House Committee on Veterans' Affairs Banner. Click here for our home page.

About the Chairman | About the Committee | Committee News | Committee Hearings | Committee Documents | Committee Legislation | VA Benefits | VA Health Care | Veterans' Links | Democrat's Home Page | Contact the Committee

Testimony of Steven C. Halsey  

Halsey, Rains, and Associates, L.L.C.

 The Coalition for Professional Certification 

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS

SUBCOMMITTEE ON BENEFITS 

Oversight Hearing on Licensing and Credentialing

 of Military Job Skills for Civilian Employment 

September 27, 2000 

 

Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee, thank you for the opportunity to return to report on our progress in the area of veterans’ employment and professional certification.  As you know I have worked with the Committee for several years on this issue and was honored to appear before you last year to offer our further assistance.  That said I would spare you any re-introduction or description of the CPC, you have patiently sat through it before. 

I am proud to report real progress over the past year in the area of veteran transition as is pertains to professional certification.  As you know, we have worked diligently from its inception on the joint Veterans’ and Small Business Committees Veterans Entrepreneurship and Small Business Development Act of 1999, P.L. 106-50.  Both Committees have expressed their gratitude to the CPC for our key assistance in obtaining funding for this important law.  Additionally, you will recall that in our testimony last year, the CPC called for a national conference on Veteran transition and certification.  As you know we held that conference in June and it was, by all accounts, an enormous success.  Once again Chairman Quinn, we wish to thank you for serving as our keynote and displaying your commitment to this issue by repeatedly returning to the conference in between floor votes on VA-HUD Appropriations. I am especially proud to acknowledge the personal gratitude expressed to me by NOCA President Michael Martin and several NOCA Board Members for the opportunity to take part and learn first hand about this important issue.  I have since received a hearty “job well done” from another NOCA Board member who was invited but unable to attend due to scheduling conflicts.  

While we were energized by the outpouring of support this conference generated, we were disappointed that the majority of the funding promised by the Administration fell through, literally within hours of the event.  As you know Mr. Chairman, there was no talk of cancellation; rather the CPC stepped up to assume all financial obligations.  This entailed expenditures well in excess of the entire CPC budget for this year.  I mention this only to highlight the commitment of our organization to this cause.  All too often we hear lofty claims of commitment from those who would appear in the eleventh hour to claim credit for the work of others.  “Put your money where your mouth is” may be a trite phrase, but it is appropriate when those with the means, both in money and manpower, fail to participate when there is work to be done but demand their due when they perceive a benefit in the offering.  

The immediate results of the conference are as follow: 

  • Formation of a Veterans Transition Task Force.  This Task Force, created with bi-partisan support, brings together a “Dream Team” of experts in this area to provide guidance to the Congress, Administration and private sector.  Specifically this group is working to prepare for the second annual Veterans’ Transition Conference.
  • Scheduling of the second annual Veterans’ Transition Conference.  We are working with all concerned and have reached a tentative date in May 2001.
  • Further support for the Veterans Education legislation unanimously passed by this committee that includes groundbreaking provisions to expand benefits to include reimbursement for legitimate certification costs.

On the issue of reimbursement for certification costs, I must close by pleading with the Committee to avoid the danger of elevating any organization which only offers organizational certification standards to the private sector as a product, or at a cost, to a position of guidance to the Secretary.  Clearly there is a conflict present if an organization is asked to create for a government agency that which it sells in the private sector.  Seeking profit or market dominance from a veterans’ desire to enhance his or her career options is wholly inappropriate and must not be encouraged.   

Thank you for the opportunity to present our views.  I would welcome any questions you might have. 

Back to Witness List