STATEMENT OF
CATHLEEN WIBLEMO, DEPUTY DIRECTOR
VETERANS AFFAIRS AND REHABILITATION DIVISION
THE AMERICAN LEGION
APRIL 29, 2004
Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee:
Thank you for this opportunity to present The American Legion’s view on
the many issues being considered by the Subcommittee today. The American
Legion commends the Subcommittee for holding a hearing to discuss these
important and timely issues.
HR 348, “ The Prisoner of War Benefits Act of 2003”
This bill would amend Title 38, United States Codes, to repeal the
minimum period of time an individual must have been held or interned –
not less than thirty days – for entitlement to the presumption of
service connection for certain prisoner-of-war diseases, under Title 38,
United States Code, Section 1112(b), and the presumption of service
connection for dental care, under Title 38, United States Code, Section
1712(a)(1)(F). This bill would also expand the list of prisoner-of-war
diseases presumed to be service connected currently set forth in Title
38, United States Code, Section 1112(b) to include: (16) heart disease,
(17) stroke, (18) liver disease, (19) diabetes (type 2), and (20)
osteoporosis. In addition, it would authorize the Secretary to issue
regulations establishing presumptive service connection for any disease
found to have a positive association with veterans’ prisoner-of-war
experience.
The issue of the welfare and well being of those veterans who have
endured the hardship and trauma of being held as a prisoner-of-war has
long been one of major concerns of The American Legion. To ensure that
the government of the United States fulfills its obligation to these
brave men and women, The American Legion has actively supported
improvements in benefits provided to these individuals and their
survivors and are pleased to support the proposed addition of these five
diseases to the list of those currently presumed to be service
connected. It is hoped this legislation will provide the impetus for
action to further broaden the list of presumptive diseases and
disabilities, which former prisoners-of-war are known to suffer from.
Toward this end, we are encouraged that the bill recognizes and
emphasizes the important role played by VA’s Advisory Committee on
Former Prisoners-of-War. This group of esteemed individuals, many of
whom are themselves former prisoners-of-war, provide the necessary
mechanism and forum to evaluate scientific and medical studies on former
prisoners-of-war and make appropriate recommendations to the Secretary
regarding needed changes in VA’s outreach, benefits, and medical care
program for this community of veterans.
However, based on the longstanding mandate of the members of The
American Legion, we continue to advocate the inclusion of chronic
pulmonary disease, where there was a history of forced labor in mines
during internment and generalized osteoarthritis, as differentiated from
the currently listed disability of “post-traumatic arthritis”.
HR 843, “The Injured Veterans Benefits Eligibility Act of 2003”
This bill would amend Title 38, United States Code, Section 1151, to
provide for full service-connected disability benefits and services to
veterans disabled as a result of VA treatment or an approved program of
vocational rehabilitation or training and death benefits for their
survivors.
Currently, Title 38, United States Code, Section 1151, provides that VA
disability compensation and Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC)
will be payable for a qualifying additional disability or death “as if”
it were service-connected. Such qualifying disability or death must be
found to have been caused by VA hospital care, medical or surgical
treatment or examination, either by a VA employee or in a VA facility,
and the proximate cause of the disability or death was carelessness,
negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment, or similar instance
of fault on the part of the VA or the event was not reasonably
foreseeable.
VA General Counsel held in a Precedent Opinion of July 3, 1997 that
benefits paid under Section 1151 do not extend entitlement to benefits
other than monetary compensation for the disability, such as specially
adapted housing, automobile and adaptive equipment allowance, or
education and medical care. It concluded that the statutes are
unambiguous and that Congress intended to limit the entitlement under
Section 1151 to disability compensation, clothing allowance, and paired
organ compensation, rather than all veterans’ monetary benefits and
services.
