STATEMENT OF
STEVE ROBERTSON, DIRECTOR
NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION
THE AMERICAN LEGION
BEFORE THE
COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
ON THE FISCAL YEAR 2007 BUDGETARY RECOMMENDATIONS
OF THE AMERICAN LEGION
FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
FEBRUARY 8, 2006
Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee:
This written statement was due to the Committee on February 6, 2006, the
same day that the President’s budget request was released. The American
Legion did not have time to do a thorough analysis and provide
appropriate comments; therefore, we request permission to “revise and
extend remarks” for the record of this written statement.
On September 20, 2005, The American Legion’s newly elected National
Commander, Tom Bock presented the views of its 2.7 million members on
issues under the jurisdiction of your Committee. At the conclusion of
The American Legion’s 87th National Convention in Honolulu, Hawaii, over
3,100 delegates adopted 42 organizational resolutions with 36 having
legislative intent. These organizational mandates will add to the
legislative portfolio of The American Legion for the remainder of the
109th Congress.
As Legionnaires gathered at the National Convention to once again
determine the path of the nation’s largest veterans’ service
organization, it was with respect for those who have worn the uniform
before us, friendship for those with whom we served and admiration for
those who currently defend the freedoms of this great nation. Each
generation of America’s veterans has earned the right to quality health
care and transitional programs available through the Department of
Veterans Affairs (VA). The American Legion will continue to work with
this Committee and your colleagues in the Senate to ensure that VA is
indeed capable of providing “…care for him who shall have borne the
battle and for his widow and his orphan.”
The American Legion applauds the President’s recent letter to the
Speaker addressing the $1.225 billion earmarked as “emergency spending”
in the FY 2006 VA medical care budget. Clearly, The American Legion
supports this decision and appreciates this Committee’s efforts in
securing additional funding for both the FY 2005 and FY 2006 budgets.
These additional dollars replaced funds swapped between other accounts
to meet the medical care shortfall. The American Legion believes VA will
now see an end to “hiring freezes,” no delays in non-recurring
maintenance, reductions in medical equipment backlogs, and other
“management efficiencies.”
With that in mind and on behalf of The American Legion, I reiterate the
following budgetary recommendations for VA‘s discretionary funding in FY
2007:
BUDGET PROPOSALS FOR SELECTED DISCRETIONARY PROGRAMS FOR
VA IN FISCAL YEAR 2007
VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR
($ MILLIONS) 2006 2007
VA REQ TAL APPR TAL
MEDICAL CARE INCLUDING:
MEDICAL SERVICES 21972 23279 21322 24768
MEDICAL ADMINISTRATION 4518 4756 2858 5057
MEDICAL FACILITIES 3298 3465 3298 3675
EMERGENCY APPROPRIATIONS 1225
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 1214
MEDICAL CARE TOTAL 29788 31500 29917 33500
MEDICAL CARE COLLECTIONS* 2100
MEDICAL AND PROSTHETICS RESEARCH 438 447 412 469
GENERAL OPERATING EXPENSES 1200 1800 1411 1900
MAJOR CONSTRUCTION/CARES 353 327 607 343
CARES DEDICATED FUNDING 1000 1000
MINOR CONSTRUCTION/CARES 160 261 199 274
STATE HOMES CONSTRUCTION 32 124 85 250
NATIONAL CEMETERY ADMINISTRATION
FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR
($ MILLIONS) 2006 2007
VA REQ TAL APPR TAL
NCA OPERATIONS 156 274 156 174
STATE VETERANS CEMETERIES 32 42 32 44
MANDATORY FUNDING FOR VETERANS HEALTH CARE
A new generation of young Americans is once again deployed around the
world, answering the nation’s call to arms. Like so many brave men and
women who honorably served before them, these new veterans are fighting
for the freedom, liberty and security of us all. Also like those who
fought before them, today’s veterans deserve the due respect of a
grateful nation when they return home.
Unfortunately, without urgent changes in health care funding, new
veterans will soon discover their battles are not over. They will be
forced to fight for the life of a health care system that was designed
specifically for their unique needs. Just as the veterans of the 20th
century did, they will be forced to fight for the care each one is
eligible to receive.
