|
STATEMENT
of
G. Allan Kingston
President and Chief
Executive Officer
Century Housing, a
nonprofit corporation
before the
United States House of
Representatives
Committee on Veterans’
Affairs
September 12, 2002
Mr. Chairman and Members
of the Committee:
My name is G. Allan
Kingston. I am the President and CEO of Century Housing Corporation, a
nonprofit company serving the Los Angeles metropolitan area. I am a
veteran, having served in the United States Navy for 13 years combined
active and reserve duty. I am joined today by my colleague, Robert J.
Norris, Jr., Executive Vice President of Century Housing and a United
States Marine Corps Vietnam Veteran, who currently serves as a Board
Member of the National Coalition for Homeless Veterans.
Thank you for this
opportunity to speak to you about how the Department of Veterans Affairs
can help to create more transitional housing for homeless veterans.
Speaking as a veteran
myself, I have long been frustrated by our nation’s inability to deal
with and make significant progress in providing opportunities for
homeless veterans so that they might fully participate in all of the
rights and responsibilities of citizenship. It is obvious that housing
is a critical starting point for recovery in each homeless veteran’s
search for a better way of life.
In the Los Angeles
area, we at Century Housing have spent the last 20 years providing
affordable housing opportunities for families and individuals of all
incomes. More than 15,000 low-income families and individuals have been
assisted by Century’s financing the development of some 10,000 units of
affordable housing, in 40 different communities in southern California.
In doing this, Century Housing has invested more than $500 million in
funding into these mostly low-income communities.
Through Century Housing’s
primary mission of linking affordable housing with social services we
call “More Than Shelter®,” we have helped to create
affordable, quality, aesthetically pleasing housing–always enhanced by
much-needed services designed to help residents in their most critical
areas of need, such as free on-site child care, after-school tutoring
for at-risk youth, job training for men and women to enter the
construction trades, and health wellness programs for seniors. We
believe that these amenities are the vital difference between simply
housing people and giving people a new chance on life.
Among our proudest
accomplishments, Century has invested more than $17 million to finance
the two largest transitional housing facilities for homeless veterans in
the nation. Westside Residence Hall, located in Inglewood, California,
and Villages at Cabrillo, located at the former Long Beach Naval
Station, together provide more than 900 beds for homeless veterans
transitioning back into mainstream society. These two facilities,
Westside and Villages at Cabrillo, developed in collaboration with
Cantwell-Anderson, a for-profit builder, and U.S. VETS, a nonprofit
service provider, have served more than 6,000 veterans, and have saved
VA tens of millions of dollars in medical costs, due to reduced
emergency admissions and lengthy hospital stays.
As a nonprofit, Century
was able to fund these two projects because our social purpose allowed
us to accept a high risk of loss, which is offset for us by the social
return of serving homeless veterans. In contrast, a private sector
lender would not make these high risk loans without a guaranteed
financial return, mostly because of the uncertainty of the tenant’s
income stream to provide enough return to service the debt. It has
always been our belief that government guarantees would allow private
sector lenders to finance this type of development. That is the
underlying concept of Public Law 105-368.
Nearly one-quarter of
homeless people in the United States are veterans. On any given night,
there are more than 25,000 homeless vets on the streets of Los Angeles
County alone. The national figure is more than ten times that amount.
Assisting homeless veterans is a specific element of Century’s mission.
Our first involvement with
homeless veterans was Westside Residence Hall, financed with a $5.6
million loan from Century. Developed by Cantwell-Anderson, a for-profit
firm, with services provided by U.S. VETS, a nonprofit veterans service
provider, Westside Residence Hall serves formerly homeless veterans with
transitional housing and services such as employment assistance, case
management, counseling, job training, and career planning–all in a safe,
sober environment. After 90 days in a clean and sober environment, the
veterans enter Westside and are provided a range of social services,
including career and substance abuse counseling, job search assistance
and classes in computer technology and general education, and VA
services. Once veterans are successfully placed in jobs, they begin
paying rent. All residents agree to regular drug testing, and according
to U.S. VETS, 97% to 100% of the residents are drug free at each
semimonthly testing.
