STATEMENT BY
COLONEL CHARLES W. HOGE, M.D., UNITED STATES ARMY
CHIEF OF PSYCHIATRY AND BEHAVIOR SERVICES
WALTER REED ARMY INSTITUTE OF RESEARCH
27 JULY 2005Mr.
Chairman and Members of the committee, thank you for the opportunity to
discuss the Army’s research into mental health issues associated with
deployments in the Global War on Terrorism. I am Colonel Charles W. Hoge,
M.D, Chief of Psychiatry and Behavior Services at the Walter Reed Army
Institute of Research. The Army and the Department of Defense (DoD) have
taken a distinctly pro-active approach to understanding and mitigating
the mental health concerns associated with the deployments to Iraq and
Afghanistan. Your interest in this matter, along the previous support of
Congress into our efforts, has greatly enhanced the body of scientific
information available regarding combat stress, post traumatic stress
disorder (PTSD), and other mental health issues. The Army is committed
to continuing to expand our knowledge of the symptoms of
deployment-related stress disorders and to identifying and treating
Soldiers and families manifesting these symptoms as early and
effectively as possible.
Mental health symptoms are common and expected reactions to combat, and
the Army and DoD have made it a priority to learn as much as possible
and adjust programs as the war is ongoing to meet the needs of our
service members. Research following other military conflicts has
demonstrated that deployment stressors and combat exposure confer
considerable risk of mental health problems to include PTSD, major
depression, substance abuse, social and occupational impairment, and
increased health care utilization. However, virtually all studies that
have assessed the mental health effects of combat from prior wars,
including the first Gulf War were conducted years after Soldiers
returned from the combat zone. A key methodological problem with these
studies is the long recall periods following combat exposure.
Many gaps exist in our understanding of the full psychosocial impact of
combat. The recent U.S. military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan have
involved the first sustained ground combat since the Vietnam war, as
well as hazardous security duties. Previous studies have not assessed
the broad range of mental health outcomes proximal to the time of
deployment. Of particular importance is the limited amount of research
prior to the current conflict in Afghanistan and Iraq to guide policy
regarding how best to promote access and deliver behavioral health
services to military service members. There have been very few studies
that have assessed the utilization of behavioral health services,
perceived need, and barriers to treatment among military personnel
shortly before or after combat deployment.
To address these concerns, a team at Walter Reed Army Institute of
Research, which I am honored to lead, initiated a large study in January
2003, with the support of senior Army medical and line leaders, to
assess the impact of current military operations in Operation Iraqi
Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) on the health and
well-being of Soldiers and family members. This study is ongoing and is
being funded under the Department of the Army Intramural Operational
Medicine Research Program. The study involves anonymous surveys
administered with informed consent under an approved research protocol.
The study has focused on combat operational units, and over 20,000
surveys have been collected to date. Soldiers from multiple brigade
combat teams, both Active Component and National Guard, as well as
members of Marine Expeditionary Forces deploying to OIF and OEF have
been surveyed before deployment, and / or after returning from
deployment. Post-deployment assessments have been conducted at 3-4
months, 6 months, and 12 months after returning from deployment. We have
also conducted similar surveys during deployment in OIF-1 and OIF-2 as
part of the Mental Health Advisory Team reports. The surveys include
questions about deployment stressors, combat experiences, and unit
climate variables such as cohesion and morale. Depression, anxiety, and
PTSD are measured using validated self-administered checklists, such as
the PTSD checklist developed by the National Center for PTSD. Other
outcomes include alcohol use, aggression, and family functioning.
Our study has confirmed that PTSD symptoms are much more commonly
reported after deployment than before deployment, particularly among
Soldiers who have returned from combat duty in Iraq. Results of surveys
collected among units 3-4 months post-deployment from Iraq were
published in the New England Journal of Medicine in July 2004.
