|
STATEMENT OF
BRIAN E. LAWRENCE
ASSOCIATE NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE DIRECTOR
OF THE
DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS
BEFORE THE
COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS
SUBCOMMITTEE ON BENEFITS
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
APRIL 11, 2002
Mr. Chairman and
Members of the Subcommittee:
On behalf of the Disabled American Veterans
(DAV), I am pleased to appear before you to testify on H.R. 1108, a bill
to provide that remarriage of a veteran’s surviving spouse shall not
result in termination of Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC);
H.R. 2095, the Reservist VA Home Loan Fairness Act of 2001; H.R. 2222,
the Veterans Life Insurance Improvement Act of 2001; and H.R. 3731, a
bill to increase amounts available to State Approving Agencies.
In accordance with its Constitution and
Bylaws, the DAV’s legislative focus is on benefits and services for
service-connected disabled veterans, their dependents, and survivors.
Our legislative agenda is determined by mandates in the form of
resolutions adopted by our membership.
Veterans’
benefits are provided to family members because they are, or were during
the disabled veteran’s lifetime, dependent upon the veteran for
support. Entitlement to those benefits ends when the dependence ends by
reason of age, marriage, or remarriage. Under section 1310 of title 38,
United States Code, DIC may be paid to surviving spouses, children, and
dependent parents of veterans. Section 1318 of title 38, United States
Code, authorizes DIC for surviving spouses and children of veterans
whose deaths were preceded by total service-connected disabilities for
specified periods. Under section 101(14) of title 38, United States
Code, DIC is a benefit paid to a “surviving spouse, child, or parent.”
Under section 101(3), “surviving spouse” is defined as, among other
things, a spouse who “has not remarried,” and section 101(4) conditions
status as a “child” upon the child being “unmarried.” Thus, by
definition, DIC, as it pertains to a surviving spouse or child, is a
benefit for a survivor who is unmarried. Under section 103(d) of title
38, United States Code, entitlement to DIC revives upon the termination
of a disqualifying marriage of a surviving spouse. The purpose of H.R.
1108 is to authorize continuing entitlement to DIC for a surviving
spouse who remarries after age 55.
The DAV has
no mandate from its membership on this issue, but the purpose of this
bill is one beneficial to surviving spouses of disabled veterans, and we
therefore have no objection to its favorable consideration.
For most VA
home loans, members of the Selected Reserve must pay higher loan fees
than servicemembers and veterans subject to the fees. In recognition of
the increased role of reserve forces in our national security, H.R. 2095
would extend home loans to members of the Selected Reserve with the same
loan fees charged others for home loans. This bill has an equitable
purpose, and the DAV has no opposition to its favorable consideration.
Section 2
of H.R. 2222 would authorize payment of the proceeds of a National
Service Life Insurance (NSLI) policy or United States Government Life
Insurance (USGLI) policy to a contingent beneficiary when a primary
beneficiary does not make claim for the payment within 2 years of the
insured’s death and would authorize payment to other than a designated
beneficiary when no designated beneficiary claims payment within 4 years
of the insured’s death. Section 3 of the bill would amend section 1922
of title 38, United States Code, to base future premiums and cash, loan,
paid-up, and extended values for Service-Disabled Veterans’ Insurance (SDVI)
on current mortality experience rather than the 1941 mortality table now
prescribed in that section. Section 4 of the bill would increase
Veterans’ Mortgage Life Insurance (VMLI) coverage from $90,000 to
$200,000. Section 5 of the bill would repeal provisions that terminate
VMLI coverage at 70.
The DAV has
no resolution on section 2 of H.R. 2222. Section 3 of the bill fulfills
a recommendation in The Independent Budget (IB) to
base SDVI premiums on more current mortality tables. The intent of the
SDVI program was to make life insurance available to disabled veterans
at rates comparable to rates offered by commercial insurers to healthy
persons. Because today’s premium rates are still based on life
expectancy from 1941 mortality tables, SDVI is now more costly than
commercial policies at standard rates. This change will again make the
SDVI program achieve its intended purpose. The DAV fully supports this
provision. Similarly, section 4 of the bill fulfills the IB
recommendation that VMLI coverage be increased to reflect increases in
the cost of homes. The DAV fully supports section 4 of the bill.
Currently, veterans who still have unpaid mortgages at age 70 lose
coverage under VMLI. Section 5 of the bill would correct that problem.
Although we have no resolution on section 5, it is a logical and
equitable improvement to the VMLI program, and it will benefit our
members who are eligible for this insurance. This provision should be
enacted. The DAV extends its thanks to Congressman Filner for inclusion
of these beneficial provisions in this bill and to the Subcommittee for
its consideration.
H.R. 3731
would increase the amounts available to state approving agencies to
ascertain the qualifications of educational institutions for furnishing
courses of education to veterans and others eligible for benefits under
VA educational programs. The DAV has no opposition to this bill.
On behalf
of the more than one million members of the DAV and the members of its
Women’s Auxiliary, I want to thank you for the opportunity to present
our views on these bills. The Subcommittee’s efforts to improve VA
benefits signify to our Nation’s veterans that their dedicated service
to our country is noted and appreciated. Clearly, the DAV’s mission to
improve the lives of disabled veterans is shared by the Subcommittee.
We appreciate your efforts and look forward to working with you in the
future on issues important to disabled veterans.
Back to
Witness List |