TESTIMONY
of
RICHARD JONES
AMVETS NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE DIRECTOR
before the
COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’
AFFAIRS
SUBCOMMITTEE ON BENEFITS
U.S. HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES
on
VETERANS’ BENEFITS
LEGISLATION
Thursday April 11, 2002,
9:00 am, Room 334
Cannon House Office Building
Mr. Chairman and
Members of the Subcommittee:
Thank you for the opportunity to
testify before the Benefits Subcommittee on the four bills subject to
this legislative hearing. AMVETS is pleased to present our views
regarding H.R. 1108, a bill to reinstate the eligibility of a veteran’s
surviving spouse lost under current law on remarriage; H.R. 2095, a bill
to establish the home loan funding fee paid by Guard and Reserves at the
same level as that paid by active duty veterans; H.R. 2222, a bill to
adjust VA insurance programs; and H.R. 3731, a bill to increase funding
for State Approving Agencies.
Mr. Chairman,
AMVETS has been a
leader
since 1944 in helping to preserve the freedoms secured by
America's Armed Forces. Today, our organization continues its proud
tradition, providing, not only support for veterans and the active
military in procuring their earned entitlements, but also an array of
community services that enhance the quality of life for this nation's
citizens.
H.R. 1108, to amend
title 38, United States Code, to provide that remarriage of the
surviving spouse of a veteran after age 55 shall not result in
termination of dependency and indemnity compensation.
Rep. Michael Bilirakis introduced H.R.
1108 to resolve an inequity and reinstate the eligibility of certain
veteran’s surviving spouses to DIC benefits. Under current law,
surviving spouses are barred from receiving dependency and indemnity
compensation if they remarry after the age of 55. The DIC exception
stands alone, separate from Social Security, civil service, Central
Intelligence, and others. No other survivor program treats surviving
spouses as unhappily as to terminate these benefits on remarriage.
As members of this subcommittee know,
losing DIC compensation because of remarriage is an emotional issue. By
authorizing reinstatement of DIC for these survivors, Congress would
bring solace and comfort to those who desire to remarry after age 55.
AMVETS supports H.R. 1108 and agrees
that the current bar against receipt of these DIC benefits by surviving
spouses should be lifted.
H.R. 2095, to amend
title 38, United States Code, to provide for uniformity in fees charged
qualifying members of the Selected Reserve and active duty veterans for
home loans guaranteed by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
Representative Evans introduced H.R.
2095 to reduce the VA home loan-funding fee paid by members of the
Reserve component to the same level as that paid by active duty veterans
in application for a home loan guarantee. Under current law, reservists
pay a fee three-quarters of one percent higher than the rate paid by
active duty veterans.
AMVETS fully recognizes that the role
of our Reserves and National Guard has changed dramatically since the
end of the Cold War. As a result, we have significantly downsized our
active duty military force and asked our Reserves and National Guard to
accept a more prominent role in the Total Force.
Today, more than 50,000 Army and Air
Guardsmen have been called to federal and state duty, supporting
operations overseas while providing security on the home front, from
Capitol Hill to our airports and borders.
This legislation would
help send an important signal to the dedicated men and women who are
part of the Guard and Reserve service. With its consideration, you have
the chance to enhance the VA guarantee program and recognize it as an
important part of a veteran’s benefits package. With its approval, you
tell those currently in the Guard and Reserve that their hard work is
not forgotten. And with its enactment, you assist the National Guard
and Reserve with their recruitment efforts by allowing housing loans to
be offered as an incentive to service.
AMVETS supports H.R.
2095 and urges support from both sides on this issue.
H.R. 2222, to amend title
38, United States Code, to make certain improvements to the
Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance life insurance program for members
of the Armed Forces, and for other purposes.
Rep. Filner introduced H.R. 2222, the
Veterans Life Insurance Improvement Act of 2001, to provide improvements
in the VA insurance policies held by our nation’s veterans. The bill
would amend four separate areas of coverage.
Mr. Chairman, Section 2 of H.R. 2222
would have a positive impact on the way VA is able to handle a veteran’s
life insurance policy. Under current law, VA retains a veteran’s
insurance policy if it is unable to locate the primary beneficiary
following the death of a veteran. In these cases, the veteran’s
lifetime payment for insurance becomes nothing more than a bookkeeping
entry on which no payout is made. In these circumstances, AMVETS
believes that Section 2 takes the appropriate step in authorizing VA to
“fund” or “allocate” the policy to secondary beneficiaries or an
appropriate relative.
Section 3 of the bill would lower
premium payments paid under the VA administered Service-Disabled
Veterans Insurance (SDVI) program (chapter 19 of title 38, United States
Code). AMVETS has no position on this section of the bill. While we
generally support enhancements in veterans’ benefits as legitimate
compensation to the men and women who were injured in service to their
country, we are unfamiliar with the actuarial tables that form the basis
of this group life insurance program.
Section 4 of this bill would update
the coverage provided severely disabled veterans with mortgage life
insurance. Clearly, the proposed increase of maximum coverage to
$200,000 from $90,000 is appropriate. Since 1992, when this coverage
was last adjusted, the benefits of this program have significantly
eroded. Today, VMLI covers only a fraction of what was covered 20 years
ago. Increasing the amount to $200,000 is sufficient to bring it back
up to meet years of rising costs and inflation.
Finally, Section 5 of the bill will
ensure that veterans would not see their VMLI coverage terminated when
they reach age 70. This is a simple thing but very important because it
brings our VMLI in line with comparable policies in the private
sector. AMVETS supports this section to allow veterans to keep their
insurance after age 70.
H.R. 3731, to amend
title 38, United States Code, to increase amounts available to State
approving agencies to ascertain the qualifications of educational
institutions for furnishing courses of education to veterans and
eligible persons under the Montgomery GI Bill and under other programs
of education administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs.
H.R. 3731 is introduced to increase
funding for State Approving Agencies. The bill is straightforward. It
increases SAA annual funding to $18 million from $14 million. As the
Subcommittee knows, State Approving Agencies serve an important role in
evaluating and supervising GI Bill programs. Their work helps safeguard
the programs veterans choose to pursue. In sum, SAAs help ensure GI
Bill resources are used for purposes intended—to provide quality
education and training programs for veterans. Without congressional
approval, SAA funding would return to fiscal year 2000 levels and likely
reduce the potential contribution of these agencies. AMVETS supports
the bill.
AMVETS sincerely appreciates the
opportunity to appear before you today, and we, again, thank you for
your vigilance in improving benefits and services to veterans and their
families.
Back to
Witness List |