STATEMENT BY
LTC PAUL F. PASQUINA
MEDICAL DIRECTOR FOR THE U.S. ARMY AMPUTEE PATIENT CARE PROGRAM
JULY 22, 2004
Chairman Smith and Members of the Committee, I am LTC Paul F. Pasquina,
M.D., the Chief of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Medical
Director of the Amputee Program at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. It
is with great pleasure that I appear before this Committee to discuss
the care of our Armed Forces Members.
Amputee Clinical Care Background Information
Providing optimal care requires the development of a well functioning
and coordinated multidisciplinary team. Experience at WRAMC has
supported the creation of a dedicated Amputee Inpatient Service as well
as a separate Outpatient Amputee Clinic under the management of Physical
Medicine & Rehabilitation (PM&R). Following a rehabilitation model, the
physiatrist functions as the primary care provider for the amputee,
coordinating the recommendations and interventions of multiple medical
and surgical subspecialists, therapists, nurses, prosthetists,
psychologists, and social workers. This not only assures that holistic
care is provided, but also helps to improve the quality and
standardization of care across a healthcare system. Critical elements to
the functioning of the team include: strong leadership, clear
designation of duties and responsibilities, an ongoing educational
program, and most of all, communication.
The ongoing educational program must be all encompassing, while at the
same time target individual disciplines. This is facilitated by
identifying key leaders within each service (PM&R, nursing, orthopedics,
prosthetics, occupational and physical therapy, and psychology). It is
the responsibility of these leaders to identify the educational needs of
their services and then the responsibility of the program to ensure
these educational needs are met. This can be facilitated in a
cost-effective way by bringing in outside experts or partnering with
existing national organizations such as the Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA), the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA),
public and private universities, as well as private companies and
foundations. Issues of a cross-disciplinary nature such as pain and
wound management, psychological adjustment, etc. should be presented in
a forum where all disciplines are present to facilitate
inter-disciplinary discussion.
In order to facilitate communication and patient flow through the
medical system at WRAMC the following flowchart was established (see
figure).
Figure: Patient flow for combat amputees at Walter Reed Army Medical
Center (WRAMC). MICU = medical intensive care unit, PEB = Physical
Evaluation Board, PM&R = Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, RTN =
return, and SICU = surgical intensive care unit.
In addition to creating an amputee care program model to help streamline
and standardize patient care, our experience over the past year managing
young traumatic combat amputees has brought to light many critical
elements and lessons learned. We continue to discover ways to integrate
advances in technology and medicine to optimize care and hopefully
positively influence rapid recovery and long-term quality of life.
Examples of these critical elements are discussed in the following
sections.
Pain Management:
Over the past several years, new Joint Commission on Accreditation of
Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) standards, as well as the recognition
of Pain Medicine as a distinct medical subspecialty by the Accreditation
Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), has not only sensitized
the entire nation on a patient’s right to pain management but has also
lead to advances within the field. At WRAMC, extensive groundwork had
already been accomplished prior to OIF/OEF to ensure that proper pain
management systems were in place.
Nurses, physicians, and therapists all play critical roles in ensuring
recognition of pain problems and optimizing care. Research supports the
importance of effective pain control to allow a patient to participate
in therapy, as well as in reducing long-term pain complications, such as
residual limb and phantom limb pain. Our experience has shown that
adequate pain control in most combat amputees requires a multi-modal
medication approach. Nearly every patient is provided a patient
controlled anesthesia (PCA) pump during the perioperative period and
then quickly converted to long-acting opioids after his or her
definitive surgery is performed. Short-acting opioids are also used for
breakthrough pain or pre-medication prior to therapy. Most patients are
also prescribed an anticonvulsant (gabapentin, oxcarbazepine,
lamotrigine), a Tricyclic Antidepressant (Nortriptyline, Amitriptyline,
Desiprimine), and a Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory agent (NSAID-typically
one that is COX-2 selective, given the number and nature of
comorbidities as well as frequent concurrent use of anticoagulation
medication). We have found quetiapine fumarate to be a very effective
sleep aid, especially in cases when the soldier reports trouble with
nightmares. In addition to pharmacological management, we have found
physical agent modalities (ice, heat), desensitization and
transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) units helpful.
