and compensation
system potentially rewards “staying ill”. Fear of losing disability
payments can be a disincentive for veterans to engage in recovery based
activities. We would welcome the opportunity to participate in a review
of current compensation practices with an eye towards the development of
policies that would support veterans as they transition back to health,
but would permit those in recovery to have a safety net when and if they
experience a deterioration of their condition
Recommendation 7: We recommend that representatives of Mental Health be
appointed to the new Veteran’s Disability Benefits Commission or an
internal implementation group to help address the strengths and
limitations of the current disability compensation system.
Thank you for this opportunity to speak on behalf of my organization and
we urge the committee to work in collaborative ways with VA, AVAPL, and
other professional groups to address the needs of current and future
military veterans and their families.
|