Statement of
The Honorable Harry Van Sickle
Commissioner
Union County, PA
and
Chair of the Labor and Employment Steering Committee
National Association of Counties
June 23, 2004
Chairman Smith, Ranking Member Evans and other distinguished members of
this committee; my name is Harry Van Sickle and I am a county
commissioner from Union County, Pennsylvania. I am also the Chair of the
Labor and Employment Steering Committee for the National Association of
Counties (NACo), the only organization representing America’s counties
in Washington, DC. NACo has more than 2,000 member counties,
representing 85 percent of the nation’s population.
County officials throughout the country strongly support the men and
women serving in the military, including those in our civilian workforce
called to duty during times of heightened conflict to protect our
nation. On behalf of county officials, I would like to express to you
the extreme gratitude we feel towards those who have left their families
and civilian jobs to serve for our country. We commend and appreciate
our military troops for their vital service and sacrifice. Given the
serious sacrifice these men and women have made and are making, county
governments are striving to be the model workplace environment for these
men and women serving on our behalf. County governments are diligently
working to ensure smooth transition for these civilian employees into
active military service and return to county government employment upon
their safe return home.
I am deeply honored to be here today and would like to thank the
chairman for the opportunity to testify on behalf of NACo regarding how
county government employers are protecting the rights of civilian
employees deployed for military service. As public sector employers,
county governments play a critical role in planning, management and
implementation of labor and employment laws. County governments strive
to be the model workplace by upholding federal, state, and local
workplace rules and by providing all employees with work friendly
environments and benefit plans and packages that are responsive to the
needs and desires of county employees. The benefits provided by county
governments reflect the values of the community such as competitive
salaries, enhanced health care, adequate pension and retirement systems,
employee assistance programs and other services that meet individual
employee needs including those of reservists.
County governments are diligently working to ensure that the rights of
those civilian employees deployed for military service are protected. In
response to the federal laws and recent increases in military deployment
many counties have followed the lead of the Uniformed Services
Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) and adopted policies and
procedures with supplementary rights and benefits in addition to those
provided by USERRA. This is to ensure the transition into active
military service and return to county government employment goes as
smoothly as possible for these employees, their families and in turn the
county. The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act
was established to encourage non-career service in the military by
preventing discrimination and minimizing disadvantages to service and
civilian employment as well as disruption to such employees, their
families and employers. USERRA protects employment and re-employment
rights of qualified employees and their employment benefits. Across the
breadth of this country, there may be examples of less than full
compliance in state and local jurisdictions, but USERRA, state and local
laws adequately address such complaints.
I will share with you some of the policies and procedures counties have
adopted on their own in response to their civilian employees being
deployed for military service and will highlight some of the challenges
counties meet and practices counties employ to handle these challenges.
I will also briefly address HR 4477, The Patriotic Employer Act of 2004,
which would require employers to post notices of rights and duties under
USERRA and other draft changes for the Act.
Since U.S. military deployment significantly increased post - September
11, 2001 county government employers have dealt with the influx of
personnel going to serve and returning home in a number of ways. NACo
recently surveyed member counties and received over 150 responses from
27 states. Responses indicated that counties are using a number of
methods to ensure transitions go as smoothly as possible for such
reserve employees. While there were reports of a few problems, all those
cited were resolved by the county officials in an appropriate manner.
County Policies and Benefits
USERRA requires employers to retain employment and benefits for civilian
employees called to military duty. Many county government employers
surveyed not only retain these positions; they also continue to provide
such employees with their full salary. Specifically, some counties
supplement the difference between the employee’s county salary and
military salary if their county pay is higher, usually until their
release from active military service by proper authority. DeKalb County,
Illinois follows a state “hold harmless” policy of covering the
difference in pay for those employees serving.
Other counties provide the option of allowing deployed employees to use
their vacation and or sick time to supplement their pay before placing
them on military leave without pay. Other counties have a combination
where they pay the difference in their county and military salary after
such employees use vacation leave built up. Keep in mind all employees
called to serve receive a military pay while actively serving,
regardless of the additional options the county employer may provide.
