|
STATEMENT
OF
BLAKE ORTNER, ASSOCIATE LEGISLATIVE DIRECTOR
PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA
BEFORE THE
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS
SUBCOMMITTEE ON BENEFITS
ON H.R. 1460, THE VETERANS ENTREPRENEURSHIP ACT OF 2003,
H.R. 1712 , THE VETERANS FEDERAL PROCUREMENT OPPORTUNITY
ACT OF 2003, AND H.R. 1716, THE VETERANS EARN AND LEARN ACT
APRIL 30, 2003
Chairman Brown, Ranking Member Michaud, members of the
Subcommittee, Paralyzed Veterans of America (PVA) is pleased to present
our views on the three pieces of legislation before you today, H.R.
1460, the “Veterans Entrepreneurship Act of 2003”, H.R. 1712 , the
“Veterans Federal Procurement Opportunity Act of 2003”, and H.R. 1716,
the ”Veterans Earn and Learn Act.” PVA thanks you, Mr. Chairman for
addressing the serious challenges facing veteran entrepreneurs and those
seeking to pursue additional education and training.
PVA is the only national veterans’ service organization,
chartered by Congress to represent and advocate on behalf of our members
and all Americans with spinal cord injury or disease. All of PVA's
members, in each of the fifty states and Puerto Rico, are veterans with
spinal cord injury or dysfunction. These veterans suffer from
catastrophic injury and disease and face challenges every day in their
quest to survive and function fully in society.
H.R. 1460, the
Veterans Entrepreneurship Act of 2003
Paralyzed Veterans of America thanks Mr. Renzi for
introducing H.R. 1460. Entrepreneurship training is an incredibly
valuable process for veterans, especially disabled veterans, as they
reenter civilian society. This is especially true for those with
catastrophic disabilities who often have difficulty and face multiple
challenges in the normal workplace. Though the Americans With
Disabilities Act lowered many barriers and opened doors to those with
disabilities, many of these barriers still remain. The opportunity to
gain training that will make our disabled veterans self-employable will
truly help individuals that have already proven that they have the
drive, determination and willingness to do more and succeed during
military service. Allowing these same individuals to use the many
talents developed during military service through entrepreneurship
training will bring benefits to themselves and to America through
increased individual and small business taxes. It is a win for
everyone.
PVA is also glad to see the legislation pursue
non-traditional sources of training programs such as the National
Veterans Business Development Corporation while at the same time
maintaining sufficient definitions to preclude entities not able to
deliver on their program promises.
The Veterans Entrepreneurship Act of 2003 also provides
for procurement improvements that will allow new small businesses owned
by service-disabled veterans to gain access to government contracts.
Perhaps the most difficult time for a small business is at its
beginning. Allowing sole source contracts to service-disabled
veteran-owned businesses will give them the jump start needed to develop
their business. This opportunity is not a hand-out and is only
available to those businesses that can successfully provide the
contracted services and provide them at a fair and reasonable price.
But these provisions will only be successful if contracting officers are
encouraged to provide contracts to service-disabled veteran-owned
businesses at the goal provided for in P.L. 106-50, the “Veterans
Entrepreneurship and Small Business Development Act of 1999.” To date
the performance of federal agencies has been dismal. We ask the support
of this subcommittee to provide encouragement through legislation that
these contracting officers need to support our veterans. The provisions
provided by H.R. 1712, the Veterans Federal Procurement Opportunity Act
should help.
H.R. 1712 , the
Veterans Federal Procurement Opportunity Act of 2003
Mr. Chairman, we would like to offer our special thanks
to House Veterans Affairs Committee Ranking Member Evans for introducing
H.R. 1712, the Veterans Federal Procurement Opportunity Act. As I have
stated above, the introduction of legislation to support our disabled
veterans business owners is welcomed, but if there is no requirement to
provide contracts to these businesses, then it is simply an empty
gesture, albeit with good intentions. H.R. 1712 puts some teeth behind
the rhetoric. PVA fully supports this legislation and would like to
highlight some key provisions and concerns.
PVA particularly welcomes the modification of the Small
Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 et seq.) identified in Section 2 of the
legislation which excludes amounts received for a veterans
service-connected disability when determining whether a veteran is
economically disadvantaged.
PVA also welcomes Section 3, the Reauthorization of
Programs of the National Veterans Business Development Corporation. We
are encouraged by the continuing support for the veterans corporation by
the subcommittee. However, in appropriating funds for the corporation,
we would ask that the appropriation for FY 2005 and 2006 be earmarked
for programs developed by the corporation. This funding could
especially support the Community Based Outreach Programs and the
Educational Training Programs. Earmarking the funding would directly
benefit the programs provided by the corporation and encourage the
corporation’s own self-sufficiency as envisioned by P.L. 106-50. PVA
fully supports the Veterans Corporation, but also looks forward to it
becoming the self-sustaining private corporation envisioned in Section
202 of P.L. 106-50. This would benefit the corporation as well as the
veterans they endeavor to assist. PVA also would ask the subcommittee
to carefully consider the reporting criteria placed on the corporation
to insure that resources that should be used to help veteran business
owners do not need to be directed into administrative overhead. We
welcome the oversight of the corporation, but in the rapidly changing
business environment, goals or plans for 5 years in the future may serve
only as general guides that can lose their meaning shortly after being
created.
PVA greatly welcomes the requirements for specific
procurement goals for veterans businesses. In addition, the prohibition
against “double counting” is a welcome provision. Though the double
counting may benefit some classes of veterans and provide an easy method
for a contracting officer to meet his agencies goals, it is deceptive
and does not give a clear picture of procurement for an agency. In
addition, PVA applauds language requiring a restriction on the use of
funds for agencies that do not meet their goal. The only way to force
agencies to meet their obligations to veterans is with an enforcement
mechanism. The goals placed on agencies have been failures.
