STATEMENT OF
RICK SURRATT
DEPUTY NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE DIRECTOR
OF THE
DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS
BEFORE THE
COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
FEBRUARY 8, 2006
Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee:
I am pleased to have the opportunity to appear before you on behalf of
the Disabled American Veterans (DAV), as one of four of the
organizations that create The Independent Budget (IB) for veterans
programs, to discuss some of the IB recommendations for fiscal year (FY)
2007. As you know, the IB is a budget and policy document that sets
forth the collective views of the DAV, AMVETS, the Paralyzed Veterans of
America (PVA), and the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States
(VFW), with each organization having principal responsibility for a
major component of the budget. My testimony will focus primarily on the
benefit programs for veterans.
To improve administration of the benefit programs, the IB recommends
investments in information technology and training programs, adequate
resources to support a long-term strategy for improvement in claims
processing, and adequate staffing for the programs under the Veterans
Benefits Administration (VBA) of the Department of Veterans Affairs
(VA).
With the continually changing environment in claims processing and
benefits administration, VBA must continue to upgrade its information
technology infrastructure and revise its training tools to stay abreast
of program changes and modern business practices, to maintain
efficiency, and to meet ever increasing workload demands. In recent
years, Congress has provided reduced levels of funding for such VBA
initiatives, however. With restored investments in initiatives, VBA
could complement staffing adjustments for increased workloads with a
support infrastructure designed to increase operations effectiveness.
VBA could resume an adequate pace in its development and deployment of
information technology solutions, as well as upgrading and enhancement
of training systems, to improve operations and service delivery. Some of
the initiatives for priority funding are:
• Replacement of the antiquated and inadequate Benefits Delivery Network
(BDN) with VETSNET for C&P, The Education Expert System (TEES) for
Education Service, and Corporate WINRS (CWINRS) for VR&E
VETSNET serves to integrate several subsystems into one nationwide
information system for claims development and adjudication and payment
administration. TEES serves to provide for electronic transmission of
applications and enrollment documentation along with automated expert
processing. CWINRS is a case management and information system allowing
for more efficient award processing and sharing of information
nationwide.
• Continued development and enhancement of data-centric benefits
integration with “Virtual VA” and modification of The Imaging Management
System (TIMS), which serve to replace paper-based records with
electronic files for acquiring, storing, and processing of claims data
Virtual VA supports pension maintenance activities at three Pension
Maintenance Centers. Further enhancement would allow for the entire
claims and award process to be accomplished electronically. TIMS is the
Education Service’s system for electronic education claims files,
storage of imaged documents, and workflow management. This initiative is
to modify and enhance TIMS to make it fully interactive to allow for
fully automated claims and award processing by Education Service and VR&E
nationwide.
• Upgrading and enhancement of training systems
VA’s Training and Performance Support Systems (TPSS) is a multimedia,
multi-method training tool that applies Instructional Systems
Development (ISD) methodology to train and support employee performance
of job tasks. These TPSS applications require technical updating to
incorporate changes in laws, regulations, procedures, and benefit
programs. In addition to regular software upgrades, a help desk for
users is needed to make TPSS work effectively.
VBA initiated its “Skills Certification” instrument in 2004. This tool
aids VBA in assessing the knowledge base of Veterans Service
Representatives. VBA intends to develop additional skills certification
modules to test Rating Veterans Service Representatives, Decision Review
Officers, Field Examiners, Pension Maintenance Center employees, and
Education Veterans Claims Examiners.
• Accelerated implementation of Virtual Information Centers (VICs)
By providing veterans regionalized telephone contact access from
multiple offices within specified geographic locations, VA achieves
greater efficiency and improved customer service. Accelerated deployment
of VICs will more timely accomplish this beneficial effect.
Congress has reduced funding for VBA initiatives every year since 2001,
from $82 million in FY 2001 to $23 million in FY 2006. The IB calls for
restoration of funding for this purpose to the 2001 level, with a 5
percent adjustment for each year to cover inflation and increased
demands upon the system. The IB therefore recommends that Congress
provide $109.9 million for VBA initiatives in FY 2007.
To overcome the persistent and long-standing problem of large claims
backlogs and consequent protracted delays in the delivery of crucial
benefits to veterans and their families, VA must invest adequate
resources in a long-term strategy to improve quality, proficiency, and
efficiency. VA has neither maintained the necessary capacity to match
and meet its claims workload nor corrected systemic deficiencies that
compound the problem of inadequate capacity. Rather than making headway
and overcoming the chronic claims backlog and consequent protracted
delays in claims disposition, VA has lost ground to the problem, with
the backlog of pending claims growing substantially larger and benefit
awards being delayed.