Our most recent veterans
transitional housing accomplishment is Villages at Cabrillo, an
unprecedented 26-acre community, owned by Century and administered by
U.S. VETS. It is the largest residential social service complex of its
kind in the nation, integrating transitional housing with a broad
variety of services. Coordinating existing support service agencies,
including VA, at one location provides efficient delivery for services
such as substance abuse treatment, employment training and placement,
residential employment, and special programs for female, Native
American, senior and disabled veterans. Homeless families and youth are
also served, with programs such as child care, a school for homeless
children, and after-school tutoring provided by Century. Upon
completion, the project will serve thousands of veterans with its
1,000-bed capacity.
The Villages at
Cabrillo development, primarily funded by $11.4 million from Century,
earned national recognition last year when it was presented, nearby in
the Russell Office Building, with a Tax Credit Excellence Award by the
national Affordable Housing Tax Credit Coalition. John Hancock Realty
Advisors invested $7.1 million in tax credit equity in the project.
U.S. VETS, which manages
both of these projects, reports that the programs at Westside and
Villages at Cabrillo have had an 85% success rate in getting homeless
veterans back to work within 35 days. Several graduates have gone on to
start their own small businesses, and some have even purchased their own
homes. This success rate is an indication that such programs can work.
Compared to Century’s funding of
Westside and Villages at Cabrillo, I am unaware of any transitional
housing facilities for homeless veterans of significant size that have
been funded by other than public or philanthropic sources. The real
estate lending industry does not provide funding for this type of
development, because the risks associated with transitional housing
exceed the economic yield that such developments are able to provide.
The assurance of repayment provided by
a federal guarantee would both facilitate low-cost financing and
mitigate the lender’s risk of loss, as demonstrated by FHA mortgage
insurance programs within the Department of Housing and Urban
Development. With a federal guarantee, private capital markets would be
willing to finance transitional housing for homeless veterans. Without
a federal guarantee, private capital markets are not willing to finance
such transitional housing. Instead, such housing will require funding
sources that are able to assume substantial risks without commensurate
reward. Such funding sources do not exist in the private capital
markets today.
As First Vice President of the National
Housing Conference, and as a former member of the Board of Directors of
the National Coalition for Homeless Veterans, I have seen and studied
facilities for homeless veterans in many cities, including Baltimore,
New York, Boston, Milwaukee, San Francisco and Los Angeles.
Based on our experience,
Century was attracted to the potential of, and actively supported the
passage of Public Law 105-368, The Veterans Programs Enhancement Act of
1998, which the President signed into law on Veterans Day four years
ago, creating the Loan Guarantee for Multifamily Transitional Housing
for Homeless Veterans. That statute provided that, in carrying out the
program, the Secretary “…shall enter into contracts with a qualified
nonprofit organization, or other qualified organization, that has
experience in underwriting transitional housing projects to obtain
advice….”
Century was pleased to be
retained by Birch & Davis Associates, now known as ACS Federal
Healthcare, to serve as the “qualified nonprofit organization” as a
subcontractor to the U.S. Department of Veterans’ Affairs (VA) for the
development of the Pilot Program for the Loan Guarantee for Multifamily
Transitional Housing for Homeless Veterans.
In the four years since
the passage of the enacting legislation, implementation of the Pilot
Program has moved at a glacial pace. In my opinion, absent the work of
Century and ACS, there would be little, if any, progress to show for the
time that has elapsed since the legislation was enacted.
As I believe you will
hear from others today, the unmet need for housing to serve homeless
veterans remains great. The Department of Veterans Affairs estimates
that there are 275,000 homeless veterans on any given night, and more
than a half million experience homelessness at some time during the
year. Based on VA’s estimates, fewer than 10 percent of those
ex-service men and women are provided with services each year by the
Department.
It is unfortunate, but I
believe that it was due to a lack of priority and commitment of
resources by the Department, that after nearly four years the Pilot
Program is still not operational. In our experience, VA consistently
demonstrated a lack of understanding and enthusiasm for implementing the
Pilot Program.
This lack of understanding
of the nature of the Pilot Program initially was made apparent by VA’s
assignment of the Pilot Program to the Mental Health program area of the
Veterans Health Administration, rather than a real estate- and
finance-oriented unit of VA (e.g., the Loan Guarantee Administration of
the Veterans Benefits Administration).