Procurement officers have provided numerous excuses and justifications
for their lack of responsiveness. Unless a stronger requirement is
mandated, these contracting officers will continue to ignore the intent
of Congress. PVA welcomes the inclusion of penalties for material
breach of the legislation for those who would attempt to violate this
act.
H.R. 1716, the
Veterans Earn and Learn Act
PVA would like to thank House Veterans Affairs Committee
Chairman Smith for his forward thinking legislation. The idea of a
lump-sum payment of benefits for those who complete training programs
early only makes good sense. The ability to encourage veterans to move
on to gainful employment benefits both the veteran and society. The
faster the veteran can begin to earn an income and pay taxes, the faster
that veteran’s self-esteem and confidence will be increased. In
addition, the lump-sum payment will provide funds to become established
if the veteran needs to relocate to find higher paying jobs in his new
discipline. PVA also welcomes the recommendation for the Secretary to
increase the use of apprenticeships. Though we do not want to remove
the opportunities for those who wish to pursue educational programs, for
many veterans this may not be the best pursuit for them. Apprenticeship
programs can more quickly return veterans to the workforce, often at
professional jobs providing a higher initial income and living wage.
This is particularly important with today’s veterans who are often older
and have families.
PVA also applauds provisions for the pilot program
identified in Section 6 to provide on-job benefits to train Department
of Veterans Affairs’ claims adjudicators. Increasing the limit for
on-the-job training to 3 years for claims adjudicators may allow the
Secretary to increase the number of adjudicators and help reduce the
unacceptable backlog of claims currently facing VA.
PVA also welcomes provisions of Section 7 to share
information among the Departments of Veterans Affairs, Defense and Labor
with respect to on-job training. It is illogical that veterans
departing military service are unable to immediately pursue employment
in fields which they trained during military service. PVA understands
the needs for states and private organizations to regulate professional
activities in their jurisdictions. But it simply doesn’t make sense
that veterans trained as professionals must be retrained to meet
bureaucratic paperwork requirements. We hope that the Departments will
work closely with the Professional Certification Advisory Board to
insure that our veterans face as few impediments to gainful employment
as possible to speed their reintegration into the civilian workforce.
Veterans face many challenges as they leave military
service. They have lost time to their peers who chose not to serve
America. We must do whatever we can to allow them to catch up, whether
it is in training, apprenticeship programs or small business
opportunities. Those with disabilities face even greater challenges in
both employment and often in daily living. Congress must do all they
can to provide for these veterans who have sacrificed for this nation.
With the current threat of budget cuts aimed at veterans, PVA hopes that
the Subcommittee will convince your colleagues that veterans have
already made sacrifices and should not subsequently have their benefits
sacrificed for other programs or priorities. We thank those members of
Congress who are supporting legislation providing methods and techniques
to open new avenues for veterans and disabled veterans’ employment and
business opportunities. PVA knows that there will again be obstacles
placed in the way of this legislation. PVA fully supports you and will
provide whatever support to help pass these valuable benefits for our
nation’s veterans and our citizens with disabilities.
Mr. Chairman, I thank you and the Subcommittee for its
efforts to provide for our veterans. I would be happy to answer any
questions that you might have.
Information Required by Rule XI
2(g)(4) of the House of Representatives
Pursuant
to Rule XI 2(g)(4) of the House of Representatives, the following
information is provided regarding federal grants and contracts.
Fiscal Year
2002
Court of
Appeals for Veterans Claims, administered by the Legal Services
Corporation—National Veterans Legal Services Program—$179,000
(estimated).
Fiscal Year
2001
Court of
Appeals for Veterans Claims, administered by the Legal Services
Corporation—National Veterans Legal Services Program—$242,000.
Fiscal Year
2000
General
Services Administration—Preparation and presentation of seminars
regarding implementation of the Americans With Disabilities Act, 42
U.S.C. §12101, and requirements of the Uniform Federal Accessibility
Standards—$30,000.
Federal
Aviation Administration—Accessibility
consultation--$12,500.
Court of
Appeals for Veterans Claims, administered by the Legal Services
Corporation—National Veterans Legal Services Program—$200,000.
BIOGRAPHY OF BLAKE C.
ORTNER
Blake Ortner is an Associate Legislative Director for Paralyzed Veterans
of America representing PVA to federal agencies including the Department
of Labor, Office of Personnel Management, Department of Defense, HUD and
the VA. In addition, he is PVA’s representative on issues such as Gulf
War Illness, homeless veterans and coordinates issues with other Veteran
Service Organizations. He also often serves on special projects such as
disability advisor for the dedication ceremonies of the Korean War
Veterans Memorial.
He has served as the Chair for the Subcommittee on
Disabled Veterans (SODV) of the President’s Committee on the Employment
of People with Disabilities (PCEPD) and as a member of the Department of
Labor’s Advisory Committee on Veterans’ Employment and Training (VETS)
and the Veterans Organizations Homeless Council (VOHC).
A native of Moorhead, Minnesota, he attended the
University of Minnesota in Minneapolis on an Army Reserve Officer
Training Corps (ROTC) scholarship, graduating in 1983 with an
International Relations degree. He was commissioned as a Regular Army
Infantry second lieutenant stationed at Ft. Lewis, WA. Following
service with the 9th Infantry Division, he became a member of
the Army's Special Operations elite 2nd Ranger Battalion.
He continues his military service as the battalion
commander of 3-116th IN, Virginia Army National Guard and
returned in April 2002 from a 9-month deployment as part of the SFOR 10
peacekeeping mission to Bosnia-Herzegovina.
Mr. Ortner resides in Stafford, VA and is married with
two children.
|