The American Legion believes Section 1151 should be interpreted broadly,
rather than narrowly as it relates to entitlement to additional
benefits. The intent of the term “as if service-connected” connotes that
the additional disability was incurred outside of military service and
could not, therefore, be “service connected” under the traditional
criteria of Title 38, United States Code, Section 1110. It also codifies
the federal government’s responsibility to provide compensation to the
disabled individual or their survivors in the same manner and, we
believe, to the same extent as other veterans who were disabled or died
as a result of military service. Since this legislation would eliminate
any question regarding Congressional intent as to the extent of
entitlement to VA benefits authorized under Title 38, United States
Code, Section 1151, The American Legion offers no objection to this
bill.
H.R. 1735: “To amend Title 38, United States Code, to increase the
maximum amount of a home loan guarantee available to a veteran.”
This bill would amend Title 38, United States Code, to increase the
maximum home loan guarantee from the current $60,000 to $81,000. For
reasons discussed below, this would make the VA loan maximum available
to veterans $324,000, a considerable improvement over the current
$240,000.
H.R. 4065: “The Veterans Housing Affordability Act of 2004”
This bill would amend Title 38, United States Code, to increase the
maximum amount of home loan guarantee, and to provide for annual
adjustments for such amounts. H.R. 4065 would set the maximum guarantee
at 22.5 percent of the current year Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation (Freddie Mac) single-family home loan purchase limit.
Effective January 1, 2004, that limit is $333,700 so the VA guarantee
would be $75,082, thus qualifying, again for reasons discussed below, an
eligible veteran for a $300,328 mortgage. This bill has the added
benefit of annual indexing of the maximum amount of home loan guarantee
to the current year Freddie Mac loan purchase limit, eliminating the
need for periodic legislative increases.
The American Legion has recognized for years that VA home loan guarantee
limits have been inadequate and either of these bills would make home
ownership a reality for more veterans than ever. Basic entitlement
currently is $36,000 and up to $60,000 for certain loans over $144,000.
Basic entitlement qualifies a veteran for a mortgage of $144,000; the
current maximum would qualify a veteran for a $240,000 loan. Only homes
in the Midwest, where the median price of a home is $141,000, easily
qualify for VA basic guarantee, according to statistics from the
National Association of REALTORS’® Median Sales Price of Existing Single
Family Homes for Metropolitan Areas (© 2004, National Association of
REALTORS). Lenders will generally lend up to 4 times of a veteran’s
available guarantee entitlement without requiring a down payment,
provided income levels and credit qualify and the property appraises for
the asking price. There is no “maximum” VA loan, but lenders currently
limit VA loans to $240,000, a factor of 4 on the guarantee amount,
because lenders resell VA loans in the VA/FHA Government National
Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae) secondary market, which currently
requires a 25 percent down payment or guarantee on loans.
The American Legion believes that higher limits should be established
for VA home loans to stay current with increasing housing costs
nationwide. For example, in San Francisco, California in the last
quarter of 2003, the median price of a home was $574,300, an increase of
11.2 percent over 2002. For the same period, in Boston, Massachusetts
the median price of a home was $406,000 up 5.3 percent; in the New York
City Metro area, $353,000, up 10.2 percent; and here in Washington D.C.
area the median home cost $292,100, a 12.9 percent increase over 2002.
(Id.) In these cities, where half of the existing homes sales were for
prices ABOVE the median, the difference between many veterans being able
to secure financing for a decent home for his or her family and being
shut out of the market is due to the currently inadequate levels of VA
home loan guarantee. Either of these bills would benefit veterans in the
D.C. market; H.R. 4065 would bring the VA guarantee just slightly above
the median home price and H.R. 1735 would well exceed it. Not so in the
other three high-priced markets as well as other areas in Southern
California and Connecticut. It is noted that Freddie Mac single-family
home loan purchase limits may be increased by up to 50% for home loans
in Hawaii, Alaska, Guam and the U.S. Virgin Islands and it is presumed
that these increases would also apply to H.R. 4065, were it enacted.