While the military provides health benefits for those civilians called
to serve and their dependents, by federal law counties are required to
provide the option of medical benefits coverage to those on a military
leave of absence for up to 18 months, which the employee can be required
to pay. Several counties surveyed offer continuing health and medical
benefits coverage for employees and their dependents. Some counties even
pay the employees’ portion of expenses for these benefits along with
employer part during the time such employees serve in the military. Many
civilians opt for continued coverage under their county government
benefits to provide continuity in services for their family members.
Imperial County, California adopted policy and procedure for military
leave of absence which provides the County sponsored health and life
insurance plan for covered employees and their dependents. At the
employee’s option they may choose to continue present health, dental or
life insurance plans, however any additional costs shall be paid by
employee or by County pursuant to existing bargaining unit agreement or
county policy.
Other County Support
Unofficially, there are many county government employers that keep in
touch with their civilian employees deployed for service. Many employers
send monthly care packages to uniformed members and check up on their
family members. Other county employers even assist family members with
home improvement chores such as cutting the grass and keeping the
sidewalks clean to ensure family members left behind are not forgotten.
Several counties have ceremonies of appreciation for returning service
members and their families to recognize the importance of their service.
Challenges for County Government Employers
Counties have faced some challenges during this time of increased
military deployments.
Filling the gaps during the employees’ military deployment has been the
primary challenge for county governments, particularly in the areas of
public safety including police, sheriffs, firefighters and other
emergency personnel. Already stretched due to heightened homeland
security concerns losing even one of these vital workers can affect
important county services, particularly in rural areas. Most counties
surveyed do not hire temporary workers due to budgetary constraints.
Most counties that have lost sheriffs and police officers cope without
hiring additional personnel due to county budget constraints and
additional training costs. Some counties use trainees from fire and
police academies on a part-time basis for certain duties.
Many counties that hire temporary workers have faced challenges in
recruiting employees due to the temporary status of the employment.
Temporary workers who have been employed longer than a year sometimes
move on due to lack of permanency guarantees by county governments.
Since counties can face quick turnovers in temporary workers they must
deal with the cycle of hiring again and retraining.
For other counties, it has been difficult financially to supplement
differences between military and civilian pay when tours for such
employees are significantly extended. They also face the dilemma of
whether to hire temporary workers. Depending on the numbers of their
civilian workforce deployed calculating the salary adjustments have
initially been challenging for some, but counties understand the
importance of getting the information correct and are carefully handling
such changes.
Employees Returning
Regarding reservists returning to county positions, NACo did not learn
of any major difficulties with employees returning to their county jobs
after military service. Some county employers have faced the reality
that many employees are not ready to start their civilian jobs right
away. While federal law provides for a period upon which employees
should return, a few counties have adopted policies to allow for
continued leave for up to a year for such employees to make adjustments
back to civilian life. Imperial County, California gives employees
returning up to one year from the date of honorable discharge to return
to county employment. Also, in cases where counties hired temporary
workers most have to be let go and the returning employee may need
extensive re-training to get up to speed on their job duties.
Some counties have also reported that supervisors may change while
employees are deployed and may not be familiar with USERRA, so there is
some education that human resources departments do in such cases. For
example, in Henrico County, Virginia an employee deployed for over a
year who was reinstated upon his return was scheduled for a merit
increase, but the new supervisor was unaware of it. The HR department
caught the omission and the employee was given a salary increase with
retroactive pay as well. HR departments are educating and re-educating
supervisors who may not know or recall rules and rights under USERRA.
Draft Changes to USERRA
With regard to the draft language changes to USERRA, while NACo does not
have any specific policy on these issues currently, we have considered
the changes and understand the importance of HR 4477. Also, the
potential health benefits extension from 18 months to 24 months would
not pose unbearable problems for county employers since the employees
themselves called for service would be required to cover such health
expenses. Furthermore, NACo has no position on reinstating reporting
requirements for the Department of Labor, unless it would somehow
adversely affect county government employers.
Mr. Chairman, this concludes my testimony. I thank you and the committee
for the opportunity to be here today, and would be pleased to answer any
questions.
|