STATEMENT OF
CORNELIO R. HONG, M.D., F.A.C.P.
VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES
MARCH 30, 2004
MR. CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS
OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE:
Thank you for the opportunity to testify before you today on this
important subject.
As part of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA) comprehensive
medical care benefits package, veterans enrolled in the VA health care
system are granted a pharmaceutical benefit. Veterans pay a $7
co-payment for each 30-day supply of medication. The co-payments are
waived if the prescription is for a service connected condition, or if
the veteran is severely disabled or indigent. With relatively few
exceptions, such as for certain veterans living in Alaska, VA will only
provide medication for prescriptions written by VA physicians, not
outside physicians.
This policy, in effect, denies veterans their earned pharmaceutical
benefit. It forces veterans to make medically unnecessary appointments
for health care screenings through the department. However, when the
veteran makes that appointment, he or she frequently finds that they
must wait months for that appointment. In the face of these delays, many
of these veterans are turning to their outside physicians for timely
health care, as you or I would do. They then find themselves unable to
have these prescriptions filled at VA, so they are either forced to
completely abandon the VA health care system, or to take their place at
the back of a long line for a VA appointment.
Although significant progress has been made in reducing this backlog of
appointments, increasing demand for health care by veterans and funding
levels that have not kept pace, access to the system is far from
optimal. At one time, it was estimated that nearly 300,000 veterans were
on a waiting list for at least six months for a basic health care
appointment. While the number of veterans waiting that long is
significantly lower, there are still many thousands of veterans who must
still unacceptably wait month after month.
I continue to believe that a significant portion of that backlog is made
up of veterans waiting solely for prescriptions from VA. Early
indications from VA’s temporary Transitional Pharmacy Benefit Program (TBP)
support our conclusion. Despite a very narrow definition of who was
eligible for the benefit, VA’s statistics show that 8,200 of the 41,200
eligible veterans (20%) utilized the program. Extrapolating these
numbers out to the entire VA population, it is clear that a substantial
number of veterans are being denied part of their complete VA health
care benefit.
The solution is simple. Veterans must be allowed to bring their private
prescriptions to VA. It is a solution that benefits both parties
involved: the veteran and VA.
For veterans, the benefits are obvious. They would be free from policies
that inhibit their ability to receive a benefit they earned while
defending this country. If that 20% figure holds up system-wide, the
veterans’ population would be getting the pharmaceuticals it needs to
combat illness and disease, especially as it grows older. These would be
the same pharmaceuticals and treatments they would receive if they had
complete access to the VA health care system; it would not provide them
any additional benefits, just access to a current one, which is severely
limited.
Additionally, as a medical doctor, I can attest to the importance of
patient/doctor relationships in maintaining optimum health. When access
problems turned many veterans away from VA health care, they began
establishing or reaffirming old relationships with their physicians. The
communication, signals and history a doctor establishes with a regular
patient enables us to better serve the patient’s needs. It leads to
better medicine.
For VA, it would free up health care resources, which are stretched to
the breaking point, in part, because of this prohibition. The extra
health assessments and screenings VA undertakes duplicate the same
procedures the outside physician performs. The second screening is
medically unnecessary; a physician has already determined the diagnosis.
All it does is waste the veteran’s time and wastes health care resources
that could be better spent on sick and disabled veterans who truly need
VA health care. In fact, a December 2000 VA Inspector General Report
found that, “the costs of re-examining the veteran in order to fill the
privately written prescriptions are significant and could be reduced
with a more streamlined process.” The report estimated that these
re-examination costs totaled $1.3 billion in fiscal year 2001 alone.
Yes, we would probably expect the demand for prescriptions to increase,
but this increased cost could be significantly offset by the reduced
duplication of services and through co-payments and third party
collections. Further, a December 2002 GAO study found that Priority 7
veterans, who at that time included the current Priority 8 veterans,
utilized just 13% of VA’s net pharmacy expenditures despite these
veterans accounting for 22% of the patient population. They used less
than their proportion of resources. Again, we would argue that, despite
the increased demand, it would not be providing any additional benefits,
just equitable access to that benefit.
To that end, the draft bill we are considering today would be a great
benefit to those it covers. This bill would allow veterans receiving
disability compensation or who are indigent to have outside
prescriptions filled through VA. Additionally, it extends the same
benefit to any Medicare-eligible veteran.
For those Medicare-eligible veterans to have their prescriptions filled
through VA, they must, however, give up their right to VA health care
services for one calendar year. This is an unacceptable choice. Veterans
have earned the right to the full comprehensive benefits package. They
should not be required to give up one portion of that package to secure
access to another. Yes, these veterans would have Medicare to fall back
on and it is entirely possible that some of these veterans would use
Medicare anyway, but we cannot accept that as their sole health care
option. VA is charged with providing the full continuum of health care
to this nation’s veterans. Forcing veterans out of the health care
system turns VA into nothing but a pharmacy. Their other health care
needs would be neglected. Veterans should be able to turn to VA, the
health care system set up just for their unique health care needs. This
draft legislation would deny them that right.
Despite this, the bill is a solid step in the right direction. It
provides a better benefit to more veterans at a cheaper cost than the
complex Medicare prescription drug benefit. It would greatly benefit
those veterans who could not otherwise afford prescription drugs.
In regard to the section of this bill that addresses immunizations, it
appears that a more comprehensive immunization benefit must be
addressed. Any veteran who is enrolled with VA should be able to receive
immunizations free of cost as long as the immunization is recommended by
the CDC in the National Immunization program. Preventive medicine is the
most cost effective way of caring for any section of our population. For
most of our veterans the complications of preventable diseases compound
all other underlying health problems.
It is clear that the time for pharmaceutical reform is now. VA’s current
policies preclude veterans from accessing an earned benefit and the
solution before us is an excellent step that would be beneficial to each
stakeholder.
Mr. Chairman, this concludes my testimony. I would be happy to answer
any questions that you or the members of this Committee may have.
|