Similar exceptions should be made for these few high cost metropolitan
areas. If VA guarantee is to be used in lieu of down payments, The
American Legion believes otherwise credit-worthy veterans should not be
shut out of these markets because of inadequate VA home loan guarantee.
Either of these bills will achieve the objective stated by National
Commander John A. Brieden, III in his testimony on September 16, 2003 to
a joint session of the House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committees
that the VA Home Loan Guarantee of $240,000 should be raised to
$300,000. The American Legion applauds the author and co-sponsors of
H.R. 4065 for including a provision that will relieve the Congress of
the administrative chore of periodically raising the guarantee limit
while keeping VA current and competitive in mortgage markets.
HR 2612: “The Veterans Adapted Housing Expansion Act of 2003”
This bill would extend entitlement to special adapted housing
assistance, under Title 38, United States Code, Section 2101(a)(2)(D),
to those veterans whose service connected disabilities are rated
permanent and totally disabling due to the anatomical loss or loss of
use of both upper extremities such as to preclude the use of the arms at
and below the elbows.
Clearly, veterans who have suffered the loss or loss of use of both
upper extremities are very seriously disabled. Their type of severe
disability is, for all practical purposes, in the same category as those
disabilities currently enumerated in Title 38, United States Code,
Section 2101. They obviously have a very difficult time performing
normal day-to-day activities in and around their place of residence. The
American Legion believes the type of assistance that would be made
available under this legislation to those veterans so disabled will help
improve their overall quality of life and we are pleased to support HR
2612.
HR 3936: “To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the
principal office of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans
Claims to be at any location in the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area”
This bill would authorize the relocation of the United States Court of
Appeals for Veterans Claims to a dedicated Veterans Court House and
Justice Center to house the Court at a location in the greater
Washington, DC metropolitan area, preferably in the area of the
Pentagon. While The American Legion has no formal position on this
matter, we would offer no objection to this legislation.
“ The Veterans Educational Opportunity Act of 2004”
Aimed primarily at new military retirees, this legislation would allow
the veteran who entered active duty on or before July 1, 1985 served
honorably on continuous active duty through at least April, 1, 2004 and
meets certain educational prerequisites to make an “irrevocable
election” for entitlement to basic educational assistance under Chapter
30 of Title 38, United States Code, The All-Volunteer Force Educational
Assistance Program (Montgomery G.I. Bill or MGIB). The veteran must have
been eligible to enroll in the Post-Vietnam Era Veterans Educational
Assistance Program (VEAP) and may not have made a previous in-service
election to transfer eligibility from VEAP to MGIB. The veteran is
required to make a $3900.00 contribution to MGIB within 24 months of the
election, by direct payment to VA or by withholding from retired pay,
and any past contributions to VEAP may be refunded to the veteran.
Election to convert eligibility to MGIB from VEAP is a good investment
for the veteran. Under VEAP, the service member was required to
contribute a minimum of $2700 that the Department of Defense would match
on a $2 for $1 basis, plus “kickers”. While the service member could
contribute more, the basic contribution would give the veteran $300.00
per month for as long as the $11,700 fund lasted; about 39 months. Basic
MGIB pays a benefit of $985 per month for 36 months if the veteran
served at least three full years on continuous active duty for a total
benefit of $35,460.
The American Legion is pleased to support this legislation.
“A bill to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to contract for a
report on employment placement, retention and advancement of recently
separated veterans”
The report of this proposed two-year study of veterans released from
service since 1990 would determine: whether the employment obtained by
recently separated veterans is commensurate with training and education;
whether recently separated veterans are receiving VA or DoD/Selected
Reserve educational assistance, training or vocational rehabilitation;
and whether transition assistance programs helped service members obtain
civilian employment. The report would further analyze trends in hiring
of veterans in the private sector and identify veterans who have reached
senior level management positions. The study is to be funded from the
Compensation and Pension account and may not exceed $490,000 in cost.