The lack of enthusiasm in
implementation of the Pilot Program resulted in delays, caused by: 1)
The failure of the Department to champion the Pilot Program within its
own bureaucracy; 2) The need to constantly revisit basic concepts due
to the failure of assigned VA personnel to grasp the technical aspects
of the recommended real estate and financing structure; and 3) The
failure of assigned VA staff to respond to the consultants’ work in a
timely manner.
A specific example of VA’s
failure to respond in a timely manner is illustrated by VA’s response to
Century’s Task #3 Deliverable. Century submitted a draft deliverable
for VA review on July 5, 2000, and did not receive a response from VA
until September 12, 2000. This was two months after expiration of the
VA’s contractual review period of 10 working days.
Further, I am puzzled by
VA’s lengthy and unresponsive treatment of our efforts to assist in
effective implementation of the Pilot Program. The most recent delay
was VA’s failure to respond to Century’s submission of December 18,
2001, which recommended changes to the Guarantee Structure, based on the
inclusion of construction-period loan guarantees, and use of the Federal
Financing Bank as the source of funds for the VA-guaranteed loans.
Notwithstanding the fact
that throughout the contract period VA never expressed any
dissatisfaction with the work performed by ACS or Century, VA apparently
retained KPMG, without any notification or consultation with ACS or
Century, to perform an analysis of Century’s work. KPMG identified four
primary concerns with Century’s work. We believe that KPMG’s
conclusions were unfounded, partially because VA apparently did not
provide KPMG with the full scope of Century’s prior work. This is
detailed in Exhibit 4.
As a veteran, I
personally find it disheartening that four years have passed, but VA
does not have even the beginnings of a Pilot Program that could provide
a solution to the tragic problem of homelessness among America’s
veterans. More than one quarter of a million veterans, who gave of
themselves in the service of our great nation, sleep on the streets
every night. These four years should have been used to create and roll
out an innovative program to spur private investment in transitional
housing for homeless veterans, transitional housing that has been proven
to help individuals break the cycle of homelessness and reenter the
mainstream of society.
Despite the
difficulties and challenges in attempting to implement the Pilot Program
over the past four years, I am heartened to hear that Secretary Principi
may now move the Pilot Program forward, as a priority objective of the
Department, in order to meet the goal of financing development of
transitional housing for up to 5,000 homeless veterans.
Whether Century
participates further in this effort is not our decision, but it will be
worth the time, effort and money we have expended over the past several
years, if the result is that more homeless veterans are given a chance
at a new and better life.
Exhibit 1
G. Allan Kingston,
Biographical Data
G. Allan Kingston is
President/CEO of the Century Housing Corporation. He has directed
financing programs which have added more than 10,000 units of affordable
housing, in 110 developments in 40 communities, throughout the Los
Angeles area, and has brought to reality the innovative policy of “More
Than Shelter®.”
Acting as an intermediary
to community-based organizations and nonprofit and for-profit
developers, affordable housing developments financed by Century include
funding of innovative inner city developments which feature “More Than
Shelter,” combining housing with after-school tutoring/college prep
programs, academic counseling, transitional housing for homeless
veterans, child care, energy efficient homes, preapprenticeship
training, HIV and substance abuse counseling, training programs for
women in nontraditional jobs, and other socially responsive programs.
In addition to being a
Board member of Century Housing, Mr. Kingston also is First Vice
President and a member of the Executive Committee of the National
Housing Conference. He is a Board member of the National Association of
Affordable Housing Lenders, the Center for Housing Policy, and Shelter
Partnership, and he is Chairman of the California Housing Consortium.
Mr. Kingston has been
an executive in affordable housing lending, real estate development, and
private and public sector management. He has administered affordable
housing finance programs, large-scale urban redevelopment, new town
developments, and individual commercial, residential and resort
projects.
In the past, Mr. Kingston
has directed the real estate development activities and projects of
large corporations, and was a partner in several commercial and
residential projects in California, Hawaii, and the Midwest. He has
managed large scale residential and commercial projects for, among
others, Tecon Realty Corporation, Le Meridian Hotel (Coronado), Oceanic
Properties (Castle and Cook), The Hawaiiana Company, Centre Properties,
and University Development, Inc. His career began with federal and
local urban renewal agencies in California. He served as Executive
Director of the Fresno Redevelopment Agency, as Deputy Director of the
Oakland Redevelopment Agency, and with the U.S. Housing and Home Finance
Agency and HUD.
