Opening Statement of Chairman
Chris Smith (NJ-4)
Department of Veterans Affairs FY
2005 Budget
February 4, 2004
This committee has always taken a serious approach to its responsibility
to recommend necessary funding levels for veterans benefits and
services. However, controversy over matters having nothing to do with
veterans funding resulted in unfortunate delays in the normal funding
process. Fiscal year 2004 began more than four months ago, but the
Department of Veterans Affairs is only now able to move forward and
provide the services which we provided funding for last October.
In January, the President signed into law an appropriation measure that
increased funding for veterans medical care by $2.5 billion over the
previous year, a 10 percent increase. A year earlier, he also signed a
measure which belatedly increased funding by $2.6 billion for fiscal
year 2003. While all of us regret the delay in providing these funds,
the bottom line is that more veterans will have access to vital health
care services.
An estimated 74 percent of living veterans have used one or more of the
programs which a grateful Nation has provided for them. Some think that
it’s time to reign in spending on veterans programs, that we’re already
doing enough for veterans. I disagree with them, because I understand
how much these programs have done to make our country what it is today.
Let’s look at what this country might be like if some current veterans
programs had not been authorized and adequately funded.
The coffers of this country would be substantially leaner because
veterans would not have achieved the level of income that the GI Bill
enabled them to earn. The middle class in America would be much
smaller, and the number of persons enrolled in colleges and universities
would be less than half of what it is today. The housing stock in
this country would be older, and several million houses would not
exist. Many veterans would have died prematurely or would be
experiencing debilitating illness. Our medical profession would be
less skilled, and life-saving inventions and medicines would not be
available. The cost of Medicare and other government-sponsored health
programs would be tens of billions of dollars higher than they are
today.
This nation has a long history of taking care of veterans when they
return from serving their country. Laws providing benefits for veterans
were some of the first laws enacted by the 1st Congress. We continue
that tradition today not only because veterans deserve the gratitude of
the nation they served, but because it makes our Nation stronger and
safer.
It is evident that this Congress and this Administration have embraced
the cause of veterans. Just look at the legislation signed into law in
the last three years:
·
We’ve increased the GI Bill
education program by 46 percent.
·
We’ve authorized more
generous health care and pension benefits for the surviving spouses of
those who die of a service-related cause.
·
We’ve enacted a
comprehensive array of authorities designed to end chronic homelessness
among veterans.
·
We’ve authorized concurrent
receipt of VA disability compensation and military retirement for almost
250,000 veterans.
·
We’ve set in motion the
largest National Cemetery expansion since this program was established
during the Civil War.
·
Thanks to the 30 percent
funding increase signed into law during the past three years, over one
million more veterans are using the VA health care system.
In addition to these major legislative initiatives, which could not have
been accomplished unless we worked in a bipartisan manner, we’ve seen
services to veterans become more accessible and timely. This is a good
record to build on.
Mr. Secretary, I have heard you quote the late Oliver Wendell Holmes, so
let me refer you to one of his best-known quotations. The great thing
in this world is not so much where you stand, as in what direction you
are moving.
The budget for veterans benefits and services unveiled on Monday is
moving in the right direction. This budget requests almost $64.9
billion in appropriations for veterans benefits and services. And while
it certainly doesn’t contain all of the funding that advocates will
seek, it does request about 96 or 97 percent of what’s needed.
In addition, there are several laudable proposals to reduce the
financial burden of VA health care for former prisoners of war,
terminally ill and low-income veterans. We welcome these proposals and
the request for funds to pay for them. As in past years, this budget
doesn’t cover the cost of all the health care which veterans are seeking
from VA nor account for any growth in that demand. Thus, Congress will
have to add funds in the budget process, something we have done in four
of the past five years. Our work begins today. In addition to the
Secretary, we have the Veterans Independent Budget to help guide us, and
as in past years, it sets an ambitious goal for the Congress. I look
forward to hearing from the Secretary and all of our witnesses.
|