Subsequent data collections out to 12 months post-deployment show modest
increases in the percent of Soldiers reporting PTSD over the published
figures, but have not yet been published. Overall, 15-17% of service
members who were surveyed 3-12 months post-deployment met the screening
criteria for PTSD using a widely accepted definition that requires
endorsement of multiple symptoms at a moderate or severe range
(resulting in a total score of at least 50 on a symptom scale that
ranges from 17-85). Nineteen to 21% of Soldiers surveyed met criteria
for PTSD, depression, or anxiety. Overall, results have been highly
consistent among the various units studied after deployment to OIF,
although some unit-level differences have been observed, largely related
to the frequency and intensity of combat experiences. We do not have
definitive data regarding the impact of longer deployments or repeated
deployments, but in general higher rates of PTSD have been observed
among units deployed for 12 months or more compared with units deployed
for shorter time periods. The prevalence rates of PTSD are much lower
following deployment to Afghanistan (6%) than deployment to Iraq. This
is directly related to the lower level of combat intensity in
Afghanistan. In parallel with our survey-based data there has been a
substantial increase in military mental health care utilization among
OIF veterans.
Alcohol misuse often is associated with PTSD, and we have also observed
increases in reported alcohol misuse among Soldiers after returning from
deployment to Iraq compared with Soldiers before deployment. Other
outcomes that we are looking at include aggression and family
functioning, and preliminary data indicates that there are likely
deployment related effects in these areas, similar to what previous
studies have shown. The strain of repeated deployments on Soldier and
family well-being is evident in some units anecdotally.
One of the most important findings of our research is what we’ve learned
about barriers to care in the military, particularly stigma. Our study
showed that Soldiers and Marines are not very likely to seek
professional help if they have a mental health problem, and that they
are concerned that they may somehow be treated differently if they do.
Stigma includes factors such as being concerned that one will be viewed
or treated differently by peers or leaders if they are known to be
receiving mental health treatment. Other barriers to care include not
being able to get time off work or not having adequate transportation to
get to the location where care is available. Stigma and barriers to
mental health care are well-known problems in civilian treatment
settings, especially among males, who are not as likely to seek help for
a problem than females. Our data has helped us to focus on approaches to
facilitate access to care for our OIF and OEF veterans.
Given the importance of PTSD and other mental health concerns among
military service members deploying to OIF and OEF, as well as what we
have learned about stigma and barriers to care, we have begun research
projects focused on improving early identification and intervention,
facilitating access to care, and evaluating programs that are being
implemented by the Army and DoD, such as the post-deployment health
assessments. Our ongoing research program includes efforts to identify
factors that predict high rates of mental health problems, identify gaps
in service delivery, reduce stigma and barriers to care, and other
efforts to help guide policy and to assure optimal delivery of services.
We are evaluating assessment tools to provide effective methods of
conducting psychological health screening in deployed troops which are
cornerstones of facilitating access and early intervention, and improve
methods for units to evaluate the behavioral health status at the unit
level anonymously. Our research has shown that Soldiers are much more
likely to report mental health problems 3-4 months after return from
deployment than immediately on return from deployment, and as a result
DoD has expanded the post-deployment health assessment program. We are
also evaluating interventions such as psychological debriefing, and
developing training modules for Soldiers, leaders, and health care
providers. One of the most important aspects of our work is to assure
that we provide the best services within the medical model of care,
while conveying the message to our service members that many of the
reactions that they experience after combat are common and expected.
Helping to normalize these reactions is a key to stigma reduction and
early intervention.
Considerations for improving access to care include co-locating mental
health services in primary care clinics and improving awareness among
primary care professionals of depression and PTSD evaluation and
treatment. DoD and the Department of Veterans Affairs have collaborated
on developing clinical practice guidelines for these conditions and have
recommended routine screening in primary care. Standardized training of
leaders and Soldiers about PTSD and other mental health effects of
combat pre- and post-deployment are being developed, and further
research and program evaluation is needed to ensure implementation of
evidence-based practices. One of the most important things is to ensure
there are adequate resources to support continued mental health and
operational stress control services in the combat environment as well as
to ensure that service members who are identified through
post-deployment screening or who refer themselves after coming home (as
well as their family members) receive timely evaluation and treatment.
|