The American Legion continues to believe that the solution to the
Veterans Health Administration (VHA) recurring fiscal difficulties will
only be achieved when its funding becomes a mandatory spending item.
Funding for VA health care currently falls under discretionary spending
within the Federal budget. VA’s health care budget competes with other
agencies and programs for Federal dollars each year. The funding
requirements of health care for service-disabled veterans are not
guaranteed under discretionary spending. VA’s ability to treat veterans
with service-connected injuries is dependent upon discretionary funding
approval from Congress each year.
Under mandatory funding, VA health care would be funded by law for all
enrollees who meet the eligibility requirements, guaranteeing yearly
appropriations for the earned health care benefits of enrolled veterans.
The American Legion is pleased to support legislation pending in the
109th Congress that would establish a system of capitation-based funding
for VHA by combining the total enrolled veteran population with the
number of non-veterans who received services from VHA, then dividing
that number into 120 percent of the current VHA budget or to another
amount, depending on the bill. This baseline per-capita amount is then
adjusted for medical inflation each year and is multiplied by the
veteran and non-veteran population for the prior fiscal year to arrive
at a total budget for VHA for each succeeding fiscal year. This new
funding system would provide the bulk of VHA’s Medical Services funding,
except funding of the State Extended Care Facilities Construction Grant
Program, which would be separately authorized, and third-party
reimbursements. Annual funding would be without fiscal year limitation,
meaning that any savings VHA realized in a fiscal year would be retained
rather than returned to the Treasury, providing VHA with incentives to
develop efficiencies and creating a pool of funds for enhanced services,
needed capital improvements, expanded research and development and other
purposes.
The Veterans Health Administration is now struggling to maintain its
global preeminence in 21st century health care with funding methods that
were developed in the 19th century. No other modern health care
organization could be expected to survive under such a system. The
American Legion believes that health care rationing for veterans must
end. It is time to guarantee health care funding for all veterans.
MEDICAL CARE COLLECTIONS FUND
The Balanced Budget Act of 1997, Public Law 105-33, established the VA
Medical Care Collections Fund (MCCF), requiring that amounts collected
or recovered from third party payers after June 30, 1997 be deposited
into this fund. The MCCF is a depository for collections from
third-party insurance, outpatient prescription co-payments and other
medical charges and user fees. The funds collected may only be used for
providing VA medical care and services and for VA expenses for
identification, billing, auditing and collection of amounts owed the
government. In fiscal year 2004, VHA collected $1.7 billion, a
significant increase over the $540 million collected in fiscal year
2001. The fiscal year 2005 budget estimate projects $1.9 billion in MCCF
collections and the VA fiscal year 2006 budget request called for $2.1
billion to supplement appropriations, a 10.8 percent increase over
fiscal year 2005. VA’s ability to capture these funds is critical to its
ability to provide quality and timely care to veterans.
Government Accountability Office (GAO) reports have described continuing
problems in VHA’s ability to capture insurance data in a timely and
correct manner and raised concerns about VHA’s ability to maximize its
third-party collections. At three medical centers visited, GAO found
inability to verify insurance, accepting partial payment as full,
inconsistent compliance with collections follow-up, insufficient
documentation by VA physicians, insufficient automation and a shortage
of qualified billing coders were key deficiencies contributing to the
shortfalls. VA should implement all available remedies to maximize its
collections of accounts receivable.
Technically, the MCCF is not considered a Treasury offset because the
funds collected do not actually go back to the MCCF treasury account,
but remain within VHA and are used as operating funds. When developing
the agency’s budget proposal, the total appropriation request is reduced
by the estimate for MCCF for the fiscal year in question. We fail to see
the difference in the net effect on VISNs and VAMCs. Offsetting
estimated MCCF funds largely defeats the purpose of realigning VHA’s
financial model to more closely approximate the private sector. The
American Legion opposes offsetting annual VA discretionary funding by
the MCCF recovery.
