Statement of
Dr. Mary Sano
Associate Chief of Staff for Research
VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY
April 28, 2004
Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee:
Though new to VA, I have been a researcher in Alzheimer’s disease (AD)
for nearly 20 years, with a primary interest in developing strategies
for the treatment and prevention of the disease. Currently, I am
directing a multi-center clinical trial to determine if lipid-lowering
drugs slow the progression of AD. This is run with a consortium of
Alzheimer’s Centers around the country, and includes several other VA
sites.
One of the first observations to support the idea that the use of
cholesterol lowering drugs could have benefits in this population was
made by Dr. Benjamin Wolazin, a physician at the Edward Hines VA Medical
Center (VAMC) in Hines Illinois. Through record review, he determined
that the prescriptive use of certain drugs known as “statins” was
associated with lower risk of AD. While observational studies only give
a hint about potential benefits, we are now conducting a rigorous
randomized trial that is designed to determine if one of these agents
will slow disease progressing in patients with mild to moderate AD.
The Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, located at the Bronx VAMC and
at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York City, which I direct,
provides an infrastructure to use state of the art clinical assessment
of patients and to offer patients the opportunity to participate in
cutting edge research. One of the most valuable resources at our medical
center is the brain bank for AD and other cognitive disorders. This
resource permits us to conduct clinical-neuropathological correlations
to determine the changes that occur in the brain with aging and disease.
Because of the careful clinical diagnosis with electronic record keeping
at VAMCs, we are able to maximize the very generous contribution of our
volunteers to compare detailed information from their medical records
with subtle and microscopic changes at the cellular level to get a
clearer picture of the biology of AD. This resource has led to an
important observation about cell loss. We know that AD is associated
with neurofibrillary plaques and tangles. From these studies we can
surmise the areas of the brain that appear to deteriorate first. For
example, the areas known as the entorhinal cortex and the hippocampus
appear to deteriorate first. These brain areas are involved with memory
and learning, and we now know that serious impairments in memory may
predict AD several years before the disease can be diagnosed. We also
know there is definite loss of neurons in AD, but in healthy eldery
individuals and in very mild cases, there are apparently normal neurons
that undergo the initial stages of tangle formation. Furthermore, the
loss of neurons is limited, compared to AD cases. This is important
because it suggests that we may be able to “rescue” neurons at this mild
stage and therefore we may focus our attention to treatments at this
early stage.
VA has a long history of research in AD. The very first multi-center
study for an approved treatment for AD was published in the New England
Journal of Medicine under the leadership of a VA physician, Dr. Kenneth
Davis, the former Chief of Psychiatry at the Bronx VAMC. This work made
a long-standing contribution in that it provided the methodology for
conducting multi-center studies for testing new treatments for AD. That
methodology is still used today. In particular, the very test used to
determine drug efficacy in dementia in nearly all pivotal studies is the
Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS), which was developed at the
Bronx VAMC. Though this test was published nearly two decades ago, it
remains the most commonly used assessment in clinical trials for AD in
the U.S. and around the world.
Many renowned VA AD research colleagues, who have been in the field for
years, have made important contributions. From “bench to bedside” is the
challenge for VA research, and it is met in the research of Mark
Tuszynski, MD, PhD, (San Diego VA Medical Center), through his
pioneering work examining fibroblasts and, more recently, other types of
cells. These cells have been transduced to express genes for growth
factors such as nerve growth factor (NGF), and then transplanted into
the brain. This work started about a decade ago with funding from VA and
has proceeded to show that grafts could reverse memory deficits
resulting from lesions associated with AD pathology. This work
subsequently advanced to studies in monkeys, and, two years ago, to the
first clinical trial of gene therapy in patients with AD, who are
transplanted with their own fibroblasts, which have been transduced to
produce NGF. Much of the preliminary work is attributed to the published
work of Dr. Tuszynski, and this interventional approach provides great
hope for effective treatment.
While finding cures and preventions are important, even our best efforts
will leave many with AD. VA researchers have done cutting edge research
to define and maximize patient independence and comfort. To that end, VA
researchers have described the standards of determining “decision
making” capacity in patients with AD. The rigorous research conducted
lays the foundation for determining the best way to evaluate patient
ability to participate in clinical and research decisions.
A report of the National Ethics Committee of the Veterans Health
Administration (lead author: Dr. Ladislav Volicer, Edith Nourse Rogers
Memorial VAMC, Bedford Massachusetts) summarizes the empirical data on
the important role of families in making decisions for patients with
impaired capacity. The report found that even when asked prior to the
onset of any limitations due to illness, patients prefer that a family
member make decisions for them, and often prefer this to advanced
directives. Therefore, an important conclusion from this report is that
we need to make decisions that truly meet patients’ needs and desires.
The report also contains specific recommendations for the advance proxy
planning process.
In summary, the success of AD research in VA is the result of a series
of partnerships. These partnerships begin with the generous spirit of
the veterans who volunteer to participate in VA clinical research. They
include the melding of clinical resources, such as the electronic
medical record system and centralized databases, with the outstanding
curiosity of VA researchers, and would not be possible without the
research resources to make the best use of the scientific opportunity
and the commitment to deliver the best of care.
|