Mr. Kingston is a former
Board Member of the National Coalition for Homeless Veterans, the
nonprofit organization dedicated to bringing about the end of
homelessness among veterans. As a Navy veteran himself, Mr. Kingston’s
avid support of veteran and affordable housing issues has served as a
powerful link in keeping veterans issues at the forefront with
affordable housing advocates.
Exhibit 2
Statement Disclosing Federal
Grants and Contracts
Century Housing Corporation is a
participant in one (1) Federal contract relevant to the testimony of G.
Allan Kingston. Century Housing is a subcontractor to ACS Federal
Healthcare, Inc. (previously Birch-Davis), the prime contractor to the
Department of Veterans Affairs under Prime Contract Number
V101(93)P-1442. Century Housing entered into this contract on February
11, 2000.
Century was informed on August 15, 2002
that the Department informed ACS Federal Healthcare on July 30, 2002
that “…the report prepared by Century Housing Corporation (the
Deliverable dated December 18, 2002) was considered to be
unacceptable.” The communication from ACS Federal Healthcare also
informed Century that KPMG had been contracted to complete the project.
Exhibit 3
Chronology: Task Deliverables
Homeless Veterans Loan Guarantee Pilot
Program
Summary Table: Dates of
Submissions and Responses
|
Title |
Deliverable Submitted to VA |
VA Comments Due
[Received] |
Revised Deliverable Submitted to VA |
|
Task #1 Deliverable
·
Work Plan |
February 16, 2000 |
March 2, 2000
[March 1, 2000] |
March 10, 2000 |
|
Task #2 Deliverable
·
Draft Guidelines for Establishing
Loan Guarantee Program |
March 31, 2000 (Draft)
|
April 14, 2000
[April 27, 2000] |
May
15, 2000
|
|
May
15, 2000 (Revised) |
May
29, 2000
[May 25, 2000] |
June
7, 2000 |
|
Task #3 Deliverable
·
Rating, Ranking, and Selection
Process |
July
5, 2000 |
July
19, 2000
[September 12, 2000] |
September 28, 2000 |
|
·
Responses to OMB for Waiver
Request |
November 27, 2000 |
December 11, 2000
[No Comments Received from VA] |
January 17, 2001 |
|
Task #2 Deliverable Modification
·
Draft Guidelines for Establishing
Loan Guarantee Program |
December 18, 2001 |
January 7, 2002
[No Comments Received from VA] |
Awaiting Response |
|
Task #4 Deliverable
·
Evaluate Proposals |
Contract Terminated by VA |
NA |
NA |
EXHIBIT 4
Detailed Chronology of
Contract Events
Legislation establishing
the Program was signed into law by President Clinton on Veterans’ Day,
1998, directing VA to develop and implement a loan guarantee program to
induce private capital to assist in funding the development of
multifamily transitional housing for homeless veterans.
VA issued its initial Task
Order Request in 1999. Birch & Davis Associates (later ACS Federal
Healthcare, Inc.) was selected as the prime contractor in December 1999,
with Century as a subcontractor. In negotiating the specific work to be
performed, VA informed Century that the work of marketing and soliciting
development proposals would be performed by VA, and that Century would
not be involved in those specific activities. Century developed a work
plan (Task #1 Deliverable) defining work products and deliverable
timing, as required in the Task Order Request, and presented this plan
to VA in February 2000.
The Task #2 Deliverable,
Guarantee Structure, was delivered to VA in June 2000. The
Deliverable described the proposed program structure and laid down the
financial structuring parameters, including the amount and timing, of
the guarantee. Specifically, Century recommended that VA provide a
guarantee of 100% of the total amount of the loan. The guaranteed loan
was anticipated to equal about 60% of the total project cost. Per the
legislation, the guaranteed loan amount could not exceed 90% of the
total project cost. Century further recommended that VA’s guarantee
cover only the permanent loan period, and not cover the construction
period, in order to insulate VA from the considerably higher risk of
loss during the construction period. Century also recommended that
tax-exempt bonds, guaranteed by VA, be the source of funds for the
loans.