MEDICARE
As do all other citizens, veterans pay into the Medicare system without
choice throughout their working lives. A portion of each earned dollar
is allocated to the Medicare Trust Fund and although veterans must pay
into the Medicare system they cannot use their Medicare benefits to
reimburse allowable treatment and services received in VA health care
facilities. VA, unlike the Department of Defense or Indian Health
Services, cannot bill Medicare for the treatment of allowable Medicare
eligible veterans’ nonservice-connected medical conditions. This
prohibition constitutes a multibillion dollar annual subsidy to the
Medicare Trust Fund. The American Legion does not agree with this policy
and supports Medicare reimbursement for VHA for the allowable treatment
of nonservice-connected medical conditions of enrolled Medicare-eligible
veterans.
CAPITAL ASSET REALIGNMENT FOR ENHANCED SERVICES
VA’s Capital Asset Realignment for Enhanced Service (CARES) has entered
into the final steps of the process - implementation and integration.
The CARES decision released in May 2004 directed VHA to conduct 18
feasibility studies at those health care delivery sites where final
decisions could not be made due to inaccurate and incomplete
information. The 18 studies fall into two broad categories: 1) studies
of sites where no specific decisions have been made to date for the
delivery of health care, i.e., do we decide to merge these facilities or
not; and 2) studies of sites where the Secretary’s decision defines the
health care solution to be implemented, i.e., how to best use or re-use
the campus as a capital planning decision. VHA contracted
Pricewaterhouse Cooper (PwC) to identify and determine the best approach
to provide veterans with health care services equal to or better than is
currently provided and evaluate in terms of access, quality, and cost
effectiveness, while maximizing any potential re-use of all or portions
of the current real property inventory. The entire process was scheduled
for 13 months with a completion date of no later than February 2006.
One of the components of the CARES Phase II process was stakeholder
input. In order to ensure the concept was not lost during the ongoing
studies, Local Advisory Panels (LAPs) were set up at each of the study
sites. The membership of the LAPs consist of key stakeholders including
community leaders, veterans groups, VA affiliated medical schools and VA
representation. The LAPs are to hold four public meetings to gather and
share stakeholder input during the yearlong studies. Ideally, PwC and
LAPs will work together to develop options that PwC will eventually
present to the Secretary. The American Legion was concerned when the
first meetings had to be pushed back from March to the end of April.
This could only mean that the final decision was going to be delayed. VA
was already behind their established timeline. When the meetings were
finally held, The American Legion was present at every single one. We
will ensure our presence at all of LAPs throughout the process. The
American Legion intends to hold accountable those who are entrusted to
provide the best health care services to the most deserving population –
the nation’s veterans.
The implementation of the CARES decision promises to be long. VA has
estimated that it will require $1 billion per year for the next six
years, with continuing substantial infrastructure investments into the
future. The American Legion is opposed to CARES funding coming out of
the discretionary medical care account. The American Legion believes the
CARES implementation must occur in the context of a fully utilized VA
health care system. It must take into consideration VA’s role in
emergency preparedness, organizational capacity for services such as
long-term care and Homeland Security. Further, there must be continued
oversight of the integration of the CARES process into the strategic
planning process. Without that oversight, plans and promised services
may be overlooked.
MEDICAL CONSTRUCTION AND INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT
Major Construction
Over the past several years, The American Legion has testified on the
inadequacy of funding for VA’s major and minor construction programs.
This inadequacy has become even more apparent in light of the
congressionally imposed moratorium on construction funding during the
CARES process. The American Legion is both relieved and encouraged to
see that the first two years worth of VA designated high-priority
projects include critically needed seismic corrections to nine
vulnerable structures in California and Puerto Rico. The American Legion
has consistently expressed its concern about veterans being treated in
unsafe facilities. There are over 60 patient care and other related use
buildings in danger of collapse or heavy damage in the event of an
earthquake. The sorely needed seismic corrections, along with the
necessary ambulatory care and patient safety projects, will require a
significant increase in funding to address VHA’s current major
construction requirements. We believe these designated seismic projects,
other seismic corrections and life safety upgrades, should be dealt with
first on an emergency basis.
