Testimony of Terence M. Keane,
Ph.D.
Director, Behavioral Sciences Division
National Center for PTSD
VA Boston Healthcare System
&
Professor of Psychiatry, Psychology, & Behavioral Neuroscience
Boston University School of Medicine
INTRODUCTION:
My name is Terence M. Keane, Ph.D. For more than twenty-five years I’ve
been actively involved in providing psychological care for veterans with
war-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). With colleagues we
established the first outpatient treatment program for PTSD in a VA
Medical Center at the Sonny Montgomery VA in Jackson, Mississippi in the
late 1970’s. In 1989 I was named Director of the Behavioral Sciences
Division of the National Center for PTSD with responsibilities spanning
epidemiological studies, the development and refinement of assessment
and diagnostic instruments, and the promotion of evidence based
psychological treatment methods for PTSD.
For three years I served on the inaugural Special Committee on PTSD
(1984-87); since 1986 I’ve had oversight responsibility for the National
Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Study; and I’ve received twenty-four
consecutive years of competitive funding from VA, the National
Institutes of Health, Substance Abuse Mental Health Services
Administration (SAMHSA), and a variety of foundations in order to
support our research program on PTSD.
In 1980 I was named Chief of Psychology in Jackson and then in 1985 I
became Chief in Boston. Currently, I have administrative and clinical
responsibility there for all mental health services at the Boston
outpatient clinics. As well, I have overall responsibility for the
educational and training programs in psychology. These are some of the
largest training programs in the country and include the only NIMH
funded postdoctoral training program for PTSD in VA. Due to the quality
of the clinical, teaching, and research programming on PTSD, VA Boston
was designated as a VA Clinical Center of Excellence in PTSD for the
past four years, one of only two such centers in all of VA.
In the wake of the terrorist attacks on New York City and the Pentagon I
became actively involved in several panels assembled by multiple federal
agencies, including VA, NIMH, and DOD. These panels were charged with
identifying best practices for the early intervention for people exposed
to massive trauma. As well, I’ve participated in separate policy
conferences for the psychological care of war veterans in many different
countries including the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, Kuwait, and
Croatia to name a few.
As a function of these various roles and responsibilities I would like
to present my perspective on clinical, research, and educational status
of VA in its efforts to manage the large cohort of veterans with PTSD
from prior eras as new cases of PTSD emerge from our military
engagements in Iraq, Afghanistan, Bosnia, and our peacekeeping efforts
in various parts of the world including Africa and the Caribbean.
STATUS OF CLINICAL PROGRAMS:
Data from the Northeast Program Evaluation Center (www.nepec.org)
indicate that in FY 2002: a) there were more than 180,000 veterans
service connected for PTSD, sixty percent of whom received mental health
care from VA; b) there was a 15% increase in the number of veterans
treated for PTSD system wide from FY2001-02; and c) there was a
concomitant five percent decrease during the same period in the number
of inpatient discharges for PTSD consistent with the refocusing of
mental health care to outpatient care. Presently, VA provides
psychological treatment to approximately 87,000 veterans with PTSD
annually with costs estimated at $250 million. With the increase in
enrollment of veterans seeking PTSD services, VA is attempting to meet
the challenge of providing care for PTSD veterans.
In the last eight years VA has emphasized the transition of care from an
inpatient to an outpatient locus to enhance patient access and
satisfaction with care. This transition was premised in the reduction of
costly inpatient care and the reengineering of resources to the
provision of less costly outpatient care. These are laudable goals. In
some instances many of these resources were reallocated to outpatient
mental health care; and in other cases few if any were reallocated, thus
placing increased pressure on the system to care for a growing number of
eligible veterans. Many facilities do not offer individualized
psychological care, emphasizing the more efficient group models of care.
Unfortunately, group therapies for PTSD have little evidence to support
their effectiveness.
VA is the international leader in the psychological care of its military
veterans. This is, to a large extent, due to the proliferation of
programs in the 1980’s and early 1990’s. As well, this is due to the
outstanding research and education programs that are a part of VA’s
mission. These research and educational programs remain intact largely
due to the support of VA’s Medical Research Service and Academic Affairs
who continue to provide support for the next generation of researchers
and clinicians in PTSD. In addition, continuing education programs
sponsored by VA Learning University frequently address the problems of
men and women with military related PTSD. The effect of this is that VA
has a well-trained workforce for managing chronic PTSD.
A focus of VA needs to be the continued training in the management of
acute cases of PTSD and in the provision of early interventions for
those at greatest risk for the development of chronic course of PTSD. VA
responded to the terrorist attacks on the US through the National Center
for PTSD, utilizing its nationally recognized website (www.ncptsd.org),
and assuming a leadership role for VA in educating clinicians in the
system about the acute needs of service men and women returning from the
war on terror. These efforts were timely, but there needs to be a more
focused and continuous effort to train the workforce in the treatment of
acute stress disorder and acute PTSD using contemporary methods.
VA’s international leadership in the problems of psychological trauma is
a function of the many specialized programs for PTSD nationwide
(including Readjustment Counseling), the research and educational
programs that VA supports, the outstanding Mental Illness Research,
Education, and Clinical Centers that are funded by VA, and also the
consistent productivity of the National Center for PTSD under the
leadership of Matthew Friedman, M.D., Ph.D. These resources provide the
foundation for continued excellence in the area of PTSD and should be
supported and perhaps even enhanced in this time of war.
Needed in VA at this time is a specific focus on acute cases of PTSD. In
particular we have a need to capitalize on the growth in knowledge
internationally on methods and models to prevent the development of
chronic PTSD among those at greatest risk. In the past ten years members
of the scientific community have worked to identify the key risk factors
that lead to the development of PTSD among those exposed to war-zone
stressors.