Perhaps most effective, however, has been the support of the Regional
Anesthesia Team. The placement of peripheral infusion catheters to the
brachial, lumbo-sacral plexus, or sciatic nerves has had a dramatic
positive effect on pain control, reduction in medication use, and
participation in therapy.
Medical Management:
As mentioned earlier, most combat amputees face multiple comorbidities
and greater risk for secondary complications. Traumatic amputees are at
increased risk for development of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) both in
their intact and residual limb. For prophylaxis all patients are started
on low molecular weight heparin (Enoxaparin), unless contraindicated. We
have also noticed that a high percentage of combat amputees develop
heterotopic ossification (HO). Whether this correlates with the nature
of injury (typically, from a blast), the patient’s age, or perhaps the
presence of comorbid head injury is unclear. The secondary effects of
HO, may lead to significant pain and trouble with prosthetic fitting.
We have initiated the use of COX-2 selective NSAIDs on all patients,
unless contraindicated, for both prophylaxis and treatment of HO. Our
experience had shown that in this patient population, signs of secondary
complications such as DVT or HO, are typically very subtle and may first
present with only mild low-grade fever, therefore medical vigilance is
imperative. Because of the high incidence of comorbid head injury, it is
important that the medical staff have experience in managing patients
with cognitive deficits. For posttraumatic seizure prophylaxis and
treatment, we have found levetiracetam very effective. Finally, because
of the high incidence of multi-trauma and blood loss, combat amputees
have benefited from the use of Epoetin to stimulate red blood cell
production. This treatment not only helps healing but also promotes more
energy during rehabilitation.
Surgical Considerations:
Standardizing surgical approaches to amputation is challenging,
especially for combat casualties whose wounds are not only extensive but
also are contaminated with dirt, bacteria, and shrapnel. Most require
comanagement by multiple surgical subspecialties (orthopedics, vascular,
plastics, neurosurgery); therefore good communication between these
services is essential. Limb-salvage decisions remain complex and should
be made in conjunction with the patient, as well as the entire medical
and rehabilitation team. Tools such as the Mangled Extremity Severity
Score (MESS) are helpful in facilitating these decisions. In addition to
anatomic and physiologic factors, one should not lose sight of
anticipated functional outcome, especially for this generally young and
active patient population, who are eager to return to high level
sporting activities. Similar considerations must be made when deciding
on amputation length and level. It is critical that the rehabilitation
team, especially the Prosthetist, be involved in these decisions
preoperatively to ensure optimal length for prosthetic fitting and
function.
Advances in Prosthetics:
It is our belief that the technological advances in prosthetic design
and fit not only significantly improve patient satisfaction and
function, but also facilitate progression in rehabilitation.
• Upper Extremity Amputees:
Because of the complex nature of combat wounds, prosthetic fitting is
often delayed to allow time for graft healing. Comorbid fractures, nerve
plexus injuries, or soft tissue defects often prohibit the use of body
powered prostheses and suspension harnesses or cables. During the
immediate postoperative period, we focus our attention on identifying
myoelectric control sites.
Occupational therapists work closely with the patients using electronic
sensors over remaining intact muscles. These sensors capture
electromyographic (EMG) signals that trigger audio and video feedback to
the patient and therapist. These signals are also used to operate video
games, which creates a friendly and therapeutic competitive environment
for the patients and leads to quick mastering of certain skills. Once
these skills are acquired, patients progress rapidly to operating
myoelectric prostheses as soon as their limb is cleared for fitting.
Body-powered prostheses are introduced later, as their comorbid injuries
permit. Advanced prosthetic components such as the Utah Arm 3TM allow
simultaneous operation and control of the elbow and terminal device. The
addition of a wrist control unit allows more useful upper extremity
functioning. While the SensorHand TM SPEED allows a faster and more
responsive opening and closing terminal device, as well as the ability
to maintain constant grip force, because of built-in sensors within the
fingertips. These sensors provide feedback to a microprocessor, which
automatically tightens the grip to prevent objects from slipping out of
the hand.