VA’s list of priority projects for fiscal years 2004 (18 projects) and
2005 (12 projects) will cost an estimated $1.85 billion and $635
million, respectively. Of this, $1 billion is from major construction
and CARES appropriations, including $400 million in transfer authority
from medical care accounts. The American Legion opposes the use of
medical care appropriations for construction and urges Congress to
separately and fully fund these projects.
The American Legion recommends $343 Million for Major Construction and a
separate $1 billion for the implementation of the CARES recommendations
in FY 2007.
Minor Construction
VA’s minor construction program has likewise suffered significant
neglect over the past several years. The requirement to maintain the
infrastructure of VA’s buildings is no small task. When combined with
the added cost of the CARES program recommendations and the request for
minor infrastructure upgrades in several research facilities, it is easy
to see that a major increase over the previous funding level is crucial.
We question the transfer of prior-year minor construction funds into
CARES. During our site visits to all VHA medical centers over the past
three years, we noted a recurrent theme in which facilities managers are
routinely forced to divert funds from other priorities to repair roofs,
replace boilers and upgrade utilities and life safety and other critical
systems. The American Legion believes that these funds should be used
for the purposes for which they were intended and that the “transfer
authority” does not include monies designated for patient care.
The American Legion recommends $274 million for Minor Construction in FY
2007.
THE AGING OF AMERICA’S VETERANS
A landmark July 1984 study, Caring for the Older Veteran, predicted that
a “wave” of elderly World War II and Korean Conflict veterans would
occur some 20 years ahead of the elderly in the general U.S. population
and had the potential to overwhelm the VA Long Term Care (LTC) system if
not properly planned for. The most recent available data from VA, 2000
Census-based VETPOP2001Adjusted, show there were 25.6 million veterans
in 2002. Of that number, 9.76 million, or 37 percent are aged 65 or
older. According to the 2003 National Survey of Veteran Enrollees’
Health and Reliance on VA enrolled in VA health care 14 percent of the
veteran population was under the age of 45, 39 percent were between the
ages of 45 and 64, and 47 percent of veterans were 65 years or older.
Compared to the 2001 Survey, in which the age distribution was 21
percent, 41 percent and 39 percent, respectively, it is clear that the
“demographic imperative” predicted by the 1984 study is now upon us.
The study cited an “imminent need to provide a coherent and
comprehensive approach to long-term care for veterans.” Twenty–one years
hence, the coherent and comprehensive approach called for has yet to
materialize. The American Legion supports a requirement to mandate that
VA publish a Long Term Care Strategic Plan.
The Veterans Millennium Health Care and Benefits Act of 1999 provided VA
authority to act on these projections. Based on an “aging in place”
continuum of care model, VA was mandated to begin providing a variety of
non-institutional services to aging veterans, including; home–based
primary care, contract home health care, adult day health care,
homemaker and home health aides, respite care, telehealth and geriatric
evaluation and management.
On March 29, 2002, GAO issued a report that stated that nearly two years
after The Millennium Act’s passage, VA had not implemented its response
to the requirements that all eligible veterans be offered adult day
health care, respite care and geriatric evaluation. At the time of GAO’s
inquiry, access to these services was “far from universal.” While VA
served about one-third of its 3rd Quarter 2001 LTC workload (23,205 out
of an Average Daily Census of 68,238) in non-institutional settings, VA
only spent 8 percent of its LTC budget on these services. Additionally,
VA had not even issued final regulations for non-institutional care, but
was implementing the services by issuing internal policy directives,
according to GAO. Of 140 VAMCs, only 100 or 71 percent were offering
adult day health care in non-institutional settings.
By May 22, 2003, over one year later, GAO testified before the House
Veterans’ Affairs Subcommittee on Health that things had not improved
and that veterans’ access to non-institutional LTC was still limited by
service gaps and facility restrictions. GAO’s assessment showed that for
four of the six services, the majority of facilities either did not
offer the service or did not provide access to all veterans living in
the geographic service area. GAO summed up the problem nicely when it
testified that “[f]aced with competing priorities and little guidance
from headquarters, field officials have chosen to use available
resources to address other priorities.”