Recent clinical trials provided new scientific information on the
success of early psychological interventions after trauma exposure.
Bringing this new information into the field should be a priority. We
have the technology and the knowledge to begin the process of
introducing these new treatments to the field. Evaluating its impact and
measuring the process of treatments delivered by alternative new
technologies is important for the United States to remain the
international leader in the psychological trauma field.
How can this be achieved? Possibly VA could create centers of excellence
in early interventions for war trauma, centers that would provide the
leadership in this emerging field of care. Implicit in the focus of
these centers of excellence would be the innovative delivery of care to
those people at greatest risk for developing PTSD; one particular focus
would be the integration of physical and mental health services acutely
to those who’ve sustained significant injuries. A second focus would be
on those who require long-term rehabilitation for war injuries. Another
component of such centers would be the use of the Internet and
telecommunications for the rapid and convenient delivery of care for
people exposed to undue war-zone stress. Making these services
available, evaluating and improving them with empirical methods, and
serving as a standard for the delivery of care in creative new ways will
be a few of the objectives for such centers. In the very near future it
may well be possible to provide effective psychological and
psychopharmacological treatments for people soon after exposure to
traumatic events. Centers for Early Interventions for Trauma would
insure that VA would be the national leader in this arena. These Centers
would be resources for VA, DOD, and for the public health system of the
United States more broadly.
Academic Affairs in VA is one major resource for training the future
workforce of VA. It is remarkably effective. At Boston University, VA
rotations are decidedly the most popular and the most frequently sought
rotations in our psychiatry and psychology training programs. We have
trainees in medical school and in graduate school in clinical
psychology, on internship and residency, and we have postdoctoral
fellowships for psychologists and psychiatrists specifically in the area
of PTSD. Often these candidates would prefer to stay within VA, but are
taking positions in the private sector because of our inability to hire.
STATUS OF EPIDEMIOLOGICAL RESEARCH STUDY:
The National Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Study was a landmark
achievement for the Department of Veterans Affairs. Completed in 1988 at
a cost of nearly $10 million, this unprecedented and award winning study
represented the first time that a country sought to effectively
understand and measure the psychological impact of a war on the men and
women sent to fight it. The NVVRS became the benchmark for
methodological rigor for psychiatric epidemiological studies throughout
the next decade. In addition, its influence on public policy was
impressive. VA responded to the findings by establishing a wide range of
treatment programs across the country, programs that are largely still
functioning today in some fashion. These programs treat the 87,000
veterans with PTSD from all eras who come to VA today.
In FY 2002, Congress mandated a systematic follow up of the veterans
cohorts to determine the long-term course of PTSD and to study the
physical health consequences of contracting this condition. The NVVRS
veterans are the only representative sample of veterans from that era
and so findings from the cohort will be generalizable to the entire
population of male and female Vietnam Theater Veterans. The findings of
this study would assist VA in planning for mental and physical health
services among this cohort. With $5 million allocated to plan the study,
VA let a sole source contract to the Research Triangle Institute in
North Carolina.
Extensive planning was initiated in October of 2002 with a Scientific
Advisory Board consisting of outstanding epidemiological experts. This
study was an unusually complex one in that it was the first time that
excellent psychiatric measurement was to be employed in conjunction with
state of the art physical health measurement. Expectedly, the estimated
costs of this study began to rise. In November 2003, we in VA decided to
place the study out to bid in order to insure that the price of this
study was the best possible and that we received the optimal study for
the cost. As a result of this decision, the results of the study will be
delayed for an indeterminate period of time. The delivery date for this
report was originally scheduled to be September 30, 2004. We will have a
better estimate of the delivery date once the new contract is initiated.
SUMMARY OF POINTS:
• VA is unquestionably the international leader in treatment, education,
and research on war zone related PTSD.
• With the existing demand for services high and the possibility for
increased demand from new veterans, there is a need for creativity in
the development and delivery of effective interventions. Redirected
resources, or greater use of the resources saved by re-engineering
inpatient to outpatient care, should be considered.
• PTSD treatment programs for women veterans exist to some extent in Vet
Centers with far fewer specialized resources in VA medical facilities.
The needs for treating combat stress, war zone stress, sexual
harassment, and sexual assault are increasing in this component of the
VA population. Recent studies of assault and harassment in Reservists
and National Guard troops underscore the growing needs of these veterans
for specialized treatment.
• VA is presented with an opportunity to take the national lead in the
development and evaluation of the effectiveness of early psychological
and psychopharmacological interventions for promoting resilience and
preventing adverse outcomes following exposure to traumatic events.
Consideration for sponsoring Centers for Early Interventions for Trauma
is one way to assert this leadership in a pressing national issue.
• Use of telecommunications, especially the world-wide web, for
surveillance, treatment, and evaluation of early interventions will be
one efficient approach for managing these complex problems in cost
effective ways. They may prove to be indispensable for the Seamless
Transition implemented between VA and DOD for care of injured Americans.
• Support for developing innovative rehabilitative methods for war
injured veterans through MIRECC’s, Medical Research, Academic Affairs,
and the National Center for PTSD will assure that VA will continue to
attract top clinicians, teachers, and researchers into its next
generation of healthcare providers. This is an important priority.
• Filling vacancies in high priority areas such as combat related PTSD
treatment should be a priority.
• Critical information on the longitudinal course of PTSD and its health
consequences will be derived from the follow up study of the National
Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Study. These data will provide valuable
information for setting future healthcare priorities for this generation
of veterans. This Congressionally mandated study, due to Congress on
September 30, 2004, will be delayed due to its complexity and the
related costs.
Thank you for this opportunity to present to you this morning.
|