The Task #3
Deliverable, Selection Criteria, was submitted to VA in July
2000. The Deliverable described the proposed project features and
requirements, and application and selection processes. Century
recommended that borrower/developer qualifications, development
characteristics and services, and the development’s economic and
supportive services feasibility be considered in initially assessing
proposals seeking VA-guaranteed financing. Those proposals that met the
basic criteria would then be invited to fully develop a plan for a
project.
While work progressed on
the Task #2 and Task #3 Deliverables, VA invited representatives of OMB
to participate in the development of the Pilot Program. OMB introduced
the issues of the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (FCRA) and Circular
A-129, which mandate special circumstances for permitting the full
(100%) guarantee of a loan by the federal government. Century was
tasked with providing OMB with justification for the 100% guarantee
recommendation, to support VA’s request for a waiver to the requirements
of FCRA. Century produced several presentations and documents to
support VA’s waiver request, which OMB approved in February 2001.
In accordance with FCRA,
OMB stated that the Federal Financing Bank (FFB) must be the source of
funds for a loan that is 100% guaranteed by the federal government, to
prevent the creation of a market for securities equivalent to Treasury
issues in risk, but with higher yields. Century held discussions with
the Department of Treasury/FFB regarding lending policies and how FFB
funds could be integrated into the program. The mandate to utilize FFB,
however, appeared to be contrary to the intent of the legislation, which
specifically states that the program is an incentive for private
capital.
The inclusion of FFB
raised the issue of including construction-period financing under the VA
guarantee, to take advantage of FFB’s low-cost funds. Century was then
tasked with describing to VA the risks attendant with construction
financing, in order for VA to reasonably decide if construction
financing should be fully examined as an option. Century submitted this
report in May 2001. Upon VA’s review, it decided that
construction-period guarantees should be fully examined with the
inclusion of FFB funds as the Program’s source of guaranteed financing.
Century submitted a
Modified Task #2 Deliverable in December 2001. This revised deliverable
examined the circumstances under which construction-period guarantees
would be recommended and the impact of using FFB funds instead of the
tax exempt bonds, as had been previously recommended. Century
recommended that construction-period guarantees be used only if strict
controls, parallel to those mandated under Department of Housing and
Urban Development/FHA’s 221d(3) and 221d(4) mortgage insurance program
(for the new construction or substantial rehabilitation of multifamily
rental housing) were used and enforced. Using FFB funds for
construction and permanent financing was also recommended, because of
the preferential interest rate at which they are available.
VA failed to respond to
Century’s submission of December 18, 2001. This lack of response,
within the agreed upon ten-day comment period provided under the
contract, left the implication that VA accepted Century’s
recommendations regarding the changes to the Program, to include
construction-period loan guarantees and the FFB as the source of funds
for the VA-guaranteed loans.
VA, apparently
consequently, retained KPMG to evaluate if Century had complied with the
requirements of the Task Order Request. Apparently, VA did not provide
KPMG with the full scope of Century’s work. KPMG appeared, therefore,
unable to provide an accurate analysis. KPMG’s report of March 2002,
reported four primary criticisms:
1.
Century should have included more detailed
descriptions of specific aspects of the program.
2.
Century failed to include some
requirements stated in VA’s Task Order Request.
3.
Century should have developed procedural
manuals for the Pilot Program.
4.
Century did not performed a thorough
survey of existing federal loan guarantee programs.
These criticisms are
unfounded, as Century did perform all of the requirements of the Task
Order Request, as outlined below; and in response to the four KPMG
criticisms:
1.
Century provided substantial detail, both
in the December 18, 2001, and prior Deliverables, to fully describe the
proposed guarantee structure to industry professionals, without simply
adding unnecessary and redundant information.
2.
Century addressed all of the requirements
of the Task Order Request; this may not have been obvious to KPMG, as
VA may not have provided all of Century’s prior submissions to KPMG for
review.
3.
Century did not create an entire
procedural manual because that would negate the intent of a Pilot
Program, which is meant to determine the potential for success
through flexible and innovate approaches. Creating a new manual would
have also required that Century “reinvent the wheel,” as existing
federal programs already provide sufficient procedural guidance for the
Pilot Program.
4.
Century utilized its extensive experience
in the affordable housing industry in determining which federal loan
guarantee program would provide the most adaptable framework for the
Pilot Program. Century representatives interviewed several
professionals in the real estate financing industry, extensively
surveyed existing federal guarantee programs and convened interviews for
VA representatives with other federal government officials (GSA) who
administer federal guarantee programs.