In the area of nursing home care, VA is equally recalcitrant in
implementing the mandates of the Millennium Act. The Act required VA to
maintain its in-house Nursing Home Care Unit (NHCU) bed capacity at the
1998 level of 13,391. In 1999 there were 12,653 VA NHCU beds, 11,812 in
2000, 11,672 in 2001, 11,969 in 2002 and 12,339 beds in 2003. VHA
estimates it had 11,000 beds in 2004 and projects only 8,500 beds for
fiscal year 2005. VA claims that it cannot maintain both the mandated
bed capacity and implement all the non-institutional programs required
by the Millennium Act. Providing adequate inpatient LTC capacity is good
policy and good medicine. The American Legion opposes attempts to repeal
38 U.S.C. § 1710B(b).
The American Legion believes that VA should take its responsibility to
America’s aging veterans much more seriously and provide the quality of
care mandated by Congress. Congress should do its part and provide
adequate funding to VA to implement its mandates.
State Extended Care Facility Construction Grants Program
Since 1984, nearly all planning for VA inpatient nursing home care has
revolved around State Veterans Homes (SVHs) and contracts with public
and private nursing homes. The reason for this is obvious; for fiscal
year 2004 VA paid a per diem of $59.48 for each veteran it places in
SVHs, compared to the $354.00 VA said it cost in FY 2002 to maintain a
veteran for one day in its own NHCUs.
Under the provisions of title 38, U.S.C., VA is authorized to make
payments to states to assist in the construction and maintenance of SVHs.
Today, there are 109 SVHs in 47 states with over 23,000 beds providing
nursing home, hospital, and domiciliary care. Grants for Construction of
State Extended Care Facilities provide funding for 65 percent of the
total cost of building new veterans homes. Recognizing the growing
long-term health care needs of older veterans, it is essential that the
State Veterans Home Program be maintained as a viable and important
alternative health care provider to the VA system. The American Legion
opposes attempts to place moratoria on new SVH construction grants and
.find the $85 million appropriated in H.R. 2528 for fiscal year 2006
unacceptable. State authorizing legislation has been enacted and state
funds have been committed. The West Los Angeles State Veterans Home,
alone, is a $125 million project. Delaying this and other projects will
result in cost overruns from increasing building materials costs and may
lead states to cancel these much–needed facilities.
The American Legion supports increasing the amount of authorized per
diem payments to just 50 percent for nursing home and domiciliary care
provided to veterans in State Veterans Homes. The American Legion also
supports the provision of prescription drugs and over-the-counter
medications to State Homes Aid and Attendance patients, along with the
payment of authorized per diem to State Veterans Homes. Additionally, VA
should allow for full reimbursement of nursing home care to 70 percent
service-connected veterans or higher, if the veteran resides in a State
Veterans Home.
The American Legion recommends $250 Million for the State Extended Care
Facility Construction Grants Program in FY 2007.
MEDICAL SCHOOL AFFILIATIONS
VHA and its medical school affiliates have enjoyed a long-standing and
exemplary relationship for nearly 60 years that continues to thrive and
evolve to the present day. Currently, there are 126 accredited medical
schools in the United States. Of these, 107 have formal affiliation
agreements with VA Medical Centers (VAMCs). More than 30,000 medical
residents and 22,000 medical students receive a portion of their medical
training in VA facilities annually. VA estimates that 70 percent of its
physician workforce has university appointments. At some medical
schools, 95 percent of medical staff at affiliated VAMCs has dual
appointments.
VHA conducts the largest coordinated education and training program for
health care professions in the nation and medical school affiliations
allow VA to train new health professionals to meet the health care needs
of veterans and the nation. Medical school affiliations have been a
major factor in VA’s ability to recruit and retain high quality
physicians and to provide veterans access to the most advanced medical
technology and cutting edge research; VHA research has made countless
contributions to improve the quality of life for veterans and the
general population.
The American Legion affirms its strong commitment and support for the
mutually beneficial affiliations between VHA and the medical schools of
this nation.
MEDICAL AND PROSTHETICS RESEARCH
VA’s Medical and Prosthetic Research Service has a history of
productivity in advancing medical knowledge and improving health care
not only for veterans, but all Americans. VA research has led to the
creation of the cardiac pacemaker, nicotine patch, and the Computerized
Axial Tomography (CAT) scan, as well as other medical breakthroughs.