• Lower-Limb Amputees:
We have found that the Computer Aided Design and Manufacture (CAD/CAM)
equipment has significantly improved our ability to provide prostheses
for traumatic lower-limb amputees. The computerized system allows the
fabrication of a custom-made socket in a fraction of the time needed for
traditional casting. The shorter fabrication time is especially helpful
in caring for the combat amputee, whose residual limbs have complex scar
and suture lines and experience significant rapid volume changes. We
have also found that advances in lower-limb prosthetic components, such
as microprocessor knees and dynamic response feet, not only enhance
function but also promote a more rapid progression through
rehabilitation.
The ability to program microprocessor knees to provide more or less
stance and/or swing control assists advancement from early
weight-bearing to initial ambulation and, eventually, to stair and
obstacle negotiation, without having to change prosthetic components or
alignment. We have also found that during initial ambulation, patients
perform well with multiaxial feet and vertical compression pylons,
however, as their confidence and activities increase they perform better
with lighter-weight feet that have vertical compression features built
into the keel of the foot itself. Our 3-D motion analysis gait
laboratory provides useful functional measures during the early phases
of fitting to aid with prosthetic alignment and choice of components, as
well as feedback to the patients and therapists on specific items to
work on during therapy sessions.
The Role of Graduate Medical Education (GME):
Experience throughout OEF/OIF has demonstrated the critical impact that
GME has had in providing the finest care to those wounded in combat.
Ongoing educational programs that include military-unique curriculum
help military facilities stay current with state of the art medicine,
surgical and rehabilitation approaches to care. Of note, WRAMC operates
the only PM&R Residency Program in the Department of Defense (DoD). This
has greatly enhanced incorporating fundamental rehabilitation principles
to the care of the combat amputee. Lastly the presence of a vital and
active research program at WRAMC has helped to bring cutting-edge
interventions to this group of patients.
Peer & Psycho-Social Support Programs:
An extremely important aspect of a comprehensive program includes
professional psychological and amputee peer support. We have formed
partnerships with the VA and Amputee Coalition of America (ACA) to find
and train outstanding individuals who volunteer their time to support
combat casualties returning from war. It is ideal if these volunteers
have military experience. They not only provide emotional support but
also provide valuable feedback to the rehabilitation team as to how a
patient is progressing both physically and emotionally. In addition they
are helpful in facilitating guidance through the military medical
disability system. Events such a the National Disabled Veterans Winter
Sports Clinic (sponsored by the VA) and those sponsored by the ACA,
Disabled Sports U.S.A., and numerous other private and public
organizations help to introduce patients to the variety of sports and
recreational activities available for individuals with disabilities.
Support to family members is an equally important aspect of the program.
WRAMC successfully established a Family Assistance Center (FAC) within
the hospital to meet this need. Social workers and nurse case managers
are critical members of the team, coordinating continued care, discharge
planning, equipment purchases, etc.
Military Medical Disability System:
Navigation through the military medical disability system is
complicated. A single amputee service promotes communication and
standardization. Physicians have to be well educated and experienced in
writing medical evaluation boards. In addition, a Physical Evaluation
Board Liaison Office (PEBLO) counselor should be assigned to each
patient during his or her inpatient stay. VA counselors are also
necessary to ensure each patient is aware of his or her eligible
benefits. Educational programs need to be tailored to the soldiers'
needs, especially those with head injury, hearing or vision loss.
Optimal disposition of patients is often complicated by the frequent
geographical challenges created when the patient’s duty station, home of
record, and nearest military or VA medical facility are not located near
each other. In these situations, medical follow-up must be coordinated
through the TRICARE military healthcare system. Unfortunately standards
and availability of health care services vary in both the private and
public sectors across the United States. Through partnerships between
the DoD and the VA, WRAMC is hopeful to be able to continue and follow
these combat amputees in order to ensure the best long-term care.
Conclusion:
Over the past decade, a cultural shift has occurred within the military,
giving individuals with limb-loss the opportunity to stay on active-duty
service. Advances in medical, surgical and rehabilitative care, as well
as prosthetic design, should help individuals achieve this goal. Whether
or not the soldier desires, or has the ability, to remain on active duty
service, WRAMC is committed to helping all combat amputees reach their
maximal function and return to the highest possible quality of life.
|