In sum, Century and ACS
Federal Healthcare met all contractual deadlines timely and within
budget amounts.
EXHIBIT 5
List of Documents Provided to VA As Part
of Task #2 Deliverable Modification
submitted December 18, 2001
Exhibits to Pilot Program Task#2
Deliverable Modification
Exhibit 1
Diagram of Guarantee Structure
Exhibit 2
Letter of Commitment Provide Loan Funds (Legal
document)
Exhibit 3
Deed of Trust Note (Legal document)
Exhibit 4
Deed of Trust (Legal document)
Exhibit 5
Regulatory Agreement (Legal document)
Exhibit 6 Term
Sheet
Exhibit 7
Project Model
Exhibit 8 Flow
Charts
Exhibit 9 Loan
Loss Analysis
|
HUD/FHA closing documents
|
|
Document Title |
HUD Form Number |
|
1.
Opinion of Mortgagor’s Counsel |
|
|
2.
Agreement and Certification –
207/223(f) 223(a)(7) |
|
|
3.
HUD Amendment to AIA Document B181 |
|
|
4.
Building Loan Agreement |
|
|
5.
Escrow Agreement – Unpaid Construction
Costs/Delayed repairs |
92476.1 |
|
6.
Escrow Agreement for Latent Defects |
|
|
7.
Escrow Agreement for Working Capital |
|
|
8.
Escrow Agreement for Incomplete
Construction |
HUD 2456 |
|
9.
Agreement of Sponsors to Furnish
Additional Funds (Including Escrow Agreement) |
FHA 2476/a |
|
10.
Mortgagor’s Oath |
FHA 2478 |
|
11.
Mortgagee’s Certificate |
HUD 2434 |
|
12.
Agreement and Certification (Insurance
Of Advances) |
HUD 3305 |
|
13.
Agreement and Certification (Insurance
Upon Completion) |
HUD 3306 |
|
14.
Residual Receipts Note (Nonprofit
Mortgagors) |
HUD 91710 |
|
15.
Instructions For Leasehold Projects |
HUD 92070 |
|
16.
Promissory Note (Surplus Cash) |
HUD 92223 |
|
17.
Performance Bond – Dual Obligee |
HUD 92452 |
|
18.
Payment Bond |
HUD 92452-A |
|
19.
Request for Approval of Advance of
Escrow Funds |
|
|
20.
Off-site Bond – Dual Obligee |
HUD 92479 |
|
21.
Construction Contract |
|
|
22.
Regulatory Agreement for Multifamily
Projects and Healthcare Facilities |
|
|
23.
Multifamily/Health Care (Mortgage,
Deed Of Trust, Or Other Designation As Appropriate In Jurisdiction)
Assignment Of Rents And Security Agreement |
|
|
24.
Multifamily/Healthcare Facility Note (Multistate) |
|
|
25.
Request For Endorsement Of Credit
Instrument, And Certificate Of Mortgagee, Mortgagor And General
Contractor |
HUD 2455 |
New Pro Forma
documents created for Pilot Program
1.
Construction Loan Commitment Letter
2.
General Conditions of Construction Loan
Commitment
3.
Promissory Note
4.
Construction Loan Agreement
5.
Completion/Repair Security Agreement
6.
Construction Loan Deed Of Trust, Security
Agreement, And Fixture Filing
7.
Subordination, Nondisturbance And
Attornment Agreement
8.
Assignment Of Agreements (Construction)
9.
Assignment Of Rents And Leases
(Construction)
10.
Permanent Loan Commitment Letter
11.
Multifamily Note
12.
Environmental Indemnity
13.
Multifamily Deed Of Trust, Assignment Of
Rents, Security Agreement And Fixture Filing (California)
14.
Tri-Party Takeout Agreement
15.
Replacement Reserve And Security Agreement
16.
Form Of Borrower's Counsel Opinion
17.
Compliance Monitoring Agreement
18.
Agreement To Amend Or Comply
19.
Assignment Of Management Agreement
20.
Document Preparation Information
If
we can find information about the Site Selection Cmte Allan met
with, this should be inserted here. This would establish that VA
started to do something which has only now resulted in something
real.
|