Historically, many underlying causes acted in concert to bring on this
now intractable problem. These dynamics have been thoroughly detailed in
several studies into the problem. Most of the causes can be directly or
indirectly associated with inadequate resources. The problem was
triggered primarily, and is now perpetuated, by insufficient resources.
Insufficient resources are the result of misplaced priorities, in which
the agenda is to reduce spending on veterans’ programs despite a need
for greater resources to meet a growing workload in a time of war and a
need for added resources to overcome the deficiencies and failures of
the past. Instead of requesting the additional resources needed, the
President has sought and Congress has provided fewer resources. Recent
budgets have sought reductions in fulltime employees for VBA. Such
reductions in staffing are clearly at odds with the realities of VA’s
workload and its failure to improve quality and make gains against the
claims backlog. During congressional hearings, VA is forced to defend a
budget that it knows is inadequate.
The priorities and goals of the immediate political strategy are at odds
with the need for a long-term strategy by VA to fulfill its mission and
the nation’s moral obligation to disabled veterans in an effective
manner. VA must have a long-term strategy focused principally on
attaining quality and not merely achieving production numbers. It must
have adequate resources, and it must invest them in that long-term
strategy rather than reactively targeting them to short-term, temporary,
and superficial gains. Only then can the claims backlog really be
overcome. Only then will the system serve disabled veterans in a
satisfactory fashion, in which their needs are addressed timely with the
effects of disability alleviated by prompt delivery of benefits.
Veterans who suffer disability from military service should not also
have to needlessly suffer economic deprivation because of the
inefficiency of their government.
Adequate staffing is essential to any strategy to get claims processing
and backlogs under control. The IB recommends 10,820 FTE for
Compensation and Pension Service (C&P). During FY 2004 and FY 2005, the
total number of compensation, pension, and burial claims received in C&P
increased by 9 percent, from 735,275 at the beginning of FY 2003 to
801,960 at the end of FY 2005. This represents an average annual growth
rate in claims of 4.5 percent. During this same period, the number of
pending claims requiring rating decisions increased by more than 33
percent. (As the Undersecretary for Benefits has stated, “[c]laims that
require a disability rating determination are the primary workload
component because they are the most difficult, time consuming, and
resource intensive.”) With an aging veterans’ population and ongoing
hostilities in Iraq and Afghanistan, no reason exists to believe that
growth rate will decline during FY 2006 and FY 2007. With a 9 percent
increase over the FY 2005 number of claims, VA can expect 874,136 claims
for C&P in FY 2007. Moreover, legislation requiring VA to invite
veterans in six states to request review of past claims decisions and
ratings in their cases and to conduct outreach to invite new claims from
other veterans in these states will add substantially to the expected
increased workload. It is projected that, of the approximately 325,000
veterans receiving disability compensation and the additional estimated
50,000 who will be invited to file new claims, 15 percent will seek new
or increased benefits, resulting in an estimated 56,000 additional
claims. Given past claims processing times, much of this workload will
carry over into FY 2007, making the new total more than 930,000 claims
in FY 2007.
In its budget submission for FY 2006, VA projected production based on
an output of 109 claims per direct program FTE. The Independent Budget
Veterans Service Organizations have long argued that VA’s production
requirements do not allow for thorough development and careful
consideration of disability claims, resulting in compromised quality,
higher error and appeal rates, and even more overload on the system. In
addition to recommending staffing levels more commensurate with the
workload, we have maintained that VA should invest more in training
adjudicators and that it should hold them accountable for higher
standards of accuracy. In response to survey questions from VA’s Office
of Inspector General, nearly half of the adjudicators responding
admitted that many claims are decided without adequate record
development. They saw an incongruity between their objectives of making
legally correct and factually substantiated decisions and management
objectives of maximizing decision output to meet production standards
and reduce backlogs. Nearly half reported that it is generally or very
difficult to meet production standards without sacrificing quality.
Fifty-seven percent reported difficulty meeting production standards if
they make sure they have sufficient evidence for rating each case and
thoroughly review the evidence. Most attributed VA’s inability to make
timely and high quality decisions to insufficient staff. They indicated
that adjudicator training had not been a high priority in VA.