The report results would be used to establish employment contact
networks, for outreach to private sector employers and facilitate
communication between recently discharged veterans and potential
employers.
The American Legion lauds the intent of this bill, but questions the
tasking of VA as the agency to contract for it. While The American
Legion has no official position, it would seem that the Veterans
Employment and Training Service (VETS) of the Department of Labor (DoL)
would be a more appropriate agency to carry out this study. VETS is
already responsible for a number of programs such as; the Uniformed
Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act, Job Counseling,
Training, and Placement Service for Veterans, the Jobs for Veterans Act,
Pub. L. 107-288 and a number of other programs. Further, The Bureau of
Labor Statistics, cited in the scope of work as a primary source of data
for the study, is also a DoL agency.
“A bill to codify certain additional diseases as establishing a
presumption of service connection when occurring in veterans exposed to
ionizing radiation during active military, naval or air service, and for
other purposes.
This legislation proposes the amendment of Title 38, United States Code,
Section 1112 to add to the list of presumed radiation-related diseases
cancers of the bone, brain, colon, lung, and ovary. The purpose of this
change is to eliminate the difference that currently exists between the
list of qualifying radiation-related diseases under Title 38, United
States Code, Section 1112, and the list of recognized radiation-related
diseases applicable to the Department of Justice’s “Radiation
Compensation Act of 1990” (RECA) as amended, under Title 42, United
States Code, Section 7384. In 2000, Pub. L. 106-398 expanded the number
of diseases on the RECA list. However, similar legislation to update
Title 38 was never developed. Since this difference may adversely affect
some atomic veterans or their survivors seeking benefits from VA,
legislative action is necessary to ensure these lists of qualifying
diseases remain comparable, so that eligible individuals can make a
decision which program may be most advantageous.
This legislation also proposes an amendment to the definition of
radiation-risk activities for presumptive service connection, as set
forth in Title 38, United States Code, Section 1112(c)(3) to include
veterans whose military duties would otherwise qualified them for
inclusion in the Special Exposure Cohort of the Energy Employees
Occupational Illness Program, under title 42, United States Code,
Section 7384. The definition of individuals to be included in Special
Exposure Cohort and the applicable criteria is detailed and extensive.
The American Legion has long advocated the expansion of the definition
of a radiation-risk activity in Title 38, United States Code, Section
1112. The current presumption is less than complete and clearly fails to
recognize and include the thousands of veterans whose military duties
were performed at various nuclear weapons development, testing, and
manufacturing facilities, such as Hanford, Washington. While there, they
were at risk of exposure not only to radiation, but also beryllium and
silica. However, in claims for VA disability compensation or DIC, since
the presumption of exposure does not apply, veterans are faced with the
very severe legal hurdle of obtaining official government records to
support their claim of exposure to radiation or other hazardous
material, which may be difficult if not impossible. This proposed
amendment would overcome the inequity that currently exists under Title
38 and make it easier for these atomic veterans or their survivors to
obtain the benefits to which they are rightfully entitled.
While The American Legion fully supports the draft bill, we would like
to recommend that consideration be given to amending it to specifically
add to the list of diseases covered under Title 38, United States Code,
Section 1112, chronic beryllium disease and chronic silicosis. These
diseases are currently among those covered under RECA. This change is
necessary to ensure the statute reflects all of the environmental
hazards associated with veterans’ participation in the nation’s nuclear
weapons program.
Finally, the draft bill provides that VA disability or DIC will be
offset by the amount of any benefits received under RECA. This offset,
however, does not otherwise affect their basic VA entitlement. Such
offset provision is similar to that which applies to a settlement under
Title 38, United States Code, Section 1151.
Mr. Chairman, thank you again for the opportunity to present the views
of the 2.8 million members of The American Legion. We look forward to
working with this Subcommittee to ensure that America’s veterans receive
the entitlements they have earned through their service to this great
country.
|