Most recently, VA research has shown that an experimental vaccine
against shingles prevented about 51 percent of cases of shingles, a
painful nerve and skin infection, and dramatically reduced its severity
and complications in vaccinated persons who got shingles. Over 3800 VA
physicians and scientists conduct more than 9,000 research projects each
year involving more than 150,000 research subjects.
The American Legion supports adequate funding for VA research
activities, including basic biomedical research as well as
bench-to-bedside projects. Congress and the Administration should
encourage acceleration in the development and initiation of needed
research on conditions that significantly affect veterans - such as
prostate cancer, addictive disorders, trauma and wound healing,
post-traumatic stress disorder, rehabilitation, and others jointly with
the Department of Defense (DoD), the National Institutes of Health (NIH),
other Federal agencies, and academic institutions.
The American Legion recommends $ 469 million for Medical and Prosthetics
Research in FY 2007.
HOMELESS VETERANS
VA has estimated that there are at least 250,000 homeless veterans in
America and approximately 500,000 veterans experience homelessness in a
given year. Most homeless veterans are single men; however, the number
of single women with children has drastically increased within the last
few years. Homeless female veterans tend to be younger, are more likely
to be married, and are less likely to be employed. They are also more
likely to suffer from serious psychiatric illness.
Approximately 40 percent of homeless veterans suffer from mental illness
and 80 percent have alcohol or other drug abuse problems. It cannot go
unnoticed that the increase in homeless veterans coincides with the
under-funding of VA health care, which resulted in the downsizing of
inpatient mental health capabilities in VA hospitals across the country.
Since 1996, VA has closed 64 percent of its psychiatric beds and 90
percent of its substance abuse beds. It is no surprise that many of
these displaced patients end up in jail, or on the streets. The American
Legion applauds VA’s recent plan to restore a good portion of this
capacity. The American Legion believes there should be a focus on the
prevention of homelessness, not just measures to respond to it.
Preventing it is the most important step to ending it.
The American Legion has a vision to assist in ending homelessness among
veterans, by ensuring services are available to respond to veterans and
their families in need before they experience homelessness. Towards that
objective, The American Legion in partnership with the National
Coalition for Homeless Veterans created a Homeless Veterans Task Force
in the fall of 2002. The mission of the Task Force is to develop and
implement solutions to end homelessness among veterans through
collaborating with government agencies, homeless providers and other
veteran service organizations. In the last two years, 16 homeless
veterans workshops were conducted during The American Legion National
Leadership Conferences, National Convention and Mid-Winter Conferences.
Currently, there are 51 Homeless Veterans Chairpersons within The
American Legion who act as liaison to federal, state and community
homeless agencies and monitor fundraising, volunteerism, advocacy and
homeless prevention activities within participating American Legion
Departments. The American Legion Homeless Veterans Outreach Award is
presented to the Department that made the greatest effort to end veteran
homelessness within their area. At this year’s National Convention, the
Department of Indiana was presented this award.
The current Administration has vowed to end the scourge of homelessness
within ten years. The clock is running on this commitment, yet words far
exceed deeds. While less than nine percent of the nation’s population
are veterans, 34 percent of the nation’s homeless are veterans and of
those 75 percent are wartime veterans.
Homelessness in America is a travesty. Veterans’ homelessness is a
national disgrace. Left unattended and forgotten, these men and women,
who once proudly wore the uniforms of this nation’s armed forces and
defended her shores, are now wandering streets in desperate need of
medical and psychiatric attention and financial support. While there
have been great strides in ending homelessness among America’s veterans,
there is much more that needs to be done. We must not forget them. The
American Legion supports funding that will lead to the goal of ending
homelessness in the next ten years.
Homeless Providers Grant and Per Diem Program Reauthorization
In 1992, VA was given authority to establish the Homeless Providers
Grant and per Diem Program under the Homeless Veterans Comprehensive
Services Programs Act of 1992, P.L. 102-590. The Grant and Per Diem
Program is offered annually (as funding permits) by the VA to fund
community agencies providing service to homeless veterans.