To allow for more time to be invested in training, we believe it prudent
to recommend staffing levels based on an output of 100 cases per year
for each direct program FTE. With an estimated 930,000 claims in FY
2007, that would require 9,300 direct program FTE. With the FY 2006
level of 1,520 support FTE added, this would require C&P to be
authorized 10,820 total FTE for FY 2007.
To meet its ongoing workload demands and to implement the important new
initiatives the VA Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment Task Force
recommended, VR&E needs increased staffing. As a part of its strategy to
enhance accountability and efficiency, the Task Force recommended
creation and training of 200 new staff positions for this purpose. Other
new initiatives recommended by the Task Force also require an investment
of personnel resources. With its increased reliance on contract
services, VR&E also needs approximately 50 additional FTE for management
and oversight of contract counselors and employment service providers.
As it has with its other benefit programs, VA has been striving to
provide more timely and efficient service to its claimants for education
benefits. Though the workload (number of applications and recurring
certifications, etc.) increased by 11 percent during FY 2004 and FY
2005, direct program FTE were reduced from 708 at the end of FY 2003 to
675 at the end of FY 2005. Based on experience during FY 2004 and FY
2005, it is very conservatively estimated that the workload will
increase by 5.5 percent in FY 2007. VA must increase staffing to meet
the existing and added workload, or service to veterans seeking
educational benefits will decline. Based on the number of direct program
FTE at the end of FY 2003 in relation to the workload at that time, VBA
must increase direct program staffing in its Education Service in FY
2007 to 873 FTE, 149 more direct program FTE than authorized for FY
2006. With the addition of the 160 support FTE as currently authorized,
Education Service should be provided 1,033 total FTE for FY 2007.
The benefit programs are effective for their intended purposes only to
the extent VBA can deliver benefits to entitled veterans and dependents
in a timely fashion. However, in addition to ensuring that VBA has the
resources necessary to accomplish its mission in that manner, Congress
must also make adjustments to the programs from time to time to address
increases in the cost of living and needed improvements. The IB makes a
number of recommendations to adjust rates and improve the benefit
programs administered by VBA. Some of those recommendations are:
• cost-of-living-adjustments for compensation, specially adapted housing
grants, and automobile grants, with provisions for automatic annual
increases in the housing and automobile grants based on increases in the
cost of living
• a presumption of service connection for hearing loss and tinnitus for
combat veterans and veterans who had military duties involving high
levels of noise exposure who suffer from tinnitus or hearing loss of a
type typically related to noise exposure or acoustic trauma
• removal of the provision that makes persons who first entered service
before June 30, 1985, ineligible for the Montgomery GI Bill, along with
other improvements to the program
• no increase in, and eventual repeal of, funding fees for VA home loan
guaranty
• increase in the maximum coverage and adjustment of the premium rates
for Service-Disabled Veterans’ Life Insurance
• increase in the maximum coverage available on policies of Veterans’
Mortgage Life Insurance
• legislation to restore protections for veterans’ benefits against
awards to third parties in divorce actions
We invite the Committee’s attention to the section of the IB addressing
the Benefit Programs for details on these and other IB recommendations
for improvement.
Another important component of our system of veterans’ benefits is the
right to appeal VA’s benefits decisions to an independent court. The IB
includes recommendations to improve the processes of judicial review in
veterans’ benefits matters. Again, we invite the Committee’s attention
to the IB for the details of these recommendations. In addition, the IB
recommends that Congress enact legislation to authorize and fund
construction of a courthouse and justice center for the United States
Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.
A continuing major concern is adequate funding for veterans’ medical
care. Because the Administration typically seeks funding substantially
below the amount necessary to maintain medical services for veterans and
because discretionary appropriations have continually fallen short of
what is needed, the IB supports legislation to fund veterans’ medical
care under a mandatory account. Ranking Member Lane Evans introduced
H.R. 515 for that purpose. His bill has 127 cosponsors, of which 10
cosponsors are members of this Committee. We urge the Chairman to
schedule a hearing on this bill.
Because of the timing of this hearing, we were unable to include our
views on the President’s budget in conjunction with our own
recommendations as we have historically done. For the benefit of the
Committee, we will therefore provide a written supplement to our
testimony to address the President’s budget.
In preparing the IB, the four partners draw upon their extensive
experience with the workings of veterans’ programs, their firsthand
knowledge of the needs of America’s veterans, and the information gained
from their continual monitoring of workloads and demands upon, as well
as the performance of, the veterans’ benefits system. Historically, this
Committee has acted favorably on many of our recommendations to improve
services to veterans and their families, and we hope you will give our
recommendations full and serious consideration again this year.
|