Honorable Steve Buyer, Chairman
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations
Committee on Veterans Affairs
Hearing on VA’s Role in the Development of Interoperable
Electronic-Medical Records Systems in the Federal Government
May 19, 2004
Good morning. Today’s hearing is entitled, VA’s Role in the Development
of Interoperable Electronic-Medical Records Systems in the Federal
Government. During a recent visit at the Baltimore Veterans Medical
Center, President Bush said: “The 21st-century health care system is
using a 19th-century paperwork system.” He went on to say: “These old
methods of keeping records are real threats to patients and their safety
and are incredibly costly.” The President has proposed $100 million for
2005 for demonstration projects of IT health care.
While this Subcommittee has held a number of hearings on the importance
of moving toward electronic medical records, today’s hearing will bring
a new element into the discussion. I am referring to the potential
savings in health care costs that could be realized by moving from paper
records to electronic medical records.
According to Dr. Blackford Middleton, Chairman of the Center for
Information Technology Leadership, and I quote, “Standardized
information exchange would save the nation $86.8 billion each year.
Clearly, we must accelerate efforts to focus national policy discussions
on implementing standardized healthcare information exchange and
interoperability.” Dr. Blackford made this statement before the
Healthcare Information Management Systems Society (HIMSS) on February
23, 2004. In fact, we asked Dr. Middleton to be a witness at this
morning’s hearing. Unfortunately, he was unable to do so but indicated
that he would be happy to testify another time.
Dr. Middleton’s statement is a fitting introduction to today’s hearing
and the important steps that have already been taken to standardize
health information.
The VA has played a pivotal role in laying the groundwork for setting
health information standards to be used across the government. Over the
last two years the VA has worked with the Departments of Defense and
Health and Human Services to build upon the five standards which were
announced by HHS on March 21, 2003. More recently, on May 6, 2004, the
Departments of Defense, Veterans Affairs and HHS announced the adoption
of 15 additional standards agreed upon by the Consolidated Health
Informatics Initiative, which is an integral part of the
e-Gov Initiatives of the Administration.
Dr. Jonathan Javitt, a member of the Subcommittee on Health Care
Delivery and IT of the President’s Information Technology Advisory
Committee is our lead witness today. I am sure we all look forward to
hearing his perspective in his role as a member of the President’s
health IT team.
Today’s hearing will also focus on the progress which has been made by
the VA and DOD in their joint effort to develop and deploy electronic
medical records that are interoperable, bi-directional and
standards-based. According to the GAO’s current assessment of the top
five priorities that still need to be addressed in 2004, I was surprised
to learn that the basic fundamental process of program design such as
the development of an architecture for the electronic interface that
articulates system requirements, design specifications, and software
descriptions have not been agreed upon. I must ask a basic question,
Shouldn’t these basic functions have been identified before the project
got under way? GAO also cited the need for project milestones and
precise performance measures to provide for the basis of comprehensive
program management, progressive decision making, and authorization of
funding for each step in the development process. Again, this is rather
basic. Having a business plan with measurable outcomes should be in
place on the front end not on the back end of a project. VA and DOD have
been working on this initiative since 1998 -- without these key elements
in place. This does not represent good program management.
So, after 6 years and $ 668.7 million we have a system that is capable
of a one-way transfer of information. I’m not sure I would categorize
this as a great success. I hope you prove me wrong today by telling me
that you have made substantial progress beyond the Federal Health
Information Exchange and that the implementation date for CHCS II is on
target. I will close by saying that I believe with thousands of service
members returning from Iraq and Afghanistan they should not have to
endure other battles in order to receive timely transition to VA health
care and benefits.
|