The American Legion strongly supports changing the grant and Per Diem
Program to be funded on a five-year period instead of annually. The
American Legion also supports a funding level increased to the $200
million level annually.
NATIONAL CEMETERY ADMINISTRATION
The National Cemetery Administration (NCA) is charged with meeting the
interment needs of the nation’s veterans and their eligible dependents.
NCA is striving to meet its accessibility goal of 90 percent of all
veterans living within 75 miles of open national or state veterans
cemeteries. There are approximately 14,200 acres within established
installations in NCA. Just over half are undeveloped and, with available
gravesites in developed acreage, have the potential to provide more than
3.6 million gravesites. More than 301,050 full-casket gravesites, 58,500
in-ground gravesites for cremated remains, and 37,900 columbarium niches
are available in already developed acreage in our 120 national
cemeteries.
National Cemetery Expansion
The NCA’s budget proposal totaled $459 million and 1,566 FTE for fiscal
year 2006. Of the total outlay projected for FY 2006, $170.6 million is
for burial benefits, $156 million is for National Cemetery operations
and maintenance. The FY 2006 outlay proposal earmarks $90.3 million for
major and minor construction. This reflects the cemetery construction
mandated by The Veterans Millennium Health Care and Benefits Act, P.L.
106-117, which required NCA to establish six new National Cemeteries.
The first, Fort Sill, opened in 2001 under the fast-track program, while
the remaining five – Atlanta, Detroit, South Florida, Pittsburgh and
Sacramento – are in various stages of development.
The American Legion supported P.L. 108-109, the National Cemetery
Expansion Act of 2003 authorizing VA to establish new national
cemeteries to serve veterans in the areas of: Bakersfield, Calif.;
Birmingham, Ala.; Jacksonville, Fla.; Sarasota County, Fla.;
southeastern Pennsylvania; and Columbia-Greenville, S.C. All six areas
have veteran populations exceeding 170,000, which is the threshold VA
has established for new national cemeteries.
Congress must provide sufficient major construction appropriations to
permit NCA to accomplish its stated goal of ensuring that burial in a
national or state cemetery is a realistic option by locating cemeteries
within 75 miles of 90 percent of eligible veterans.
National Shrine Commitment
Maintaining cemeteries as National Shrines is one of NCA’s top
priorities. This commitment involves raising, realigning and cleaning
headstones and markers to renovate gravesites. The work that has been
done so far has been outstanding; however, adequate funding is key to
maintaining this very important commitment. At the rate that Congress is
funding this work, it will take twenty-eight years to complete. The
American Legion supports NCA’s goal of completing the National Shrine
Commitment in five years. This Commitment includes the establishment of
standards of appearance for national cemeteries that are equal to the
standards of the finest cemeteries in the world. Operations, maintenance
and renovation funding must be increased to reflect the true
requirements of the NCA to fulfill this Commitment.
The American Legion recommends $174 million for the National Cemetery
Administration in FY 2007.
State Cemetery Construction Grants Program
The FY 2006 budget requested $32 million for State Veterans Cemetery
Grant Program. This is “no-year money” and so any monies not spent in
the previous fiscal year can be carried over into the next fiscal year.
This program is not intended to replace National Cemeteries, but to
complement them. Grants for state-owned and operated cemeteries can be
used to establish, expand and improve on existing cemeteries. Currently
there are 61 operating state cemeteries in 32 states. In FY 2004, NCA
supported State cemeteries provided more than 19,000 interments. NCA
currently has 43 active applications for grants to build new state
cemeteries and expand existing ones.
Since NCA concentrates its construction resources on large metropolitan
areas, it is unlikely that new national cemeteries will be constructed
in all states. Therefore, individual states are encouraged to pursue
applications for the State Cemetery Grants Program. Fiscal commitment
from the state is essential to keep the operation of the cemetery on
track. NCA estimates it takes about $300,000 a year to operate a state
cemetery.
