STATEMENT OF DENNIS M. CULLINAN, DIRECTOR
NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE SERVICE
VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES
MR. CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE
SUBCOMMITTEE:
On behalf of the 2.6 million men and women of the Veterans of Foreign
Wars of the United States and our Ladies Auxiliary, I would like to
thank you for allowing us to comment on this important subject.
Members of the VFW and all veterans have a vested interest in the
compensation system of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA) health
care providers. We believe that to remain competitive with the private
sector, VA must be allowed greater flexibility in setting compensation
levels for its health care providers.
Unfortunately, and to the detriment of veterans, VA does not currently
have this payroll flexibility and the current salary structure has been
in place since 1991. Consequently, VA’s physician pay lags far behind
what the private sector can pay--in certain specialties by as much as
67%.
As a result, the recruitment and retention of quality health care
physicians has become increasingly difficult, especially in certain
critical specialties. System wide, VA is nearly 2000 full-time
physicians short. Further VA is over 100 physicians short in specialties
such as Anesthesiology, cardiology, gastroenterology, internal medicine,
psychiatry and radiology. VA just is not able to compete with the
salaries offered by the private sector.
To some extent, VA can overcome this disadvantage. Doctors at VA have a
significant burden lessened in the amount of malpractice insurance they
must carry, resulting in a substantial savings for them. Additionally,
their affiliations with many medical schools affords their doctors
increased opportunities for research, as well as additional compensation
possibilities through the school. In some areas, however, this is not
enough. And in certain facilities, where there is no medical school
affiliation, it is impossible altogether.
To compensate for the employment shortfall, VA must, in effect, shoot
itself in the foot. VA contracts for care from local physicians at
prevailing market rates. VA will not pay these rates to actually put a
physician on staff, yet they will pay these higher rates to have this
physician work alongside other VA staff. This does not make any sense.
When combined with the growing numbers of veterans seeking access to VA
health care, the inability of VA to fill these provider positions is a
contributory factor towards the access problems that plague the VA
health care system. With a full health care staff, it is likely that the
nearly 100,000 veterans who have been waiting six months or more for
their primary health care appointments would be significantly fewer and
that we would hear fewer horror stories of two-year waits for specialty
care appointments.
Providing proper physician compensation is necessary to ensure that our
nation’s veterans receive the first-rate timely health care they earned
through their service; these two issues are directly intertwined. As
such, we would endorse any legislation that would increase the
recruitment and retention of quality physicians and health care
providers, thereby improving the quality of care our nations’ veterans
receive.
This concludes my testimony. I would be happy to answer any questions
that you or the members of the Subcommittee may have.
|