The American Legion recommends $47 million for the State Cemetery Grants
Program in FY 2007.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Veterans’ Employment and Training Service
The American Legion’s position regarding VETS is that it should remain a
national program with Federal oversight and accountability. The mission
of VETS is to promote the economic security of America’s veterans. This
stated mission is executed by assisting veterans in finding meaningful
employment. The American Legion views the VETS program as one of the
best-kept secrets in the Federal government. It is comprised of many
dedicated individuals who struggle to maintain a quality program without
substantial increases in both funding and staffing.
Annually, DoD discharges approximately 250,000 service members. Recently
separated service personnel are likely to seek immediate employment or
continue their formal or vocational education. In order for the VETS
program to assist these veterans to achieve their goals, it needs to:
• Improve by expanding its outreach efforts with creative initiatives
designed to improve employment and training services for veterans.
• Provide employers with a labor pool of quality applicants with
marketable and transferable job skills.
• Provide information on identifying military occupations that require
licenses, certificates or other credentials at the local, state, or
national levels.
• Eliminate barriers to recently separated service personnel and assist
in the transition from military service to the civilian labor market.
• Strive to be a proactive agent between the business and veterans’
communities in order to provide greater employment opportunities for
veterans.
The American Legion believes staffing levels for Disabled Veterans’
Outreach Program (DVOP) specialists and Local Veterans’ Employment
Representatives (LVERs) should match the needs of the veteran community
in each state and not be based solely on the fiscal needs of the state
government. Such services will continue to be crucial as today’s active
duty service members, especially those returning from combat in Iraq and
Afghanistan, transition into the civilian world. Education and
vocational training and employment opportunities will enable these
veterans to succeed in their future endeavors. Adequate funding will
allow the programs to increase staffing to provide comprehensive case
management job assistance to disabled and other eligible veterans.
Title 38 U.S.C. § 4103A requires that all DVOP specialists shall be
qualified veterans and that preference be given to qualified disabled
veterans in appointment to DVOP specialist positions. 38 U.S.C. §
4104(a)(4) states:
“[I]n the appointment of local veterans’ employment representatives on
or after July 1, 1988, preference shall be given to qualified eligible
veterans or eligible persons. Preference shall be accorded first to
qualified service-connected disabled veterans; then, if no such disabled
veteran is available, to qualified eligible veterans; and, if no such
eligible veteran is available, then to qualified eligible persons.”
The American Legion believes that the military experience is essential
to understanding the unique needs of the veteran and that all LVERs, as
well as all DVOPs, should be veterans.
The American Legion recommends a funding level of $342 million for the
Veterans’ Employment and Training Service in FY 2007.
CONCLUSION
Thank you for the opportunity for The American Legion to reiterate its
budget recommendations for FY 2007. Unfortunately, due to the scheduling
of this hearing, The American Legion was unable to make appropriate
comments specifically on the President’s budget request for FY 2007. The
American Legion will submit thorough views and estimates “for the
record” following this hearing.
Clearly, The American Legion remains deeply concerned with VA medical
funding in recent years. Repeatedly, the President advanced seriously
flawed legislative initiatives that undermined the “thanks of a grateful
nation.” Fortunately, Congress joined the veterans’ community in
rejecting them. The American Legion will continue to oppose any
“enrollment fees” targeted towards a selected group of veterans with the
goal of discouraging enrollment or that does not guarantee timely access
to quality health care in return.
The American Legion has joined with eight other veterans’ service
organizations in calling for an immediate fix of the broken annual
Federal appropriations process that is budget driven rather than demand
driven. In recent years, the Office of Management and Budget’s budgetary
recommendations to Congress fell well short of the mark. Congress, not
OMB, is responsible for providing adequate funding for VA medical care.
We do not see lengthy discussions on the “right amount” for funding
Social Security benefits, Medicare, Veterans’ Compensation and Pension,
TRICARE for Life or even your salaries as Members of Congress because
they are scored as mandatory funding items and, therefore, an
entitlement – funding that is guaranteed.
If an entitlement is a statement of national priority, where should the
care and treatment of veterans rank among Federal spending programs?
The American Legion respectfully requests a future Committee hearing on
evaluating the best funding methodology for VA medical care. This
hearing would also address alternative revenue streams to complement
annual Federal appropriations.
Mr. Chairman, that concludes my testimony.
|